Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ouresw

Pages: [1] 2
1
General Discussion / Re: price feeding review
« on: November 17, 2018, 09:54:04 am »
I find this talk of transparency somewhat disingenuous, as very few witnesses produce a report of their operations periodically.

I will soften that to the extent I don't monitor non-English publications, so if there are non-English witness reports out there, great. Would be nice to see them announced on a prominent platform or in the Bitshares_Witnesses channel of Telegram. I asked one Chinese speaker to translate for me once, but he never followed thru. Neither did I in finding another.

I think Google translate has probably gotten good enough where it is adequate to bridge the language barrier between Mandarin & English now.

I have very consistently published a monthly witness report, I have been more transparent than most witnesses in what I do each month. I have repeatedly stated I use bts_tools for my price feeds. That will change when the MCR fix is released, at which time I will use zapata's price feed script.

I have been publishing my reports on steemit, but given the recent changes on that platform I will be moving to the whaleshares platform. I have no idea which sites Chinese shareholders have access to, given their governments censorship of the internet. I will make it a point to update my witness proposal thread here on this forum, to at least provide a link to my full report on Whaleshares.

I encourage all witnesses to follow the lead of zapata and myself to improve your level of transparency of ALL of your witness operations, at least those that don't compromise security, not just transparency in how you produce feeds.

Maximum respect to you @zapata. As a relatively new witness you set a good example for others to follow.

Good suggestion!But it's best to use the proposal form to determine it.

2
General Discussion / Re: price feeding review
« on: November 17, 2018, 09:45:42 am »
Our views are slowly becoming more consistent in practice. From the beginning of the reform, I have always suggested that without the chain acceptance function, there is no objective judgment on whether the supply of bitCNY is sufficient or not. Based on this, the strength of the negative feedback should not be too large. In addition, the establishment of the chain acceptance function helps the commercialization and promotion of bitCNY. Now I think the most important thing is to discuss the feasibility of accepting on the chain. By the way, we can also "pull it."

WTH? "chain acceptance" "pull it" ? I do agree an lack of objective judgement for BitCNY supply being "sufficient", depends on who you ask. We've heard from bitcrab and his followers. The same thing can be said for all other bit assets.
ha! ha! ha!
The chain acceptance means is Exchange function between bitCNY and French currency,Sorry!  I can't find a word to express this meaning.
As for the translation of <pull it> into Chinese, it is to express that ,"扯一扯"!

3
很高兴看到理事会成员巨蟹也开始呼吁!当时就提出这个要求,现在还是这个要求!在目前的情况下,这是最不坏的方式。

4
中文(Chinese) / Re: 关于新喂价改革可能的做空方式讨论
« on: November 16, 2018, 03:15:57 pm »
当时无人汪意!

5
General Discussion / Re: price feeding review
« on: November 16, 2018, 03:11:34 pm »
Our views are slowly becoming more consistent in practice. From the beginning of the reform, I have always suggested that without the chain acceptance function, there is no objective judgment on whether the supply of bitCNY is sufficient or not. Based on this, the strength of the negative feedback should not be too large. In addition, the establishment of the chain acceptance function helps the commercialization and promotion of bitCNY. Now I think the most important thing is to discuss the feasibility of accepting on the chain. By the way, we can also "pull it."

6
General Discussion / Re: suggest to disable forcesettlement for bitCNY
« on: November 08, 2018, 04:34:18 am »
Chance for speculator to exploit debt position owners is implicit arbitrage and will be healthy for the market. How can it be exploited? The Force Settlement Offset is 5%, which should make it hard enough. Please elaborate

Force settlement is a feature that must remain available IMO, it is a worst-case scenario measure. It will certainly never be used in a liquid market, the UI prominently shows the user if the market is the better choice.
But if there is any incident that the market crashes, the force settlement option must be available and I would not want to wait for anyone to activate it then.

I own a debt position with CR=3, now you force me to sell the collateral to you with a under market price, this is not exploiting, are you joking?

