The Bitshares Business platform contains the following features,

 Hetero-CurrencyOS engine
 Value-Protection VM
 Trade-Engine with stock market drivers included
 Dynamically delegated Resource management module
 Error Checking and Correction (ECC) expenses management subsystem
 Plugin Architecture for future expansion.

When will PLAY get to this point?

http://cointelegraph.com/news/114443/voxelnauts-a-minecraft-inspired-game-with-nxt-backed-property-rights-and-drm

Quote from: DataSecurityNode on May 28, 2015, 03:18:19 pm

Quote from: kokojie on May 28, 2015, 02:58:48 pm

Why are you running 6 delegates. A lot of voters would be turned off by such large number of delegates run by the same person from the same location.

Low market cap, low transactions, low liquidity, and low user adoption are even bigger turn offs I think.

Our Delegate bid hits on raising all that among other things. You are welcome to explore the why at http://vote.bunkermining.com that is stated at the very beginning.

The need for 6 is was only driven by community support and the ow market cap reality of bitshares for what is required of this operation.

Voting for our delegates means a vote for higher market cap and raising BitShares standing in the crypto space overall.

I also think having delegates elected that don't even have servers operational is far worse, which was what this thread is about.

If the idea that someone operating 6 delegates who is building up bitshares and maintaining responsible delegate infrastructure for the network in contrast to that is somehow a turn-off in contrast to having delegates in the 101 that dont' even exist, then I can't argue that.

Keep in mind we already have someone (btsnow) with 4 delegates for a long time now, and Bitshares has survived.

Moonstone has had designs to get 5 Delegates elected as part of their crowdfund.

Our bid is quite different though.. everything we do flows back to BitShares and creates a buy/sell market pressure that is consistent day to day. We need to expand.. now.

Not sure how having Bitshares eco-system buying PoW waste is beneficial to Bitshares, I thought the whole idea of PoS is to avoid such waste. The entire idea of "minebitshares.com" is ridiculous to me.

Six 100% delegate controlled by one person from one location, if elected, would be an example of failure of DPoS. In this case, yes two non-operational delegates would be preferable to six 100% delegates controlled by the same person. Especially this person is spending the money on buying PoW waste.

Please read what a proposal/projects does before attacking it.

I just want to thank the starter of this thread for dumping and leaving so could buy a couple of BTC worth BTS for cheap just before this rise.

Circle is also another choice for purchasing Bitcoin.

https://www.circle.com

Quote from: Thom on May 26, 2015, 04:48:48 pm

So you want to destroy the dev staff?

What you propose does not make sense. Wait until DPoS 2.0 and THEN decide. It's only a few short days ahead.

No , I just want dev staff can gain more usd by 100% pay delegate

AS great as the Dev staff is, they can't do it all alone. There is a need for other projects to be funded in parallel to add to BitShares System. They more you add to their plate, the longer it will take. Let them focus on the core things that need to be done and let community assist in the others features that are necessary too.

I think we are saying the average users are not going to be using bitusd for their transactions. They are going to use GatewayUSD because that is where they are most likely be converting from FiatUSD in the first place. Most users will not be coming in through BTS or BTC. Therefore it is more important for GatewayUSD to hold the peg to FiatUSD. So BitUSD is going to be traded mostly between Gateways who can use the premium to keep their GatewayUSD pegged FiatUSD.