I suppose you miss the fact that those 15% are supposed to go back to the reserve funds .. and that's what happend in the past already.
But hey, who reads worker proposals.

Holders,

Please remove the vote from NABTS worker since the worker/event is being cancelled due to lack of funding (depreciation of $BTS and voting issues in the past few weeks).

Despite team best efforts to collect private funds through co-sponsorship for making it happen, even with additional funds its impossible to acquire needed funds.

Cancellation of the event is having following costs:

- 10,000.00 USD towards EVOLV for the 2 months efforts and cancellation + 13% depreciation in LTC on half of it due to bear markets (we picked nice moment for cancellation).
- around 3,000.00 USD (still waiting final hours) for the worker team efforts and time they spent on worker.
- Fee for sold tickets through EventBrite and cancellation of the event (minor cost 67.70 USD + eventbrite refund policy + credit card processing fee)

Payment receipts, trading history and remaining of the funds (will be withdrawn and moved to zavod.premik account) will be presented after the holiday/weekend so the owner of the account healingvibes420 can have back ownership.

On behalf of Move Institute,

Milos (DL) Preocanin.

Chee®s

Too bad.

Our current model [developer -> wp -> poll -> developer] failed to deliver and

Could you explain by what metric this approach has failed?
There have been multiple hard forks, dozens of backend releases and countless releases on the frontend.
Additional DEXbot has brought tons of liquidity.
Please tell the community what makes you think your criticism is justified

the new model [investor -> vision -> mission -> wp -> polls -> developer -> marketing] is needed to gain transaction again.

I'd like to hear more about this.
When will investors come up with a vision? There have been 5 years now and I haven't seen any of them provide that.
How would you come from vision to mission in a decentralized ecosystem like ours. Who decides what should be part of the mission, or do you support multiple missions in parallel?

Getting on/off ramps for bitAssets is out of scope?

out of scope of this worker proposal, yes.

Please explain to me, the daily trading volume is 2M Yuan, and you complain about 16M being allocated over the next 6-12 months? Is that what you are saying?
Also, if you can find developers that can do high quality work for less than 100$/hr, please come forward with them. Surely none of our core developers would (and should) work for less (IMHO).
Quality has its price.

Also, BEOS has its own subforum, I suspect you can reach them there better.

1. welcome to bitsharestalk and the bitshares community
2. I recommend to never tell anyone who much crypto you have
3. Trezor does not support BitShares

You can trade your BTS against BTC IOUs (I owe you) from openledger, GDEX, or cryptobridge and withdraw them into real bitcoin from their.

This has to be discussed with Wirex, and the integration for this from their side is not complex.

You may have missed that the real thing here is the legal paper work for being compliant with credit card networks!
It surely not about the technicalities of integrating bitshares.

Also, if you can convince their lawyers that bitAssets are not securities, then that can be done right afterwards.