Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Pheonike

Pages: 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ... 65
466
Technical Support / Re: Collateral
« on: July 07, 2015, 07:21:46 pm »
When you sell your bitGOLD you will get 1 ounce of gold in the value of bitshares.

So lets say you bought bitGOLD for $1200 while bts was valued at $.024, this costs 50,000 bitshares.

Now you sell your bitGOLD for $1140 today while bts is valued at $.006 today, you receive 190,000 bitshares.

You just made a great trade and nearly quadrupled the amount of bitshares you had.

I see, so as long as the bitshares network remains viable i would always have bts available to cash out my position. Thank you for the clarification.

I must confess, I like your video KenCode. As someone who is not a trader I would like to understand the how to interpret these bitshares screens, but i love the idea of being able to save in different currencies and commodities.

I see people saying that there is no counter party risk, is that really true?

saying there's no counterparty risk may be too optimistic, it's just reduced with the collateral requirements. think worst case scenario where the entire BTS network takes a dive and the party short to your long forfeits collateral. sure, you get the collateral at the instantaneous liquidation price, but your ability to turn that BTS into whatever exit currency you want could be severely limited and you may be liquidating your own position at a big disadvantage. i guess that's pushing into the realm of systemic risk, but risk is risk...parsing by terminology could be misleading.

Since the blockchain is in control of the collateral, it's your counterparty risk meaning the entire system would have to fail for you to lose your funds. Unlike dealing with a 3rd party iou outside of you and the blockchain that could fail.

467
General Discussion / Re: Dan is doing the right thing .. again!
« on: July 03, 2015, 07:41:04 am »
You don't get it. You are worried about the crypto-community. We are building this for 99.999% of the population who don't know and may never know what crypto is. But they will still be able to enjoy the benefits of what crypto brings.

Exactly what I have been telling people.

yes.  +5% +5% +5% +5% +5%

... the gamers do not even have to understand cryptocurrencies, they are biz as usual but now using them and not even knowing.

People do not care about how a cell phone works, they just wanna snapchat dick pics. 

Likewise, explaining crypto to them is pointless, turn crypto into things they are familiar with and they will use it.

If  99.999% of the population won't understand or value decentralisation, doesn't that mean you're better off making a private centralised Cryptonomex blockchain which will be cheaper to run and which you and the developers have a much larger stake in?

Just because they don't understand why doesn't make it any less important to do it that way.  Alot of people don't understand the dangers of burning fossil fuels but that doesn't make renewable energy any less important to have.

468
General Discussion / Re: Dan is doing the right thing .. again!
« on: July 02, 2015, 08:45:26 pm »
You don't get it. You are worried about the crypto-community. We are building this for 99.999% of the population who don't know and may never know what crypto is. But they will still be able to enjoy the benefits of what crypto brings.

470

This sketch reminds of how Newmine is always trying to see something that isn't there  :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJnodkqJZ9s&list=PLrOFuU2nlQyWtcBIh7l10rVIN_YXlP2cq&index=4

471
Nanocard / Re: Support NanoCard funding your dreams! on HeadTalker!
« on: July 01, 2015, 06:08:14 pm »

I got mine too. Just waiting to activate it on CCEDK.

472

This is cool. Makes you wonder "Why didn't I think of that?"

http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/24/v3solar-spin-cell-cones-cheap-solar/

473
So if someone steals from you tough luck. Get better locks.

474

It brings more traffic to our network which means more transactions. It also demonstrates how businesses can integrate with our system.

475
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Rename to Muse
« on: June 25, 2015, 06:09:46 pm »
Here you go then

The "MELODIC" blockchain.

476

Smells like newmine/de feeding fud.

477
You are going to have your public blockchains for transactions with governments and employers/business. Then your private blockchains for your cash/anonymous transactions. The problem/trick will be acquiring funds to use on your private chains that don't have any association with the public chains.

478
Meta / Re: A Centralized Place to Discuss 2.0 "Policies & Procedures"
« on: June 24, 2015, 05:02:00 pm »

There will need to be a Roberts Rule of Order document that defines these with a dedicated page on the website.

http://www.robertsrules.org/

479

Just noticed the link in article for decentralized exchange points to banx.io instead of bitshares.org

480
General Discussion / Re: BitShares on Service Annoucements at BTT
« on: June 23, 2015, 11:02:50 pm »

The top exchanges are not thinking of changing their system over to ours. They would alienate their core users. We need to focus of the small and medium ones who have something to gain in the short term. By the time large exchange realize what's happening they will be obsolete anyway.

Pages: 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ... 65