1
General Discussion / Re: If you need BTSX to finish the registration, Just post your account key here
« on: August 17, 2014, 06:42:26 am »
Account Key: BTSX4vUryC8wxVEGmSRK3BMvnqQkckwYCwcHLN1EnXNqv2baAdyyWr
Thank you
Thank you
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I'm use 280x Gigabyte 4X Each rig i getting 14350 per rig with OCIs there any way to get more than ~3300cpm out of my 290x ?
I tried it with the latest beta driver but it does not make a difference.
I don't have a 290x but I am running a 280x and getting 3,320 cpm so you should be above that. I am using this flag on the x86-64 version -t 1,1 -a 1
I will test it NiceYou Change to 13.2 ?Yep.
You Change to 13.12 ?Change Driver and try
-px -t 0.0,1,1,3 -a 113.12 getting 3500!!! Yesssss
-t 0,0
Changfe your catalyst to it and try!
yessssssssssssssssssss, changed to:
-p x -t 0,0,1,1,3 -a 1
Sitting at ~3400 right now. Thank you both very much.
Change Driver and trydid you run with 2Thread and -a 1 ??This is what I'm using right now:
-p x -t 0,1,3 -a 1
did you run with 2Thread and -a 1 ??Mmm I'll have to try the stable driver release. What flags are you using?I'm Got on win8 with 13.10 280x/1125/1500/3475CPM it very Great PerformanceWow 3450? I'm only getting 2450 on Windows 8 / 14.1 beta drivers...I have seen someone talking of getting 3.5K CPM on a 280X. Has anyone ever heard of that?W7-64-Cata 13.12 / 280X / 1125 core / 1500 mem / 3450 cpm
BTW, AMAZING job on this miner! Keep it coming!!
this 280X-cards are a dream for windows-mining with this fast NaN-miner
my 290X does about the same - NaN suggested a failure in windows compared to linux for this 290X-numbers
Beeeeer Vs YPoolDid you use last version ?? i'm run on win8 it normal not onetime reconnect and out
A little off topic but not so much when NaN's incredible miner only works on these two pools.
I used to mine @ Be^5r a week ago but it seems like they are either offline higher than usual
and now the time between solved blocks is increasing (perhaps due to less miners and technical
difficulties like DDoS). YPool has been pretty darn steady the past three days until yesterday when
clpts says it disconnected, will wait 45 seconds, and then just exit out to the command line.
NaN : How do you handle disconnects from the server? Do you only try one time after 45 seconds
and then just exit out? Last night it happened twice to me and fortunately insomnia had me
restart clpts by hand. Perhaps I should script it to keep trying. I seem to recall someone else
asking about fail-over as well and I suspect this is due to the issues these two pools are having
lately.
Everyone : Which pool do you prefer using, YPool or Be^5r? YPool works so well but I dislike pools
that are too large in fear of block control.
I'm Got on win8 with 13.10 280x/1125/1500/3475CPM it very Great PerformanceWow 3450? I'm only getting 2450 on Windows 8 / 14.1 beta drivers...I have seen someone talking of getting 3.5K CPM on a 280X. Has anyone ever heard of that?W7-64-Cata 13.12 / 280X / 1125 core / 1500 mem / 3450 cpm
BTW, AMAZING job on this miner! Keep it coming!!
this 280X-cards are a dream for windows-mining with this fast NaN-miner
my 290X does about the same - NaN suggested a failure in windows compared to linux for this 290X-numbers