Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - xeroc

Pages: 1 ... 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 [826] 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 ... 860
12376
General Discussion / Re: Airdrop concerns with Lottoshares
« on: May 27, 2014, 01:35:20 pm »
Quote from: Stan on May 27, 2014, 01:25:29 pm
What should be this community's policy about endorsing third party DACs in general?
I'd say let them do but, ...
We feel responsible for investors and do the following:

* check genesis block and coin distribution after launch
* check source code (in order to prevent stealing of privkeys)
* check DAC model/profit

When all is fine we could announce a +ACK or a -NACK to investors.

12377
General Discussion / Re: [ThePad] Content-based Collaboration for our Community at Pad.BitShares.org
« on: May 27, 2014, 12:30:56 pm »
some updates


12378
General Discussion / Re: Delegated Proof of Stake (DPOS) White Paper
« on: May 27, 2014, 12:22:20 pm »
As the collection of quotes and descriptions rapidly growed I dedicated a own pad to the DPOS features

http://pad.bitshares.org/p/DPOS_FeatureList

12379
General Discussion / Re: MirrorChain--to solve the security threat during the new DACs distribution
« on: May 27, 2014, 10:50:24 am »
Maybe we can use some ellyptic curve magic to solve the issue ... much like what TITAN does?

12380
General Discussion / Re: Delegated Proof of Stake (DPOS) White Paper
« on: May 27, 2014, 09:16:02 am »
I am trying to compile a list of 'features' and quotes for DPOS
http://pad.bitshares.org/p/Upcoming_Newsletter_articles

http://pad.bitshares.org/p/DPOS_FeatureList

Goals is to be able to teach others what exactly DPOS is and how it compares to NXT, Ripple, satoshi-blockchain.

I'd probably need some help as I might haved mixed things up :-(

12381
General Discussion / Re: MirrorChain--to solve the security threat during the new DACs distribution
« on: May 27, 2014, 08:13:04 am »
Oh .. i am afraid my capabilities in reading and securing code are somewhat limited

12382
General Discussion / Re: MirrorChain--to solve the security threat during the new DACs distribution
« on: May 27, 2014, 07:40:01 am »
To me that sounds like a business opportunity, checking DAC sources :-)

12383
General Discussion / Re: New Public XTS Test for Developers and Savvy Users
« on: May 27, 2014, 06:45:41 am »
building from git-master-HEAD .. cannot connect to the network :-(

EDIT:
It says:
Code: [Select]
2976973ms       th_a           connect_to ] node_impl::connect_to(107.170.30.182:5678)                  node.cpp:2014
2976974ms       th_a           connect_to ] Exception binding outgoing connection to desired local endpoint: bind: Address already in use                       tcp_socket.cpp:104

Quote
32 3104875ms       th_a display_current_conn ] Currently have 1 of 8 connections   node.cpp:973
 33 3104875ms       th_a display_current_conn ]    my id is f31b6c18d1bebb3c616ba750be767efa214821a5   node.cpp:974
 34 3104875ms       th_a display_current_conn ]    handshaking: 107.170.30.182:5678 with 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000  [outbound]   node.cpp:982
 35 3104875ms       th_a p2p_network_connect_ ] Last attempt was 0 seconds ago (disposition: last_connection_failed)   node.cpp:639
 36 3104875ms       th_a display_current_conn ] Currently have 1 of 8 connections   node.cpp:973                                                                                                       
 37 3104875ms       th_a display_current_conn ]    my id is f31b6c18d1bebb3c616ba750be767efa214821a5   node.cpp:974
 38 3104875ms       th_a display_current_conn ]    handshaking: 107.170.30.182:5678 with 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000  [outbound]   node.cpp:982
 39 3104875ms       th_a p2p_network_connect_ ] Still want to connect to more nodes, but I don't have any good candidates.  Trying again in 15 seconds   node.cpp:667

12384
General Discussion / Re: MirrorChain--to solve the security threat during the new DACs distribution
« on: May 27, 2014, 06:43:32 am »
Quote from: gamey on May 27, 2014, 06:42:10 am
I don't think everyone would wish to release the source to their DACs.
Those probably wont make me to post my angelshare private key into. Not gonna happen!

12385
General Discussion / Re: BTT: Which PoS approach will win out?
« on: May 27, 2014, 06:37:32 am »
I have the feeling most btt users have outdated information about DPOS ..
Can we please collect all infos about DPOS for a newsletter article to educate them?

Anyway: I have the feeling the DPOS stands between NXT and ripple, technologically. Is that feeling correct?

12386
General Discussion / Re: MirrorChain--to solve the security threat during the new DACs distribution
« on: May 27, 2014, 06:27:42 am »
Quote from: Overthetop on May 27, 2014, 05:00:27 am
So, I suggest to setup one Mirrorchain by 3i offically to maintain the PTS,AGS etc data.
[...]
How about this ?
Decentralized!

You can always diff the official bitshares_toolkit against the new DAC and see for you self what changes they did. If you cannot read code, let others do the work for you!

We might need a trusted compile platform for the binaries

12387
General Discussion / Re: Gitshares: Gitchain based on Bitshares
« on: May 26, 2014, 04:08:28 pm »
Quote from: bytemaster on May 26, 2014, 02:55:54 pm
Quote from: toast on May 26, 2014, 02:50:25 pm
A BLOCKCHAIN FOR CATS??

Git is already decentralized, the only thing this does is *force* everyone to replicate it rather than have people choose which branch they want...

Git is, but github is not.   This is more like a way of decentralizing github. 

The problem I see is that there is no global resource that is being reallocated by a transaction ledger.  Git is already a blockchain if you think about the fact that every commit is a hash and references the prior commit by hash.
lol .. great!

12388
General Discussion / Re: Secure Payments to Users by Name
« on: May 26, 2014, 01:27:58 pm »
I wrote together a few lines of this thread:
http://pad.bitshares.org/p/Upcoming_Newsletter_articles

Please proof-read and add anything useful for possible readers of a newsletter.

12389
BitShares AGS / Re: Today .I made a too bad mistake
« on: May 26, 2014, 11:41:20 am »
Feel free to add anything for an article:
http://pad.xeroc.org/p/Upcoming_Newsletter_articles

12390
General Discussion / Re: [QCN] QuazarCoin | Privacy&Data protection | CPU only | Optimized miner
« on: May 26, 2014, 11:22:46 am »
Thanks for the overview of that coin ... however most people in here mainly dislike pow coins ..

Anyway ... i will read a little more about it

Pages: 1 ... 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 [826] 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 ... 860

Page created in 0.123 seconds with 24 queries.