1
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
2
BitShares PTS / Re: PTS CUDA GPU Miner PtsGPUz Windows binary version v0.3c (GTX 660 Ti ~880cpm)
« on: January 27, 2014, 08:27:37 am »in file
PtsGPUz v0.3c (2014-01-21), 2.50MB, MD5: cd48298831689962c549f43deaa008cf
have virus
i scan by nod32
Dont worry. it's not a virus, it's a program packer.
3
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] PTS.1GH.COM - GPU mining (Geforce GTX 570 - 960 cpm)
« on: January 26, 2014, 12:24:53 pm »ReorderThere is essentially nothing to tune about the algorithm save for amount of VRAM used, and that the miner tries to adjust automatically. I figure AMD does not give much love to Vista in their drivers anymore, probably you are hitting some driver bug.
Are there any variables we can tune with? One of my Vista64 machines is crashing the display drivers only after 6+ hours of mining. Temps not an issue and I tried the registry fix. Same cards/drivers however with Win7 64 have been running forever without a hitch with your miner.
If it matters I am using 2x HIS 7950's with AMD 13.12 drivers.
I tried your pool today and it works great for me so far. Can you please optimize the miner for gtx660ti? It seems it's possible to get ~850cpm from gtx660ti. Thanks .
4
BitShares PTS / Re: PTS CUDA GPU Miner PtsGPUz Windows binary version v0.3c (GTX 660 Ti ~880cpm)
« on: January 22, 2014, 08:47:18 am »abc123, below is the output for mining on the m2090. Normally I run without the "-t" and "-d" flag, but I have another nvidia GPU so I wanted to isolate the tesla card. Is there anything I can do to help diagnose the m2090 speed?Thank you again.abc123 Can you modify the miner to auto restart when it’s display cudaMemcpy failed, before this ploblem is solved?What version of GTX 580 do you use? Video memory size?
hi, it seems my 660ti doesn't work with your 0.3c version. It has 1152SP and 192bit memory width and 1.5G memory. With 0.3b it can get ~750cpm. With 0.3c it only gets 400cpm. I don't know if you can find the reason just by looking into code. But anyway, thank you for all the efforts.
5
BitShares PTS / Re: PTS CUDA GPU Miner PtsGPUz Windows binary version v0.3c (GTX 660 Ti ~880cpm)
« on: January 21, 2014, 07:48:58 am »
thank you so much for the optimization.
6
BitShares PTS / Re: DO NOT USE PtsGPUz0.3.exe | hidden pts workers
« on: January 15, 2014, 03:18:59 pm »Wow, this is wrong on so many levels. If the developer wants to earn some, he can be upfront about it and leave it up to others to choose a miner.I have write done this in the 3th line of readme file and posts of all 3 version of mine miner.
Like: "A small portion of user's harvest will be mined to author's account in public mining pools as fee."
And the displayed performance is the net performance you get in all 3 version of mine miner.
You did a great job. Do you think 630cpm is the limit of 660ti ?
7
BitShares PTS / Re: ProtoShares CUDA GPU Miner Windows binary version v0.3
« on: January 15, 2014, 03:37:51 am »SP = 1664Yes, I think the performance will be around 1000 CPM.
Memory bus = 384 bit
Memory Frequency = 3700 mhz
Shaders = 512
Clock = 1301 mhz
Disregard price, how well would it perform in PTS mining? ~1000 CPM?
thank you very much for the tool. Can you optimize it for 660ti? I think it should get a similar performance comparing to gtx570.
8
BitShares PTS / Re: ProtoShares CUDA GPU Miner Windows binary version v0.3
« on: January 14, 2014, 04:31:23 am »My Quadro k2000 got 240 cpm. Is this speed normal?Yes, as Quadro k2000 has only 384SP and 128 bit memory bus, for comparison, GTX 660 Ti has 1344SP and 192 bit memory bus.
So memory bus is very important for performance? That explains why GTX570 can get 800+ cpm while GTX660TI can only get 600 cpm?
Pages: [1]
