Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - godzirra

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6
46
General Discussion / Re: My TEDx Bermuda Presentation on Cryptocurrencies
« on: December 11, 2014, 06:20:23 pm »
Quote
Great job, I hope we will see bitshares on TED soon
.

If bitshares marketing contacted me, then I'd be happy to mention them on TED or any of the other venues I speak at.

Sweet. Let's make this happen.

47
General Discussion / Re: Escrow Passes Basic Testing
« on: November 25, 2014, 12:43:24 am »
Appreciate all the hard work!

48
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: First PeerTracks gathering
« on: November 24, 2014, 06:50:48 am »
I'm really looking forward to what you guys come up with. Such an amazing opportunity.
 +5%

49
May the best consensus algorithm win!

50
Wondering if the text would stand out more if the background photos were blurred slightly.

just a thought. Great job guys.

51
DAC PLAY / Re: Polling closed early?
« on: November 20, 2014, 04:02:13 am »
Why does the poll say November 29?

52
DAC PLAY / Polling closed early?
« on: November 20, 2014, 02:33:06 am »
The fairness poll seems to have been ended or locked early.
Any word on why?

53
DAC PLAY / Re: Do you find the BitShares PLAY allocation just?
« on: November 18, 2014, 06:19:46 pm »
Trying to have a reasonable conversation with you is exhausting.

54
DAC PLAY / Re: Do you find the BitShares PLAY allocation just?
« on: November 18, 2014, 07:16:37 am »

Quote
I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to please everybody. ~Bill Cosby

Interesting timing w the Bill Cosby quote


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Maybe. Also not raping women.

lol....jesus.  I have shit I'm actually trying to get done...buzzing on some coffee to stay awake and you made me spit it out with that little jest. 



Why not just fork PLAY, and give the allocation as you like, that's better.

-5 %
Sent from my ALCATEL ONE TOUCH 997D

I am actually a little bit concerned here....

Hack is only "expected" to honor PTS/AGS 10% and 10%.  Instead of seeing a bunch of people who are thrilled to get over that, I see people giving him hell. 

Under the old social consensus, 10% to PTS and 10% to AGS could be met and the Dev would be able to keep the rest for himself...not that he did this mind you.  But the PTS and AGS holders who would get this sharedrop would likely sell their shares right out of the door because of the bad distribution.  However...I do not see a bad distribution here. 

Please explain why it is so bad.  Oh...and mind you, I donated most of my AGS funds after the feb 28 snapshot so I am kind of getting screwed too if I am thinking about "fairness". 

I think Hack is right.  Fork it!  Sharedrop in the way that suits you!  Or hire someone to fork it and do the sharedrop!


P.S.  this is not being stated because hack is giving us funds to start our own tournament...
I still have yet the hear any logical reason why BTS should be share dropped 3x more than AGS. AGS people are being labeled as greedy and divisive and harassing. Honestly it's those who want 3x more than AGS who are to blame for this ridiculous situation. BTS holders should just let Hackfisher correct his mistake. Imo BTS holders who want 3x are being extremely selfish in voting yes to the poll.

55
DAC PLAY / Re: Do you find the BitShares PLAY allocation just?
« on: November 18, 2014, 04:06:25 am »

Quote
I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to please everybody. ~Bill Cosby

Interesting timing w the Bill Cosby quote


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Maybe. Also not raping women.

56
DAC PLAY / Re: Do you find the BitShares PLAY allocation just?
« on: November 16, 2014, 10:10:11 pm »
Regardless of the whether the allocation changes or not, this issue has been divisive. Delulo, godzirra - you realise you are arguing over a 55% stake, while BM mentioned there is no need for the remaining 45% stake to be allotted elsewhere?

Instead of the infighting, unite and request Hackfisher for the following distribution - 50% non-vested BTS, 50% AGS+PTS, and paid delegates through dilution (basically asking for 15% extra for each group - no need to take away from one to give to another).

I've said what I wanted to say. This whole process pretty much tells me what I need to know.
Also could we get this posted in the General Discussion area. Just so the whole community can see it. It will be more representative.

57
DAC PLAY / Re: Do you find the BitShares PLAY allocation just?
« on: November 16, 2014, 09:08:22 pm »
@luckybit

Well it would seem that it is your decision as Hackfisher has left it to a community vote. So I would assume you have voted No since you deem it unjust?

In all reality I will personally receive PLAY no matter what as I hold BTS PTS and AGS. But the lack of common sense in such clear matter makes me realize I don't think it will do that well anyways. I'd be happy to be wrong. Good luck with PLAY. At this point I have very little interest in it at all.

58
DAC PLAY / Re: Do you find the BitShares PLAY allocation just?
« on: November 16, 2014, 06:11:52 pm »
This community has always been able to pivot and adapt to what is right. It's frustrating at times as well but that willingness to admit that the course needed to be altered is something I think is a strength not a weakness. I don't actually care about the allocation (as I have all types of Bitshares products) so much as I do that PLAY and Hackfisher seem unable or unwilling to admit a mistake and just correct it. This is troubling to me. I do not see this ending well.
I admit my mistake on that I didn't know that AGS(as a social contract) is no longer being merged to BTS any more, but I also want to admit there were mess on the forum that ideas can not clearly spread out here.

So I want this decision be carefully made, so people out here, QQ groups, Exchanges btc38 discussion, and others can also know this changes.

You want this decision to be carefully made? Give me one reason why the PLAY allocation is so completely different than MUSIC? There is very little in this decision that bears any resemblance to careful. It's totally arbitrary.

59
DAC PLAY / Re: Do you find the BitShares PLAY allocation just?
« on: November 16, 2014, 04:45:47 pm »
This community has always been able to pivot and adapt to what is right. It's frustrating at times as well but that willingness to admit that the course needed to be altered is something I think is a strength not a weakness. I don't actually care about the allocation (as I have all types of Bitshares products) so much as I do that PLAY and Hackfisher seem unable or unwilling to admit a mistake and just correct it. This is troubling to me. I do not see this ending well.

60
DAC PLAY / Re: Do you find the BitShares PLAY allocation just?
« on: November 16, 2014, 04:34:36 pm »
AGS got more than 10%
PTS got more than 10%
BTS got something like 35%

It's a fair allocation imo.

Would I find fair an allocation of 20-20-15% ? yeah that would be a fair allocation too but the point is that now we have an official allocation and you are asking to change it for no good reason imo.

I also find it hard for someone that invested after 28th of February to be all in PTS/AGS and to not have any bts, in any case you got more than the minimum 10% so there is no reason to complain for anything.

I could say that current allocation "punishes" all bts dumpers and this is something I like!


I hold double the amount of bts than I had from 28th February snapshot and also I have 6x more PTS/AGS now than then(80% is AGS) I dont know which allocation will profit me more but I know that If I had sold-dumped the majority of my bts I would be really pissed off with current allocation.

I never dumped any Btsx. You think there's no good reason? How about Hackfisher misunderstanding the social contract? There was no merger of AGS!!!

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6