1
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ypool.net - Fast PTS pool
« on: February 21, 2014, 04:05:06 pm »Was the website compromised? My AV just blocked it because of malware...
Avast?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1] 2
Avast?
2
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ypool.net - Fast PTS pool
« on: February 20, 2014, 05:17:29 pm »
Mining was still up the whole time I think.
3
BitShares PTS / Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« on: February 20, 2014, 03:20:03 am »Hello
3 R9 290 Sapphire
collisions/min: 8486.8750 Shares total: 110
Share found! (Blockheight: 53586)
-a 1 -t 0.0,1,1,2,2
Good
With the latest version? No. I get more with 3x 280X. People in this thread have reported speeds of close to 4000 CPM for each card.
Read the last 10 pages and try the various settings and configurations they've posted. Also, in your commandline there is a . instead of , between 0 and 0. By the looks of it, most 290 users get better performance with -a 0 or -a 2.
Try this instead: -t 0,0,1,1,2,2 (try with AND without -a 1, -a 2 and -a 3)
If on Windows, you'll probably get around what he's getting.
4
BitShares PTS / Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« on: February 20, 2014, 12:07:03 am »Estimated difficulty: 0.02345569 and rising everyday. I guess in 5 days PTS will loose it's profitability with a single R9 280X :/ Those ridiculous 10X R9 290X Litecoin Rigs probably have figured this is the best coin right now.
Heh, how about the guys with 100 290s? They're loving the 2+ BTC per day.
5
BitShares PTS / Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« on: February 19, 2014, 06:45:39 pm »hi NaN!
we know difficult for protoshares is rised to 0.017247.
just a simple question.
When difficult rise, with same config, cpm go down?
or when difficult rise the cpm remain the same, but i get minus shares/hour?
thank you for the answer!
CPM will stay the same at all difficulties. Share difficulty is defined by the pool and will also stay the same. What will change is how hard it is to get a block.
6
BitShares PTS / Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« on: February 18, 2014, 07:16:46 pm »Hi guys,
I would like to establish a forecast of profitability. Is someone could help me?
For example, knowing how much is the monthly PTS mining profitability with the same RIG (cpm) speed? Taking into account the rising progressive difficulty. Even for an idea...?
Thank you!
Also, there's the ever decreasing block reward to keep in mind, as well as the essentially guaranteed price swings coming up in PTS.
7
BitShares PTS / Re: GPU Mining and the market price of PTS
« on: January 23, 2014, 07:32:09 pm »
Interesting, I'll take your word for it. I was only going off relative hashrates of a 280x, which makes around 1,000 c/m from what I've seen (maybe it's more now?).
Anyway, looks like for you it's competitive with scrypt. The recent ~10% diff reduction should have helped too, although price is a bit lower now as well.
Anyway, looks like for you it's competitive with scrypt. The recent ~10% diff reduction should have helped too, although price is a bit lower now as well.
8
BitShares PTS / Re: GPU Mining and the market price of PTS
« on: January 22, 2014, 05:59:01 pm »You could almost certainly make more than LTC at one of the multipools, which requires very little management. Now, if the difficulty drops the currently predicted amount, and price stays the same or climbs, the ~19-20% increase in revenue will probably make it competitive with scrypt. Of course, as you point out, improvements in the GPU miner will have an affect as well.in the last 5 days i made ~45 PTS with comparable 10 Mhs-scrypt-mining rigs, which stand for ~15 LTC in that time
My original point still stands: GPUs haven't impacted PTS much, because it's not competitive with scrypt...yet.
so i mined ~ 21 LTC (exchanged) with this pts.1gh.com-pool, but with only 75 % of the energy costs, which i have had with scrypt-mining: 180/135 $ - so i saved 45 $ extra energy this time
my conclusion is: i have mined more LTC with PTC and this with lower costs - so PTC-GPU-mining is really competitive with scrypt - you have to read the numbers!
I have no idea how you made that much PTS with a 10 MHS rig. That's only like 13,000 coll/min or so unless a more efficient miner has been released or my numbers are just off. You should get closer to 25 PTS in 5 days by the numbers I have.
Also, what are you paying for electricity??
9
BitShares PTS / Re: Why is ypool destroying PTS? (70% mined by ypool)
« on: January 17, 2014, 05:50:39 pm »Oh no thanks. No longer interested in Protoshares as i lost faith and do not trust the devs anymore. If that is no alarm to anyone of you then im even more glad that im out before the big crash.
oh yea, above 70% of the Pts are mined by your pool and you and your compadres earn 5% of that at minimum, plus the share from your miner binaries. Bias much?
Do you really have any idea? The miner developers at ypool are not affiliated.
