Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - pafnucy

Pages: [1]
1
BitShares PTS / Re: 42 days estimated for Difficulty to retarget. Could this kill PTS?
« on: March 30, 2014, 10:12:43 pm »
Quote from: Zeus on March 30, 2014, 12:04:18 am
Can someone explain me in very simple terms what does "time to retarget 14days" mean? Is there a way someone can watch that if he is not a miner?
Time to retarget is anticipated date when the difficulty of mining drops in some algorithm-defined fashion. Reducing the difficulty increases profits for miners and makes it more attractive to mine as compared to other alt-coins. You can track it here http://mrx.im/pts.php

2
BitShares PTS / Re: 42 days estimated for Difficulty to retarget. Could this kill PTS?
« on: March 29, 2014, 03:11:13 pm »
Blocks to retarget: 1064
Time to retarget: 14d 01:53:27 (2014-04-13 01:59:22 UTC+9)

Are we going to just ride it out? I keep mining as I don't pay for electricity but I am a bit miffed as I continue out of sentiment and not a rational economic decision.

3
BitShares PTS / Re: arCUDAminer 64 bit v1.0e - PTS GPU miner- STABLE - GTX 780 - 2100 CPM
« on: March 24, 2014, 03:39:21 pm »
Your last "soon" was one month ago. Any updates?

4
BitShares PTS / Re: arCUDAminer 64 bit v1.0e - PTS GPU miner for Windows
« on: February 12, 2014, 12:26:44 pm »
So, any news on the update?

5
BitShares PTS / Re: cudaPTSwin - Beeeeer - Fastest optimized PTS GPU miner for windows 64 bit
« on: February 06, 2014, 01:44:02 pm »
I migrated to arcudaminer and ypool due to stability problems. I'd very much prefer to use beeeeer but cudaptswin crashes way too often for me to maintain it.

6
BitShares PTS / Re: cudaPTSwin - Beeeeer - Fastest optimized PTS GPU miner for windows 64 bit
« on: February 01, 2014, 11:27:02 am »
Hi, tesla k20c guy again. I've been getting intermittent "cudaptswin has stopped working" every couple of hours. Nothing on the console, just crashes.

7
BitShares PTS / Re: GPU miners comparsion
« on: January 23, 2014, 02:26:57 pm »
Tested on Tesla K20c / Xeon E5 2620 / 16GB RAM / Win7 x64:

[miner] [version/options] [cpm]
girino OpenCL jhProtominer gpuv6 480
girino OpenCL jhProtominer gpuv6 -m2048 580
girino OpenCL jhProtominer gpuv4 630
girino OpenCL jhProtominer gpuv4 -m2048 640
girino OpenCL jhProtominer gpuv2 410

cudaptswin-SM35 870

cudaptswin-0.4-exp 1250->1160

arCUDAminer 1.0c avx 1180
arCUDAminer 1.0c cm3 avx 1250->1180
arCUDAminer 1.0c highperf avx 1050
arCUDAminer 1.0c highperf cm3 avx around 1070

PtsGPUz 0.3c lit up my antivirus so disqualified

8
BitShares PTS / Re: cudaPTSwin - Beeeeer - Fastest optimized PTS GPU miner for windows 64 bit
« on: January 23, 2014, 02:24:34 pm »
Quote from: crz on January 23, 2014, 02:12:47 pm
Yes, how much GB version you need? :-)
Tesla K20c has 5GB RAM. It could be interesting to test 2GB and 4GB version of the miner if possible.

I don't know if after some point you get diminishing returns in regards to memory capacity.

9
BitShares PTS / Re: cudaPTSwin - Beeeeer - Fastest optimized PTS GPU miner for windows 64 bit
« on: January 23, 2014, 11:35:09 am »
Tested 0.4-experimental on:
Win7 x64, Xeon E5-2620 + Tesla K20c, avx mode
Result:
~1100c/m

I notice that only about 1GB of GPU RAM is used as reported by nvsmi tool. Any chance for a super-high memory version?  8)

Pages: [1]

Page created in 0.194 seconds with 24 queries.