Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - svk

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 133
91
General Discussion / Re: Bin backup format
« on: February 20, 2017, 08:34:53 am »
My guess is a lot of the things that seem redundant deal with complex wallets with many accounts, and especially the accounts imported from BTS 1 where you would have private keys that did not directly correspond to an account for example.

Linked accounts are a way to track accounts added manually via private key iirc.

The private keys array can contain keys added manually that do not belong to the brain key of the wallet. When you load such a wallet the GUI makes an api call to find out which of those private keys have accounts associated with them, and it also tracks the accounts that don't in order to not look them up more than once.

92
General Discussion / Re: bitshares asset KAPITAL can't sell???
« on: February 20, 2017, 08:25:40 am »
The question of how he was able to buy it in the first place remains..

93
General Discussion / Re: OPENBTC vs OPEN.BTC
« on: February 18, 2017, 09:01:31 am »
OPENBTC is deprecated, it was their first asset. Use OPEN.BTC instead.

94
Technical Support / Re: trying to import private key into bishares 2.0
« on: February 16, 2017, 09:33:43 pm »
Try to export the json file from the 0.9.3 client,  most likely your account had many more private keys due to TITAN.

95
Technical Support / Re: trying to import private key into bishares 2.0
« on: February 16, 2017, 09:33:39 am »
If the private key is from Bitshares 1.0 it won't do you much good I think, try checking this out: http://docs.bitshares.eu/bitshares/migration/howto-exporting-wallet.html

Did you try to import the key in the settings though?


96
General Discussion / Re: skills required for developing a new user interface?
« on: February 08, 2017, 11:48:04 pm »
It's made in javascript,  using React.

97
General Discussion / Re: Suggestion about DEX usability for guests
« on: February 05, 2017, 06:28:09 pm »
It's certainly possible for them to do it the same way,  it's a one line code change.

98
General Discussion / Re: Suggestion about DEX usability for guests
« on: February 05, 2017, 07:57:55 am »
It's true,  send them to bitshares.org/wallet instead,  it only redirects to the create account page when you're at the root, so you can link to a market for example.

99
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] New GUI development worker
« on: February 01, 2017, 05:22:59 pm »
A new release is now available for Windows and Linux, Mac coming tomorrow.

https://steemit.com/bitshares/@svk/bitshares-gui-release-2-0-170201

100
General Discussion / Re: Suggestion about Max Supply of UIA
« on: February 01, 2017, 07:16:58 am »
Quote from: nmywn on January 31, 2017, 10:38:35 pm
Leave it as is and add lock supply flag for those who want.
@fav not in GUI for sure.

Not in the GUI since it's not in the blockchain either,  needs to be added.

101
General Discussion / Re: Suggestion about Max Supply of UIA
« on: January 31, 2017, 05:11:23 pm »
I agree, the default behavior should be as you describe with max supply locked, with perhaps a permission flag that could be set on creation that would enable the issuer to change it later.

102
General Discussion / Re: Pegged Cryptocurrencies for Remittances
« on: January 31, 2017, 07:04:44 am »
Quote from: Brekyrself on January 30, 2017, 08:29:53 pm
Quote from: JianJolly on January 30, 2017, 08:34:42 am
Quote from: Brekyrself on January 30, 2017, 07:55:55 am
Even if OpenLedger were to disappear, what stops another gateway from stepping up and accepting Open assets in exchange for their asset?   Trades on Open assets generate a fee given to the issuer, another gateway could simply swap these out.  open.steem vs BitUSD would become blocktrades.steem vs BitUSD for example.

The issuer holds the reserve backing the asset. If the issuer disappears, it also means that the reserve disappears. Without the reserve, another exchange cannot offer the service you mention.


Quote from: GChicken on January 30, 2017, 12:00:47 am
Quote from: svk on January 29, 2017, 06:40:26 pm
and without liquidity its even riskier since you may not be able to close your positions.
i would like to clarify this by saying that position can always be settled 1:1 for the underlying collateral; this is not a market sell operation but a smart contract that will destroy the smartcoin being settled and release the collateral to the settler at the price feed.

I think the hypothetical situation he refers involves the inability to get back the bitassets after creating and spending them. So, the question is: What if I buy all those $100k-worth bitUSD, and refuse to give them back? Creators of the bitassets would be willing to give more than 1 USD per 1 bitUSD, because according to their contract, they may get $2-worth of BTS per bitUSD. So this is a lose-lose situtation.

Can the fee pools be publicly funded as a way to jump start dead assets?  This would be a fail safe if the initial issuer disappeared?

Anyone can fund a fee pool  but if Openledger went bankrupt OPEN.BTC would still be worthless.

103
Technical Support / Re: !!! Stupid Questions Thread !!!
« on: January 31, 2017, 06:54:44 am »
Quote from: JonnyBitcoin on January 31, 2017, 05:21:51 am
If someone created a BTC.UIA  with zero trade fee and zero deposit/withdraw fee
Would Openledger be able to do anything stop it trading with their UIAs

I'm pretty sure the answer is no but is there something clever that could be done with blacklisting or transfer freezing that could prevent it?

The answer is yes,  they could blacklist it which would prevent trading.

104
General Discussion / Re: Things that needs to be fixed with bitshares
« on: January 29, 2017, 10:24:05 pm »
Quote from: oakmaster on January 29, 2017, 09:06:07 pm

Maybe Im just confused and just want to see if Im correct being a LT member you get 80% of your paid transaction fees back after a certain time of vesting now Im not complaining because its money in the bank but what I was asking is if I where to collect the vesting fees its 200 bts trans fee which is pretty high if your transaction fee to collect your balance is higher than your balance

Sent from my LG-K540 using Tapatalk

Yes,  it's a stupid high fee which will create another vesting balance since you get 80% of it back.  Rinse and repeat ad infinitum.  Makes claiming small vesting balances not worth it.

105
General Discussion / Re: Things that needs to be fixed with bitshares
« on: January 29, 2017, 08:29:48 pm »
Quote from: oakmaster on January 29, 2017, 07:03:18 pm
K thanks I thought part of paying to be a lifetime member was to get some of your transaction fees back guess thats not the case

Sent from my LG-K540 using Tapatalk

No you do get them back if you're a lifetime member,  80% or whatever it is,  but you still need to pay the full fee first.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 133

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 23 queries.