As for 5% seeming a bit high, how much power would the other pools have if ypool had the same fees? (as jh00 stated above)
Instead of being angry, why not just mine somewhere else?
Oh I forgot, you don't care about PTS anymore, since you're out.
10
BitShares PTS / Re: GPU Mining and the market price of PTS
« on: January 16, 2014, 04:49:04 pm »
Also, I think you have the answer in your post: your 18 MH rig is making you less than $100/day on PTS, while you could almost certainly be making more than that mining, well, scrypt.
Why would I mine PTS with an AMD GPU? NVidia is a different story, but again, it does not appear to have affected much.
Anyway, if we believe in what's going on here, we should appreciate this buying opportunity, right?
You're not wrong but also keep in mind that 18MH is not one rig. It's about 12 so playing the field on scrypt's various pump/dump garbage coins (Dodge, Catcoin, etc.) is a bit of a hassle vs keeping it on one coin, like LTC, which was what I based my comparison on.
Also, GPU mining hasn't had the effect I was expecting on PTS yet but the tech is also mostly in development. Once GPU mining becomes the norm things may change. I'm not sure if this is a good thing. I know Bytemaster had a bounty out for anyone that could prove the momentum algorithm could be done better in a GPU. That bounty has come and gone but it never the less seems that he felt GPU mining was a "Bad Thing" for PTS. Later he released a bounty for a GPU miner...so...I dunno.
You could almost certainly make more than LTC at one of the multipools, which requires very little management. Now, if the difficulty drops the currently predicted amount, and price stays the same or climbs, the ~19-20% increase in revenue will probably make it competitive with scrypt. Of course, as you point out, improvements in the GPU miner will have an affect as well.
My original point still stands: GPUs haven't impacted PTS much, because it's not competitive with scrypt...yet.
11
BitShares PTS / Re: GPU Mining and the market price of PTS
« on: January 16, 2014, 04:41:03 pm »By all appearances, GPUs have had a negligible impact on net processing power. We're still set to drop next difficulty change.
http://mrx.im/pts.php
Also, I think you have the answer in your post: your 18 MH rig is making you less than $100/day on PTS, while you could almost certainly be making more than that mining, well, scrypt.
Why would I mine PTS with an AMD GPU? NVidia is a different story, but again, it does not appear to have affected much.
Anyway, if we believe in what's going on here, we should appreciate this buying opportunity, right?
Did I get that right, that difficulty will go down again at "Time to retarget: 8d 01:08:19 (2014-01-24 09:25:03 UTC+9)"? And this potentially makes the price drop a little?
I'm hoping difficulty increases point to scarcity point to greater demand point to price jumps! Not always the case though, especially short-term.
go pro(toshares)!!
In the past with PTS, difficulty increases have led to scarcity, as network collisions/min have gone down after the increases. However, we are set to drop about 16% in 7 days or so, which will likely increase supply beyond the implied ~19%, because it'll become more favorable to mine, attracting additional resources.
12
BitShares PTS / Re: GPU Mining and the market price of PTS
« on: January 15, 2014, 10:16:06 pm »
By all appearances, GPUs have had a negligible impact on net processing power. We're still set to drop next difficulty change.
http://mrx.im/pts.php
Also, I think you have the answer in your post: your 18 MH rig is making you less than $100/day on PTS, while you could almost certainly be making more than that mining, well, scrypt.
Why would I mine PTS with an AMD GPU? NVidia is a different story, but again, it does not appear to have affected much.
Anyway, if we believe in what's going on here, we should appreciate this buying opportunity, right?
http://mrx.im/pts.php
Also, I think you have the answer in your post: your 18 MH rig is making you less than $100/day on PTS, while you could almost certainly be making more than that mining, well, scrypt.
Why would I mine PTS with an AMD GPU? NVidia is a different story, but again, it does not appear to have affected much.
Anyway, if we believe in what's going on here, we should appreciate this buying opportunity, right?
13
Keyhotee / Re: Post your Alpha Keyhotee Public Key and Be known!
« on: January 14, 2014, 07:00:21 pm »
5wexATW2QeDewpAE9kSWf4DASssn5Jw3kZnG2nMcvkBzhKqtSy
14
BitShares PTS / Re: ★Giveaway I★ Claim your free PTS - rule inside
« on: December 18, 2013, 03:58:09 am »
PgTm2ZUzDpMdbkSrMudyGRLSsKjWGWR4TH
Great idea!
Great idea!
15
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ypool.net - Fast PTS pool
« on: December 09, 2013, 11:13:02 pm »
doesntmatter was serious when he said it's his job. LOL
Pages: [1] 2
