又搬出“中国人”来了。。。。。
或许沈波先生接到的任务和工作是市场推广方面，并不负责调解投资者的矛盾或者疑问的呢。。。
能不能表达情绪之前，先问问这个事情沈波先生是不是有负责或者有责任参与进来的？问个问题很难吗？
如果是，那再开骂不行？。。。。如果不是，那也不见骂错人的会道歉啊！？。。

有争论，发表声音很重要，理越辩越明，Stan和BM的初衷亦是如此。

但希望大家在发表意见的时候保持冷静和克制，带有情绪和偏见的言论显然无法讨论出双赢的结果。

不管是大户还是小散，在漫长的等待中，都充满希望，同时又屡屡收获失望，目标太宏伟，实现的过程中难免会有曲折反复，个中滋味只有操刀者明白（就像上司给下属安排了一个任务，在上司眼里，就这么个小事情还倒腾这么久，下属会怎么想？事情做起来肯定是有个过程的，过程中出了点岔子，反复是难免的，但为了完成好-不是应付-任务只能硬着头皮拖一拖。在比特股项目上，我们不懂技术的投资者就是那个结果思维的上司，不妨换位思考一下）。

其实大家都是一样的心情，都希望项目顺利，运行良好！
谁都不希望这个项目以失败告终，这不符合当初投资的初衷。
唱衰对谁都没有好处！不符合个人利益。

都忍耐到这个时候了，bitshares XT 也已经在有序的测试当中，测试暴露出了一些问题，但在推进就是好消息。
在这个节骨眼上唯有“信任之”才会出现对大家都好的一个结果。

 

Would anybody send me more 2 xts for registering a delegater? Thanks
XTS6iHycdbBb1kHs9K6fpg3G9EM7XqEWvoGhp6b91Q5ABCCzfbudN

XTS6iHycdbBb1kHs9K6fpg3G9EM7XqEWvoGhp6b91Q5ABCCzfbudN
send some xts for my testing, thanks

看到这边文章才知道为什么3i要搬到香港了

为什么啊？望赐教。

以比特币区块链为主链，其他存在多条不同类型的区块链，相互之间无缝配合，共同组成一个大的去中心化数字世界。
太棒了！

Why only one TLD?

There is a pretty good discussion here you might want to read first: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=3652.0

The short answer is, if you look at what distinct TLDs actually do in real life, it's to establish different *rulesets* for how the namespace is managed. The fact that it can be used to avoid name collisions is a *secondary effect* and an artifact of how traditional DNS is structured. AAPL.com and AAPL.org aren't just avoiding a collision - AAPL.org is utilizing the fact that it won't get sued on the .org namespace, while it would on the .com namespace. Sure you can make it so that two TLDs use the same ruleset and are on the same blockchain, but then the only thing that it accomplishes is to make an aesthetic difference between typing "yoursite-org / yoursite-com" and "yoursite.org / yoursite.com". One blockchain is one namespace, no matter how you slice it or mask it.

So the idea is, future DNS derivatives who want to have different rulesets for their namespace, or who want to prove me wrong and show how people are just willing to avoid collisions (would you register "yourname.dac" if "yourname.p2p" is registered and popular? maybe) can launch a DNS derivative a la BTS X.

So .key might have a ruleset that fits the supply/demand characteristic of having a namespace for public keys better than domainshares.

.intr could be the first namespace to support a full character set.

There might be another blockchain that handles migrating .com, .org, etc onto a blockchain.


Why .p2p?

Here were the good suggestion, IMO:
* .bts
* .dac
* .blk
* .we
* .p2p
* .key
* .dom

I don't want to do .bts or .dac because I find them slightly more awkward to say than .p2p, and I have a really strong aversion to people trying to sell me stuff (I know that's not what's happening, but I can't help but think .bts -> "BTS STANDS FOR BUY BITSHARES(tm)"). Furthermore I think .p2p does a much better job of marketing the advantages of a blockchain-based TLD than the others - people will instantly recognize what's up versus just thinking it's another TLD.

.key shouldn't be wasted on anything other than a namespace designed specifically for keys.

.we is risky because all two-letter TLDs are reserved by ICANN for country codes.

.blk is ok but worse than .p2p, fewer people know what a blockchain is

.dom is ok, maybe the first derivative with different namespace rules can grab it


50,000,000 shares:
It's just aesthetics. Open to alternatives.

.p2p sounds great and looks like a good TLD.
But the most thing I care about is that it is inconvinence for printing by keyborad.
You can have a try: .com, .net, .org, and try .p2p..... I feeling inconvinence and unhappy while typing .p2p in keyboard....