Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - deer

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
16
我说得直接一些,按百分比收费就是BTS2.0高手续费这个错误决策前提下的伪优化需求。

我们现在面临的问题:钱包为什么一直没有客户?
那要看看哪些情况下可以吸引客户,我觉得诱因从高到低如下:

1.应用产生的强需求:比如跨国汇款、gamble、事实竞猜。因为历史缘故(如1.0钱包不给力、2.0转账费高、策略重点偏向引荐人这种空泛的方向)这些应用至少现在还没成型,但以后发展起来肯定是吸引客户最主要的手段。我09年开始用京东,因为它满59免运费而且第二天就能送达,它在手机支付不发达的年代支持货到刷卡、它自营的东西有保障。这些都是京东融了钱真实用给客户的。如果京东一开始收我100元快递费,现在变成收我20元,我会因为这个去投向它的怀抱?

2.提供新客户买单费用:如注册、体验转账送红包等(这个更没影了,不向客户收费算不错了,这都做不到)。这种模式可以快速吸引客户,但没有第1点的保障流失率会很高。

3.吸引BTS的投机者。想炒这个币,部分客户还是会体验一下钱包做得怎么样的。本来3秒转账是个亮点,尼玛一看转一发要30BTS,给人坑爹的错觉,不玩了。所以连我现在一般两个月开一次钱包领取冻结的余额转时代,减少操作频次。其实30bts没多少钱,就是数字敏感,感觉不爽。

[member=18687]abit[/member]我佩服你的技术。但是你提出的方案其实是建立在高收费和引荐人制度这种YY出来的理想主义错误模式下的。而且,重点是我感觉你和BM他们一样陷入了一个认为底层功能可以改变现状思维怪圈。想着法子做底层功能增发,吸干本来就没剩多少的市值。

300万的BTS说实话不多,但是“增发”给市场带来的失望预期肯定不止这些。我们现在仅有的“用户”只剩第3种了,还要吓跑他们吗? :'(

我的结论是:统一降低手续费,杜绝一切非必要的增发。至少我们把第3种客户发展起来,巨蟹他们的应用才有成长的土壤啊。

17
还是没明白为什么不愿意走FBA。你认为自己开发的功能有盈利的能力完全可以通过FBA赚更多啊。
还是你觉得这只是个花头,根本没人会用,最终受益肯定不及申请worker。

18
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: January 27, 2016, 02:18:17 am »
Why bm can sell angel fund to cover personal expense?Is this suppose to belong to the community?

19
So why devs go by FBA? Do you think your work are not good enough to attract outside fund yourself?

We continue dilution to "pay" the dev for 2.5 years and the market cap drop down by 95%.

That 's the meaning we pay? I am so confused.

Maybe the dev and the "loyalty supporter" don't hold any bts at all.  Any method to dilution and quickly cash out by is the goal.

such hypocritical

20
General Discussion / Re: why bts lack users????????
« on: January 22, 2016, 03:34:34 pm »
"Cryptonomex" is  trying to "save" BitShares by tech,But also destroying the whole by endless inflation、merge、waste of funding、uncertain rules、terrible pr、disrespect to investor at the same time.

Dev Code for this project and get money,easily change the rule if can't get enough!!

What do we got after as investor since 2013? losing 80% of the money?That 's what we suppose to have?

Look at the cap、the amount of users. Who should blame for this??? the bankrupt investor???

21
General Discussion / Re: why bts lack users????????
« on: January 22, 2016, 03:37:06 am »
burn the stupid worker fund pool!and announce that never inflation!anyone want to make profit can do FBA or app and fund from outside!(if you can't,how dare you can say it's a “good” project) and  I think the hitory fund can at least give us a full api and stable wallet ,right?

3 “inlfation years” has past ,we can barely take it any more .
I think it is the only way out


22
General Discussion / Re: exchange preparing for voting
« on: January 12, 2016, 09:06:21 am »
Haven't BM ever used the community-fund bts to vote for himself?
some people are just double standard,funny. 8)

23
General Discussion / Re: The Benefits of Proof of Work [BLOG POST]
« on: January 06, 2016, 02:34:17 pm »
"We" have a great idea,but lack of money    --------PTS
Oh wait!
"We" haven't get enough fund through the rule we make !
blame to the envil miner!
it 's fine,let 's change the rule  to...              --------AGS
yeah!we have money now....whatever you can do to contribute the community we can offer you a big sum of money!
brian page,toast,the bitgold gateway guy....
It 's all right,cause we are the "new money" guy!
Oh shit! We are running out of fund!
it 's fine,let 's change the rule  to...              --------merge+delegate pay
pay by the "blockchain"!(or the poor invetment people who got involved since 2013?)  genius?haha!?
Oh,no! the price keeps going down!why?this is such a good product!
we should blame for the market!it has noting to do with the merge and dilution...
but the delegate pay can't fit our STOMACH now!
it 's fine,let 's change the rule  to...              ------worker propsal
you poor investment people don't vote for me to get a big sum of money
I will leave the product half cooked and we  can go to the ideal of communism together and forget our invetment

now again,I have a great new idea.     
                                                            it has nothing to do with dilution...

24
大锅饭的效率。。历史上已经有教训了 现在的价格就是恶性循环的表现 再不改变就要一起死了支持撤销通胀!!


从我的 iPhone 发送,使用 Tapatalk

25
DAC 委托人 / Re: 2月评估
« on: February 16, 2015, 02:56:57 pm »
从ebit提供的工作业绩上看,Gandalf从去年八月份就没做任何贡献了,确定配得上100%受托人吗

26
DAC 委托人 / Re: 2月评估
« on: February 13, 2015, 07:57:03 am »
比较关心btsnow做了什么 4个人每人一个100%受托人呢!!!!!!

27
@Excoin you think 2000usd per month is such a low payment,right?
Well,I have one question:Since your website is all about nubit and blackcoin and how much do their community pay you????????

28
中文(Chinese) / Re: 黑潮实验室
« on: January 06, 2015, 02:14:52 am »
看了半天 没看出要对BTS要做什么贡献
交易对bter yunbi早就有了 BTC38还支持Bitcny充值。黑潮交易量有他们大?

29
15 Mil BTS and 100K annual pay for the marketing guy that did nothing.......

God,Finally I found the reason why the price of bts keeps going down and why we are running out of ags FUND :'(

30
id:kobe

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5