Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - liondani

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ... 250
362
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: ubuntu mistakes muse for some kind of midi editor
« on: November 06, 2015, 01:44:45 pm »
I have linux-mint sorry... ("menu" is like the windows "start" button but on linux mint....)
when the update window pop up (that's the "update manager") go to

edit>preferences>Ignored updates>add>muse>apply

363
General Discussion / Re: Best Exchange Website
« on: November 06, 2015, 12:46:51 pm »
A "Best Exchange Poll" already effectively exists and it constantly updated: just look at volume.  People trade at their preferred exchange and "vote" with their dollars and satoshis.

That is really a good (maybe optimal) metric!

PS metatrader4 is sure on top of the list...
      I would say the best combination is metatrader4  + polo-like web gui

364
People coming to OL would not see this interface. It would be ppl already using metatrader. I not a pro trader and don't use metatrader, but I don't see the harm in letting it pluginbto BitShares. Crypto users will still have their interface.

 +5% exactly

365
OpenLedger / Re: Constructive criticism creating synergies!
« on: November 06, 2015, 09:24:18 am »
The assumption of CCEDK users by now all know about OpenLedger from various news letters and has an interest in knowing more about Openledger and the smartcoins, as well as the excitement from our side to share the news, is why we felt no reason not to share this easy acces to smartcoins via btc instant order feature on CCEDK.
I think the general expectation was that CCEDK would fully migrate to OL. That did not happen. But as it is entirely your business decision, I'm not criticizing that.
All I'd like to point out, is the external user perspective: from the outside it looks inconsistent because OL was strongly advertised (before the launch) as a significant improvement over centralized exchanges. So the perception is this: you advertise something but you yourself are not really using it. Once again, business-wise it might make sense. I'm just telling you how it might be perceived by the outside world. And perception does matter, even if it's irrational. So if you need to keep CCEDK, just don't associate it with OL, that's all that's needed to alleviate most of the confusion.

 +5%

@ccedk Have you thought to fully migrate? I think that would be wise... (Just my personal opinion not knowing the details)

PS would you do that if CNX made a better deal to you???

366
I think the advanced trading interface (screen shots provided) is terrible for 99% of crypto users / traders.   But it may well be the best for technical traders / day traders.

I think that if our interface looked like what I saw above we would be getting all kinds of complaints from far more users.   The interface is just too busy. 


I am not saying that we shouldn't have such a product.

I think we should look at etrade, etc as examples.   The market for the interface shown above is willing to PAY big dollars to have something that has every bell and whistle.

I can see tremendous value in making the exchange data available in a format that is easily integrated with external interfaces.

That's what I'm saying... you guys don't have time to design something like mt4... and you shouldn't spend time doing this because it is already done.  All we need is account and price data that can be fed to this platform.

Many people may think MT4 is too cluttered, but truth is you can make it as complicated or simple as you want.  Please please please don't think etrade is a good interface.  Interfaces like poloniex and etrade would never be taken seriously by professional traders.

Traders and brokers have ton's of options to choose from as far as trading platforms.  There is a reason that MT4 is the defacto standard.

Bottom line:  make a standard low tech interface for the default wallet, but allow other 3rd party platforms to access price and account data for more intricate and capable trading.

I am shocked to recognize that bytemaster seems not  not to be aware that metatrader4  is the defacto standard for traders... (and not only for the professional traders!)
And it is a standard for a reason!....


PS here are 2 another exchange platforms worth mentioning ...

http://www.cmcmarkets.co.uk/en/trading-platforms
https://ct.pepperstone.com/

367
what think @bytemaster  about this?

368
Yeah, okay. Well, THAT's a trading engine, isn't it? So I guess that's what our GUI needs to look like if we're going to attract serious traders?

No, we don't need that GUI. BTC-E is compatible with it but most people don't use it.
I would say you just need a sufficient GUI which right now we don't have yet. We don't even have a troll box yet.

It doesn't matter! It is enough that they know "It supports metatrader"
It gives confidence to know that a particular exchange supports metatrader!
Just ask trader's....


 +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% for metatrader support.  I really think if we do it, we will  get much attention from trader's but from the media also!

369
why not just offer a "simple" interface and a trading interface?

I believe our current GUI would work as a simple interface...  But we are far far away from a usable traders interface.  Having something similar to Metatrader directly in the native wallet would be the most desirable solution, but I don't think it is realistic.  Metatrader took years to develop.  I believe using a 3rd party "interface in a box" that plugs into our API for data, would be the most efficient solution.  I also think it would expedite achieving acceptable liquidity for trading on our DEX.