Since you choose to operate this mortgage, you should bear the corresponding risks. If you don't want to be liquidated, you can choose to actively buy back bitCNY to close the position. The rules are fair, and in the current negative feed price mode, liquidation has the effect of accelerating the balance of supply and demand stability of bitCNY, so it cannot be cancelled. Not to mention the forest model, because the liquidation is to give the liquidator the opportunity to close the position.

7
还是改革时的那个意见,在没有建立起内盘承兑及内盘承兑深度的情况下,大幅的调整负喂价反馈,今天的情况在意料之中。因为根本没办法客观的反应bitCNY是否充足。

8
Support for this proposal, but it is recommended that some of the bonuses be paid in the form of bitCNY or bitUSD, which better reflects the theme of this work.

9
新手入门 / 求助一个账号多签问题
« on: September 26, 2018, 04:26:56 pm »
最近有朋友用一个小号练习多签,把这个小号的多签阀值设为10,加入一账号将权重设置为5,同时把这个小号的公钥权重改为6,保存修改之后在做任何操作都提示广播失败。那么这账号是不是就废了。

10
中文(Chinese) / 求助关于账号多签的问题?
« on: September 26, 2018, 04:07:18 pm »
最近有朋友用一个小号练习多签,把这个小号的多签阀值设为10,加入一账号将权重设置为5,同时把这个小号的公钥权重改为6,保存修改之后在做任何操作都提示广播失败。那么这账号是不是就废了。

11
只有公开其喂价计算公式及采集依据,才能让大家投票,撤票都有依据!

12

我有一点不明白,投票为什么是两亿多票就通过,大概是BTS发行量的十分之一,而不是一半呢?是因为大概十个BTS顶一票?还是其他?

另外就是投票里面还有一个反对BSIP42的,如果反对,也可以在这里投票。

至于公开喂价公式,巨蟹的一直都公开了,其他人的估计也差不多一样的,这些没什么好藏着掖着的,唯一的分歧是理念,有的人希望负反馈可以拉升到很高很高,有的人认为不应该。
这个事不能估计,要让各个见证人自己公开并给予确认,然后在社区内公开让大家监督。
如果认为见证人的工作不到位,就撤票呗。(没票等于白说 :-X
撤票也要有依据啊,我们怎么判断他不认真工作,他公开了算法,采集喂价的方式,我们就能监督他是不是认真工作了,到时撤票才客观,而不是看心情,靠猜。
你要求公开,他没公开,就是不认真了。
不撤票,怎么体现你的要求是“强烈要求”?
要求在论坛内开置顶贴 ,用于见证人公开自己喂价公式,及采集依据。不公布的我们就撤票,让他下台。

13
要求在论坛内开置顶贴 ,用于见证人公开自己喂价公式,及采集依据。不公布的我们就撤票,让他下台。

14

我有一点不明白,投票为什么是两亿多票就通过,大概是BTS发行量的十分之一,而不是一半呢?是因为大概十个BTS顶一票?还是其他?

另外就是投票里面还有一个反对BSIP42的,如果反对,也可以在这里投票。

至于公开喂价公式,巨蟹的一直都公开了,其他人的估计也差不多一样的,这些没什么好藏着掖着的,唯一的分歧是理念,有的人希望负反馈可以拉升到很高很高,有的人认为不应该。
这个事不能估计,要让各个见证人自己公开并给予确认,然后在社区内公开让大家监督。
如果认为见证人的工作不到位,就撤票呗。(没票等于白说 :-X
撤票也要有依据啊,我们怎么判断他不认真工作,他公开了算法,采集喂价的方式,我们就能监督他是不是认真工作了,到时撤票才客观,而不是看心情,靠猜。

15

我有一点不明白,投票为什么是两亿多票就通过,大概是BTS发行量的十分之一,而不是一半呢?是因为大概十个BTS顶一票?还是其他?

另外就是投票里面还有一个反对BSIP42的,如果反对,也可以在这里投票。

至于公开喂价公式,巨蟹的一直都公开了,其他人的估计也差不多一样的,这些没什么好藏着掖着的,唯一的分歧是理念,有的人希望负反馈可以拉升到很高很高,有的人认为不应该。
这个事不能估计,要让各个见证人自己公开并给予确认,然后在社区内公开让大家监督。

Pages: [1] 2