Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - milkmeat

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6
1
对水滴资本和常春藤资本不了解。请提供一下他们的介绍及官网。以及他们对spring基金的官方公告及承诺。

2
中文 (Chinese) / Re: (2000RMB悬赏)bitCNY ID无法查询记录
« on: January 06, 2018, 02:04:25 am »
对区块链来说如果有足够的确认后(bts系统只要几分钟),就可以认为是永远存在,不可能被修改,也不可能消失的了。
上面那个区块链浏览器除非有很严重的bug,不然应该是和链上的数据一致的。我还没试过他返回结果不对的情况。

3
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 请问如何获取比特股hxid
« on: January 06, 2018, 01:51:18 am »
刚才在另一个帖子里回了一个查 tx id 的地址,你的这个txid是

http://cryptofresh.com/tx/1.11.78292307

好像并没有你的转账交易,很大可能是B网把txid搞错了。问他们解决

4
中文 (Chinese) / Re: (2000RMB悬赏)bitCNY ID无法查询记录
« on: January 06, 2018, 01:31:06 am »
用下面这个网站可以根据transaction id查询,例如
(这个只是例子)
http://cryptofresh.com/tx/a5fea9b2abaaededabd4bd9af22e1e95da9f8ef2

把tx/后面那串16进制的数字(红色部分)换成你自己的应该可以查到。
我试了你提供的两个id都显示page not found
最大可能是别人给你的这两个tx id搞错了,谁给你的就先联系他们解决

另,我自己在AEX上面查到的tx id是 1.11.123456789 格式的,拿到上面那个网址上一样能用。两种格式都支持。

5
The reason I am here is that I think all POW crypto currencies are not sustainable. While I am looking for alternatives I found BTS. Its POS model is still so far the best one and answer a lot of my questions.

6
xeroc, your site https://delegate.xeroc.org/paperwallet.html has a certification key error. Chrome blocks me from opening your site.

-- Quote from chrome
Your connection is not private

Attackers might be trying to steal your information from delegate.xeroc.org (for example, passwords, messages, or credit cards). NET::ERR_CERT_AUTHORITY_INVALID

7
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 怪物应用:多链配合
« on: June 02, 2015, 09:28:48 am »
说起来,note和pls是不上线了,在那可以买到啊?内盘?

云币也可以买
yunbi.com

8
General Discussion / Re: BitAssets 3.0 - For Community Review
« on: May 03, 2015, 09:11:18 am »
110% forced cover is a feature, not a bug...

101%-105% max would clearly be nice.


I can't imagine trying to explain why we have two kinds of bitAssets that are the same thing but that are not compatible. It's impossible to market that.

We're used to it in America. We have two kinds of politicians that are the same thing but that are not compatible (when in view). It's actually very easy to market and is working quite well for TPTB. ;)
Hilarious  :P That's a very clever analogy, no doubt it'll help our marketing team !

IMHO this is not a good analogy.
In USA there are two and only two parties.
In our world we have too many altcoins that claim to have stable value, such as nubit, tether, etherum etc. Having 2 different bitUSD will easily confuse people and drive them to use other altcoins.

9
General Discussion / Re: BitAssets 3.0 - For Community Review
« on: May 02, 2015, 01:08:42 am »
To clarify, BitAssets 3.0 might replace existing BitAssets eg BitGold with a new hard fork at some stage? Will BitAssets that currently exist be mapped straight into the 3.0 system?

from BM's friday comments on beyond bitcoin: BTA3.0 will coexist with the current system, but BM expects that the new system will be preferred. The old system will naturally wind down, and if it totally winds down it could be disabled with a hardfork.
Ohhhh. So existing BitGold is not the same as BitGold 3.0?

Are delegates supposed to publish feeds for the old assets? What if they refuse and nobody can unwind at market prices? Are we sure this has been thought through compketely?
what happens with bitUSD that are unaccessable due to lost keys?

Same thing that happens to BitUSD that are held by someone as savings for ever.  It requires someone to be short forever and will ultimately push up the price of BitUSD above $1 if there is no-one willing to short

BTA1.0 and 3.0 should be able to use the same price feed because they peg to the same asset (e.g USD).

