https://www.maidsafe.org/t/bitshare-dns/1686

回复：

I spoke briefly with Dan Larimer ain New York in a post maidsafe presentation (that went mental) and very hectic bunch of excited people. I like Dan, he is a decent guy and very smart. At that time there were people with stopwatches pushing folk away from me after they got 5 mins, it was pretty amazing and very bizaar.

Dan mentioned bitshares dns and I had said it was a discussion point for sure as we were looking at first come first served and similar approaches to public names and I would happily look at his proposals and designs. This is perhaps where the notion of no solid design comes from, but I think it's the opposite we have two very clear options (as well as bitshares if the design was in fact 100% decentralised as all ours must be) and that is allow a single entity unique space (so one janitor and that's gone) or multiple entities with the same name, but different id tokens (which is currently favoured), the latter more faceboook types where you can have many names the same, but with different underlying ID's. In our case the ID's will be separated in the namespace to avoid confusion/phishing etc.. Neither of these is not solid or provably decentralised and correct.

So this is an of course we will look at everything and work with anyone who allows us to reach our goal, but it's not we do not know what we are doing ：） I think the communique is a little misleading perhaps.

Dan has a feeling our economic model is ill thought out or not workable, I don't tend to agree there as I think we seek input but have a pretty solid mechanism of reward that relies on nothing but maths and without judges. It's easy to imagine it is great or flawed, but time will tell and economics is a strange area, too many variables and any expert should he a multi billionaire as far as I can see. Crypto has many poor economic experts which is a weird but enlightening thing ：）

Our approach is look listen measure and move forward, not super fast, but hopefully super aware. This forum is a hugely important part as well as others like bitshares/bitcoin/ethereum and all the rest. I hope it will always be like this. Anyone looking to help and guide the project really needs to be here and inputting to the many debates and design discussions though.

比特币比法币还劣质，想当良币纯属痴心妄想，因为违背基本的经济学原理。正如一台热机违背热力学定律，我大可以贬损它。

用自然科学来跟社会科学比.........

公布私匙


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

RT

Quote from: louisw on August 26, 2014, 09:06:43 pm

Quote from: xeroc on August 26, 2014, 04:37:32 pm

Where did you get the btsx in the first place? Have they been SENT to your accout name? Or did you import PTD/AGS private keys?

 import PTS/AGS private keys

Did you re-import your PTS/AGS keys?   
Did you transfer your 30K BTSX after your original import?

Did you re-import your PTS/AGS keys?   
NO

Did you transfer your 30K BTSX after your original import?
my original import got me 33376BTSX, and i  transfered 3376BTSX to bter.

Go to console
Type
rescan

Watch command "getinfo" until reacan schows 100%(takes some time)

Check balance again

still not work....   no transactions, 0 balance 

so your account still has the address/pubkey after importing? BTSX4yvAV87aSSVBChVs2KXkuEoqikamACT6zZpPmrmHUj6hmvLJCH

YES!

Quote from: xeroc on August 22, 2014, 01:29:22 pm

so your account still has the address/pubkey after importing? BTSX4yvAV87aSSVBChVs2KXkuEoqikamACT6zZpPmrmHUj6hmvLJCH

Which private key did you import?  A PTS/BTC private key?   How did you backup your private key?

If you made a transaction after importing from PTS/BTC and then lost your wallet, then re-importing from PTS / BTC will not help.

i import my BTSX private key!!!