no update

PTS 200w GPU挖的bug？阴谋？
Keyhotee 胎死腹中
AGS   AGS fund如何耗尽 没有可持续发展
2.28 snapshot btsx 400w
6月还是7月 btsx发布 扩大500倍  20亿
14年8月26 炒到3毛多
10月还是11月的合并 dns 和vote
后来muse play众筹
15年9月？ bts2.0  石墨烯
16年 4月？ bm拍拍屁股走了


时代 btc38 现在有6亿bts

持仓账户数
8764
持仓总币数
601339499.2
人均持币
68614.73
24小时资金流入
148970 CNY
24小时资金流出
154249 CNY
24小时资金变化
-5280 CNY
一周资金流入
711004 CNY
一周资金流出
1431007 CNY
一周资金变化
-720004 CNY

well , it translates the same in Chinese at least . "learn from bitshares' failures " = "learn from the reasons why bitshares has failed "

i'm sure if his English could be better he'd use the word "mistakes" instead of "failures" .

Anyway , he's right about one sentence : technology can not fix dumb people .
The difference between DAO and BTS is that , BTS didn't have a 6 million USD budget in the first place , it's just in BM's imagination . The dilution plan was accepted reluctantly by the community only because of :
1. BM will perform some big thing with vote , millions of users will be using BTS , hence any reputation cost by the merger and continue dilution could be compensated .
2. Upon the delivery of 2.0 , BM magically proposed that to unleash the delegate-by-delegate dilution to worker dilution , with a misleading promise that all dilution will be vested for years , no selling pressure .

After the two promises were broken , he still convinced that he has 6 million budget to spend . This is what I called "wishful thinking" .

Anyway , I don't believe the future holds for The DAO .  But what BM said regarding the "failures" of BItShares and blame it on "dumb people" are just plain stupid .


By the way , how's brownie.pts going ? As far as we know , nobody is controlling brownie.pts except BM . He can dilute it to support development . How come brownie.pts hasn't been successful already

AGS fund was  wasted  dry


dns  vote  nothing added to bts

PTS AGS BTS  DNS VOTE MERGE  bigthing
AGS fund dry

too  young too simple  sometimes  naive

Quote from: Stan on April 27, 2016, 08:11:05 am

Quote from: karnal on April 27, 2016, 07:59:15 am

Quote from: bytemaster on April 26, 2016, 10:00:59 pm

I think the future is pretty clear for BTS:

1. work out the kinks with Steem
2. merge best parts of steem + BTS into a next generation DEX
3. sharedrop + dev allocation

It is just a much longer roadmap.

How can Steem "a social media platform where everyone gets paid for creating and curating content." be meaningfully merged with BTS? The two seem completely unrelated ..

It's a shame you seem to feel the need to switch direction every few months BM. I like your vision (or should it be: "the previous vision"?) and certaintly you have the skills to pull it off, but appear to lack the tenacity to see the project through to the end.

I don't know how it went from "fuck the banks we don't need them anymore and lets build financial freedom together" to "lets pay people for blogging"..

Pretty easy really.  Got to make payroll and put food on the table. 

Funny how few people there are in this world who understand what it's like to be responsible to the shareholders and employees of a company.

That's what I told the DNS victims  ..........
I guess someday there will be people telling STEEM holders that exact same line   

big thing 2.0

is muse die？

one year

Quote from: ripplexiaoshan on May 23, 2016, 04:36:38 pm

It's not cool for BM to blame the community or "dumb people" for the "mistakes" of BTS, instead of thinking of  his own mistake for not fully discussing with community when he made those big decisions.

not cool at all .
I can not explain enough to people without wasting my time why bitshares' founder has announced the "bitshares' failures" .

after all  , a large part of BM's own mistakes wasn't even mentioned in the article . I had to teach them the history over and over again until they realized : oh , it's BM who failed , not bitshares , and it seems STEEM is not something we should remotely consider to invest in given the history .