Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - liondani

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 249
76
General Discussion / Re: STEEM price discussion
« on: April 22, 2016, 10:42:52 am »
Just to set things straight here. I was asked weeks ago if I would be ready to have an article put through on STEEM via Forbes. I was also told that OpenLedger was meant to be first platform to trade STEEM.

None of this has happened, and whatever is the reason for BiTTREX to be the first, you all need to take up with the people orchestrating this, meaning [member=11]dannotestein[/member] [member=5]bytemaster[/member] [member=22354]nedscott[/member]

I am enjoying to help promote BitShares and OL on top, but as I have mentioned in previous threads whenever there is a hidden agenda and i feel someone here have been playing on many horses and really made a bad impression on it all.

I hope it will improve soon in terms of how communication has been presented, and I hate to waste my own time and anyone else's for that matter thinking we are on the same page, when in fact someone has already witten the end of the story on his own.

[member=23432]ccedk[/member]
Just tell us when deposits and withdrawal's are allowed on OL and we will take of OPEN.STEEM after that... don't worry!

77
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: April 21, 2016, 01:46:42 pm »
I think steem will share the same fate of all the reddit clone.

but if not... well  8)

79
General Discussion / Re: STEEM price discussion
« on: April 21, 2016, 11:55:05 am »
I thought the point of Steem was to attract users to trade a hot new token on OpenLedger, and they just use Bittrex instead?  >:(

Unfortunately Bittrex open Steem trading first.  >:(

actually [member=23432]ccedk[/member] should give the option to deposit/withdraw STEEMs ...
else why should they choose openledger over bittrex?

80
General Discussion / Re: STEEM price discussion
« on: April 21, 2016, 08:04:11 am »
I think they will be forced to change their accounting out of the sheer ridiculousness of their ranking of Steem vs the rest of the market.

from the other side it will attract many new speculators due to the currently super "low valuation"  ...

81
General Discussion / Re: STEEM price discussion
« on: April 21, 2016, 07:48:42 am »
Can somebody explain me how the supply changed in one day from 334000 STEEMs to 402000 STEEMs?
It is 25% in on day! I thought the dilution per day is about 0.3% (113% per year)...I am sure I am missing something  :)


82
General Discussion / STEEM price discussion
« on: April 21, 2016, 07:42:02 am »
Do you think STEEM stays for ever on a  300K marketcap?


http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/steem/#markets

83
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: April 21, 2016, 07:35:43 am »

84
Well, now, that was an interesting read!!!!

Yes indeed !!!

85
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: April 20, 2016, 08:21:26 pm »
BTS going up today while Bitcoin rises is the strangest thing ever.

trap(?)

86
wanted to chime in, too :)

very interesting project, I will also update the bts_tools package to publish this feed and will publish it myself once I get around to do it. At the moment, I'm right in the middle of a refactoring + adding support for steem, so it'll take a couple more weeks I imagine, but you can count me in!
Thanks !!! I will !

I guess we won't wait much more. The script is in the Mindphlux hands ;)

This is just quick solution to avoid more delays. I have something better in the pipeline for publishing the price in a completely decentralised way but alowing me to add easily more code in the index revision system if needed without having to update the scripts with all the witnesses everytime.



Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

can't wait to buy some!!!  +5% +5% +5%

87
Bytemaster has been saying for months that:

BitShares needs to stabilize and stop "innovating".
Sidechains are the proper way to expand.
He will continue to innovate (it's what he does).
He will be there when BitShares needs him.

Funny, no one mentions the other bombshell today... hint:  it ends in "3.0".

Bytemaster makes babies and leaves it to others to raise them.
That's because he is the best choice for the first and the worst choice for the second.

We all benefit when BM makes babies because we find out about them first and we know their daddy well.

He will make us many babies if he is free to innovate. 
What do you think his talent will be worth if chained to maintaining a stabilized BitShares?

BitShares is in the hands of mere mortal entrepreneurs like you and me now.
And we are exactly what it needs at this point in time.

:)

Exactly how many more people besides BM can take over development of major new features in a way consistent with the current codebase?

In other words, who else really groks the code?

thereverseflash looks to be pretty effective

Perhaps we could have a bidding war to lure him over to Bitshares?

Since he's BM it would be hard I guess ;)

I hope he will not issue updated flash-colored-brownies2 IUAs and will stay with the first version of it!




89
General Discussion / Re: how to mine steem
« on: April 18, 2016, 10:52:21 am »
My wild speculation is that when you funded STEALTH you were unaware of another DAC being concurrently developed. I think it's a possibility you have been given some of the 80% of STEEM they initially mined themselves (& obfuscated in their Bitcointslk announcement) as some form of compensation, hence your multiple post support for a DAC  that I would think you would otherwise not be thrilled about in your position.

I am sure! (or something similar)  +5%
I can't  find myself another explanation   :)

90
General Discussion / Re: Whale Powered Assets
« on: April 18, 2016, 07:38:51 am »
Maybe the whale could burn all dilution related Bts.

WOW !!!  I think we are now close...


Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 249