So you destroy bitUSD with a revive price of above 5 cents to force people to use onest.usd or honest.usd or other new assets instead ?

Seriously ?

Which Dev's are responsible for that ?

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=32545.msg343183;topicseen#msg343183


You think you can just change voting system with no consensus ?

Placeholder to list all corrupt committee members who support stealing committee funds based on a irrelevant BAIP which has no power over any funds.


Based on offical BAIP's defenition on github

BAIP Types

There are two kinds of BAIPs:

-An Informational BAIP describes a BitAssets design issue, or provides general guidelines or information to the BitShares community, but does not propose a new feature, consensus change or any other modification. Informational BAIPs do not necessarily represent a BitShares community consensus or recommendation, so users and implementors are free to ignore Informational BAIPs or follow their advice. Examples would be best-practises or recommendations.
-A Consensus Upgrade BAIP describes any change that affects some or all BitAssets implementations, such as a parameters or price feed formula, logic and source or addition that affects the applications using BitAssets.

A BAIP has nothing to do with a MM contest for GDEX assets or any financing.
It's sole purpose is about parameters and information of bitassets.

Claiming a MM contest is approved based on a BAIP is like claiming any worker is being approved when calling it a BAIP like core,legal etc.

Part of committee is not executing community voting will but instead is trying now to misuse the committee funds mainly for bitcrabs self benefit.

All committee members breaking consensus,protocol and getting ilegal will be listed here for future awareness.


BAIP gives no permission over any funds nore can it approve any MM contest since BAIP was not constructed for it.

https://github.com/bitshares/baips/blob/master/baip-0001.md



Where does BAIP based on its defenition gives any possibility normal worker to get approved and funded like MM contest where funding clearly has nothing to do anything with a BAIP based on the defenition the community agreed on.The chinese and foreigners!

Committee's duty is to uphold the protocol based on consensus

BAIP8(https://github.com/bitshares/baips/blob/master/baip-0008.md) is a new drafted proposal that consist reduce of bitcny price threshold from 0.22 cny to 0.154 cny

Now 2 poll workers have been created:

1.14.264 Poll-BAIP8-Implement new threshold for bitcny at 0.154CNY
1.14.265 Poll-BAIP8-Do Not Implement new threshold for bitcny
According to BAIP procedure definition, the BAIP8 will be considered approved while below 3 criteria are met:

1.worker 1.14.264 get more voting power than 1.14.265 worker.
2.worker 1.14.264 get more voting power than BAIP-Threshold Worker 1.14.236.
3.Both No.1 & 2 above last for three consecutive days.

BAIP: 0008 Title: Reduce of price threshold by 30% for bitcny Authors: b-dex Status: Accepted Type: Consensus Created: 2020-06-20


Abstract

The purpose of this proposal is to get bitcny full pegg back and make bitshares dex back attractive to traders


Specification

Bitcny and Bitusd has been put a price feed threshold to stop the negative effects of price manipulations on CEX.
Since then volume and interrest on trading on these both bitassets have sunk dramaticly.
To get back interest for the bitcny there is an opportunity to get the pegg back by reducing the threshold by 30%.
Currently all debtors who are shorting bitcny have a CR of 2.6 or higher.
This means reducing the threshold by 30% their CR will fall to 1.8.
There will be no margin calls and noone is going to lose a single BTS.
This way bitcny gets back its full value and the market gets attractive again to be used for trading.
BitUSD has currently not the opportunity because their CR is way lower than at bitcny debtors.


Operation
3 days after getting the BAIP proposal approved all witnesses change at 10 pm UCT time the price feed threshold for bitcny from
0.22 bitcny/bts to 0.154 bitcny/bts.

Please vote according to your opinion.


BAIP8(https://github.com/bitshares/baips/blob/master/baip-0008.md)



Please note the 2 debtors under CR of 2.6 also have enough BTS to increase their CR to above 2.6 but are currently so low fighting between each other to catch the force settlements.

Am trying to adress here some major problems where everyone else is free to add his points of view why bitshares is in such a deep crisis.


1.Broken governance

2.Corrupt committee controlled by a small group which makes bitassets untrusted and committee funds unsafe.

3.Fake price feeds depegging bitassets for a very long time.High risk something like that will happen in future,bitassets paramaters controlled by a small untrustworthy group making people leaving bitassets.

4.Risky Gateways including closed ones Sparkdex,CB,OL,Easydex,Winex making majority of bitshares members not willing to hold non bitshares token at gateways anymore.

5.Centralization of power and abuse.Example Abit taking away core members permissions on github to put a BSIP into voting (which was fucked up which i told him,since it had not been approved anyways but the dictacting from him that core devs are not allowed to put a BSIP up to voting and there was no possibility to give core devs permission back without his personal agreement as only he had full control over github and putting his opinion over all other core devs at that time).
Same on telegram group ,installing a bot without permission of any other of the 15 Admins there to mute and ban longterm members who doesn't fit in his point of view.
ALL admins disagree with his actions but no response from him other than trying to dictate what is not allowed to talk about.He installed a bot no other Admin has access to.
People are basicly not participating anymore and leaving to other smaller chats having enough of him.
It's an active process of destroying a community.Old core dev's had also big ethical issues with Abits move on github.
Some people have clearly to much power with no bigger consequences when abusing which needs to be limited to stop abuse
as both communities the foreigner and chinese one are tired which led to inactivity of community and no participation in voting.

6.Community will not being executed with no consequences.
You can see everywhere people and even big proxies stopped voting because why should someone vote if his will is not being executed or when he knows a small group will only execute what they prefer.
Ethics in leading group is non existent.
Reading Abits neverending explanations of his acceptance of abuse on bitshares on telegram chat was a shame as a committee member of bitshares.
Committee should be hold by members with high trust AND ethics and not just by the most active ones who activly destroyed bitshares the last 2 years.


7.Community not reacting activly anymore on abuse.Everyone writes about it but noone stands up anymore as committee members who did have been kicked out and been replaced with inactive ones.
Community members are after 2 years of a never ending fight tired and see no effect on taking actions against clear abuse even when talking to someone mention it everytime.


8.Bitshares witnesses who are not activly working for bitshares or adding any other value like infra just to collect rewards using a simple VPS.
Bitshares infra have been massivly destroyed by replacing good active witnesses who provided infra with new witnesses who doesn't provide anything or even participate at bitshares.

9.Custodial voting like ZB.ZB doesn't update their votings at all.They have been used by bitcrab to enforce his point of view and they have completly no interaction with bitshares or even knowledge.Still their old voting settings are making witness and worker voting messed up.

10.Longterm stagnation.No real feature have been worked on for a very long time.Small chinese group tries to play with parameters and nothing else.
Bitshares getting irrelevant as other exchanges have outdated bitshares in many aspects.Bitshares small worker already will take 5 months with no significant improvements.(features)

11.Legal issues caused by a small group unwilling to even check the effects of their actions.
Legal worker supported by a small group which will make big part of community leave should it get voted in.

12.Community getting smaller and smaller.Big amount of longterm members getting silent and not participating anymore on both sides.

13.Basicly lack of trust caused by all the drama and manipulations by a small group killing any hope for bitshares by a big group.

14.Decission and planning made by a small group in a closed chat with a clear track record of fails who are blocking any other proposals.

15.GDEX asking for KYC.On their website demanding selfie with ID card including facial features.


Maybe some people can understand now why Rudex and some other gateways are a pain in the ass for them and why they tried to enforce a centralized bitshares using legal trying to kick them out (see volume)

[poll] BTS repurchase destruction proposal has been voted active for over a week.

Proposal should get immedently implemented.

To be updated later