Participate now live:  https://youtu.be/yJm41m4eRak

Quote

"It is a first come — first served auction. How much SOLCERT tokens will be given is dependant on time funds were sent. It will be given the amount available at the price of the particular tier.   If funds will only allow part of a tier, the remaining amount is used in next one.Please e-mail to escrow holder Ronny Boesing ronny@ccedk.com including transaction ID of when funds have been sent.Each buyer will receive in return a e-mail confirmation of amount reserved for final execution on end of presale."

Perfect, Solomon, can you adjust accordingly in text, it does sound better now, thanks.

Sure I will adjust it. Where was the original text that needs to be changed located in? The Medium blog?

https://medium.com/@sollarsandsense/rules-of-solcert-pre-sale-225fdaf5e58a#.fb26o4no0

paragraph 3)

I would appreciate any suggestion on how to rewrite it in order for it to show correctly, then Solomon can do this a.s.a.p. today.

My English is very bad but I think this make more $ense...

"It is a first come — first served auction. How much SOLCERT tokens will be given is dependant on time funds were sent. It will be given the amount available at the price of the particular tier.   If funds will only allow part of a tier, the remaining amount is used in next one.Please e-mail to escrow holder Ronny Boesing ronny@ccedk.com including transaction ID of when funds have been sent.Each buyer will receive in return a e-mail confirmation of amount reserved for final execution on end of presale."

This is just another example of the

"Doing the things the crazy, the Ronny way"

 [I realy realy hope not!] but judging by the explanation... if I send my funds now, but fail to send an email [or ronny somehow fails to read it on time  ] other people will get the tokens before me.... and I will be credited as of the time my EMAIL is read ...and be charged say 2.5 BTS/Solarcert

Tell me I read the instructions wrong!


"Whomever is sending the orders first by e-mail to escrow holder Ronny Boesing ronny@ccedk.com including transaction ID of when funds have been sent, will be given the amount available at the price of the tier in question."

"What English is this is", btw, I never read about any tier being in question, questionable...or mentioned before that statement ...

It is very easy to identify which one deserves what, since it is all open in openledger....
I assume they just didn't express it well.It doesn't make  $ense if they will only look the email orders !!!
after all they stated also "This is dependant on time funds were sent."

BUT yes, very bad written!


PS indeed if it is like you said. I am out of this and will stop promoting it.

ZERO-FEE transactions


Moto:
ZERO-FEE are FREE !!!

trade volume is also easily faked

thats true !

Maybe that is one more reason to use both parameters... Volume + Marketcap (with a 70%-30% weight or something like that)
we could optimally  use even  more data, to choose the top cryptos for our bit20 index but I am afraid it will get too complicated ...

a very good example of doing this "pickup"  is
https://cyber.fund/

they seem to have made a good job with "Scoring Coefficients"
https://github.com/cyberFund/cyberrating/blob/master/scoring.md

In reality they could  (@21xhipster) already use their idea and link their "cyber-fund" with a BTS created smartcoin  instead of a UIA they created using "colored coins"...
I bet they would gain much more traction from the cryptospace   

    for the initiative !!!


some thoughts...

I think if you want to stick to the "best" 20 crypto's you should use the first 20 with the biggest volume NOT the 20 with the  biggest marketcap.... because we will see many shitcoins on the list very often....
if bit20 is depended from marketcap only it will be very misleading...  And not only use the 24h volume of course... we can use the top 20 crypto with the biggest weekly or monthly volume....

if you want to stick only with the marketacap then I prefer a bit10 index instead of the bit20 so that crap coins get out-filtered... 

Quote from: yvv on March 18, 2016, 02:23:07 pm

Quote from: lil_jay890 on March 18, 2016, 11:43:34 am

Hmmm wonder where all the bts bulls went that said I wasnt "acting like a trader" because I was bearish bts...

You were not bearish. You were whining about the price bouncing down after pump, "oh shit, how a trader is supposed to act???" Oh yeah, this happens for the first time, what a confusion for professional traders!!! lol

I said sell on March 10th at 20 million and buy back when it reaches 10 million and double your shares...  But I guess in your world predicting a price drop doesn't mean being bearish.

How should have i put it in order to make it clearer for you??

Are you still suggesting to buy at 10M? (I am asking due to the tank for all crypto's right now...)