 +5% +5% +5%


370
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: ubuntu mistakes muse for some kind of midi editor
« on: November 04, 2015, 08:51:03 pm »
had same problem...

go to:
 menu>administration>update manager>edit>preferences>Ignored updates>add>muse>apply

371
The power users for bitshares are altcoin traders.
Altcoin traders like poloniex and it doesn't matter if altcoin traders like it for irrational reasons, they just like it.
Longer term bitshares market maybe forex trading but for now we should target altcoin traders directly.

This means copying exactly what poloniex do.

we need a normal login like they have.
we need 2fa like they have.
we need a fee structure like they have.
we need a GUI like them with a troll box


 +5%
... would be a good start

372
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: November 04, 2015, 11:57:37 am »
I leave town for one day and you all let the bottom fall out.   

If there is a market need for what BitShares solves then BTS has a future.  If there isn't a market need then it will remain small serving a niche.  The need for BTS is in times of crisis where decentralized exchanges are needed because all of the centralized exchanges fall down.

.. then lets make try and make the front end as easy and intuitive as possible for the non technical folks who dont give a damn about trading and just want to salvage whatever worthless dollars they still have in to gold and silver. [/color] I can do this in less that 5 clicks with bitreserve.

BM just said bitshares gains it's value from being an exchange when all centralized exchanges fail... that would lead me to believe we should skip making it for the average idiot, and tailor it to traders.

Metatrader 4 is the best trading platform I have used.  It's intuitive yet advanced.  Indicators are easy to write in mql4 and the barrier to entry is low.  There have been thousands of indicators created by regular traders.  I know people think poloniex has a great interface, but to tell you the truth, it's garbage.  It's boring, plain, and isn't even on par with basic broker platforms from companies like e-trade much less something like Metatrader.

If I showed the current interface to forex traders they would laugh.  There are no indicators(not even a moving average), no ability to zoom or pan, orders can't be executed by clicking on the chart, there is no line on the chart indicating where your open positions cost is, no active P/L, no grid option, no dynamic scaling, no ability to change bar colors, no ability to change to line or OHLC style charts.  And I can't stress enough that if you want to appeal to traders you need to be able to accommodate stop and take profit orders for open positions!  This is by far the main and most important thing to get functioning if you want traders.  Most of the other stuff a trader doesn't absolutely need to trade, but they need stops and take profits.

Seriously just look at metatrader 4... download it and open a demo account from one of the dozens of forex brokers that use metatrader as their platform (I use FXCM and Forex.com).  Give it a test run and you will see what trading platform needs to be at a minimum.  Unless we don't want traders, then all this is null and void.
You can even use mt4 as a frontend with any server side clearing software that plugs into the api... So you can use bitshares as the server giving trade information to mt4 which executes the trades and allows backtesting and algorthmic trading and development. This is a great idea... Ive said 100x gui coding is harder than you think unless you become a gui programmer. So leverage guis that work and mt4 clearly does.

@lil_jay890
@jsidhu

 +5% +5% +5% +5%  for both of you for your suggestion's

PS I still can't understand why we want to invent the wheal again...   Let's combine bts2 vs Metatrader!   Superb idea !!!!!!!!!!



373
General Discussion / Re: Looking for BTS 2.0 Seed Node Operators
« on: November 03, 2015, 11:01:25 pm »
Seed node 185.25.22.21:1776 located in Greece
updated to the new version:  BitShares 2.0.151101

Code: [Select]
./witness_node --rpc-endpoint 127.0.0.1:1777 -s 104.236.144.84:1776 --p2p-endpoint 0.0.0.0:1776

374
General Discussion / Re: BitShares 2.0.151101 released
« on: November 03, 2015, 07:04:24 pm »
updated to BitShares 2.0.151101 and waiting for your votes....

If you want more security and more diversity for bts2 consider to vote for witness "liondani:)
I had two delegates in my control on bts1, delegate.liondani & jcalfee1-developer-team.helper.liondani

get_witness liondani
{
  "id": "1.6.48",
  "witness_account": "1.2.376",
  "last_aslot": 0,
  "signing_key": "BTS6zT2XD7YXJpAPyRKq8Najz4R5ut3tVMEfK8hqUdLBbBRjTjjKy",
  "vote_id": "1:59",
  "total_votes": "2437779856840",
  "url": "https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,6406.msg245698.html#msg245698",
  "total_missed": 0,
  "last_confirmed_block_num": 0
}

375
General Discussion / Re: If you are a Brownie holder
« on: November 03, 2015, 02:11:52 pm »
I want to make you all ridiculously wealthy because all too often in life those who sacrifice everything are left with nothing. 

 :'(

you must be on drugs...


PS please wait until we rise a little  ... then continue

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ... 250