I have concern that having old and new BTA running together will weaken the confidence that people want to accept BTA. As the BTA 1.0 isn't working well, who knows if BTA 3.0 is working well or not?
If we have confidence that both BTA 1.0 and BTA 3.0 can peg to 1 USD eventually, why not we convert BTA1.0 to BTA3.0 to keep things simple.

10
上一篇是反驳交易引擎带动BTS价格下跌的观点。

但我发现标题又是在针对30天平仓期
最开始的规则是没有期限的,那时内盘BTS卖单价格都比时代高2-3个百分点,BTA购买力不足,大家疯狂short,并且高2-3个点在内盘买BTS。
那时也没人敢做承兑商。

后来BM改为30天必须平仓了,BTA有了强需求,咕噜敢做承兑商就是因为这个修改。
即便是30天平仓,当时很多人仍然抢着要short,人们经常抱怨我的机器人买单挡住他们short的单子了。
可见30天平仓并未打击大家的信心,信心是在价格一路下跌而丢失的。

我对30天平仓的看法是这个规则太僵硬了,不够灵活,导致行情冷清时空单买不到足够的BTA平仓,对以后BTA的应用需求也会是很大的制约,因此应该要制定一个更灵活的规则取代它。比如agile提出的每个月必须平仓部分保证自己的抵押超过2倍价值。还有我提出过可以每个月平10%,分期还款。
也许还有很多其它方案,原则就是第一要保证有足够的BTA供应支撑应用,第二要有BTA回收需求,限制BTA不被滥发。

我也认为bts的低迷不是简单的由于short规则引起的。如果这么简单的话,那么把所有的算法逆转过来,bts不就可以简简单单涨到天上去了?为什么没人fork一个出来试试。bts及bta外围进出通道的建立非常重要,gulu,巨蟹,alt的贡献功不可没。希望bts生态能继续完善。

bm提出的bitAsset 3.0貌似更合理一些。但是我对新旧bta同时运行很担心,这毫无疑问会削弱人们接受bta的信心。@alt你怎么看?

11
庄家资金怎么参与?

12
9

13
General Discussion / Re: BitAssets 3.0 - For Community Review
« on: April 24, 2015, 08:11:43 am »
The current BitAsset system will be run in parallel with the new system users can migrate at will.
Interesting. Would the old system ever be completely phased out?

Probably once the shorts unwind and people stop using it.

What if the current BITUSD/BITCNY owner never sell their asset? For example their private key is lost in fire.
So some short seller will have to renew their position forever?

14
谢谢
第2点美元持有者可以要求强制打折结算,具体细节可以在问问BM吗
美元持有者什么条件下可以要求强制打折结算,而空单又是什么条件下被强制结算的
如果都是无条件的,那么空单风险太大了,抵押的BTS时刻有可能被贱卖

打折结算在BM那个bit asset 3.0里面有描述。大概意思就是Bitusd的持有者可以在任何时候预约一个结算安排(placement)以便在24小时之后执行。当这部分Bitusd被执行的时候,抵押率最低的空单会被强制平仓,其中扣除1%的手续费(不知道是给空单持有者还是给系统池子)

BM还提到这个新的bitusd系统会和现有的并行运行,就是说系统里会有bitusd和bitusd3.0两种货币同时流通。不知道能不能有更完美的解决方案。
"The current BitAsset system will be run in parallel with the new system users can migrate at will."
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,15775.msg203661.html#msg203661

第三点提到的CD就是美国的定期存单。美国银行不像我们只分活期和定期,他们有checking account, saving account和CD

15
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 过期单没有变成爆仓单的bug
« on: April 17, 2015, 05:27:10 am »
BM在黑天鹅那篇文章里面讨论过,如果最坏的情况发生,所有BTS的价值不足以覆盖BitCNY、BitUSD等asset的价值,那么应该强行撤销所有Asset,残存的抵押品bts按比例分发给所有Asset持有人
估计现在应该还没实现这个功能

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6