yunbi just vote all the refund/burn workers , the purpose is to raise the threshold to be workers.
the game rule is there, if you want to make money as a worker, you need to face the possibility to be voted out. surely you can try to convince the stake holders that your job is useful and effective. and then maybe you can be voted in.
Talented developers won't be trying too hard to convince anyone, they'll just go get a job being paid more. lol.
So you're saying this is a dilution system designed for developers to propose their ideas and easily get paid by voting of a bunch of developers who hasn't been showing how to build product that can earn effective profit ?
If that's the case , bitshares is easy to an attack .
One can just need to ask some programmers who have a lot of free time to come here and propose some fancy function (with the clear idea it won't generate revenue for the system , but sounded cool .) , and they can effectively drain every last bit of money from BitShares eco-system and left BTS with some code that can be easily moved and copied to their own project or community .
IF the idea of a low threshold is to attract developer to work ( not hiring developers with clear business plan or vetting if their project is needed/benefit/profitable for the system , but just let them to do coding that could impressed the heck out of existing developers or community members who happens to be easily impressed by almost everything and gives a ) .......
And you know what the worse part could be ?
Every project could see BTS as a experimental grant and get funding for their projects easily to code without taking risk themselves , and then move the work product to their own project ...
So BTS and their product both have a new feature , but BTS eco-system was drained out of more value .....
Attracting developers should not be the goal . Attracting developers to finish things that matters is the gold . It shouldn't be decided by developers . Even if you go out to work for companies , you don't get to decide what you do or how much you ask for it , in the end the employers decides everything with regard to their own reality or business aspects .
Developers code for a living , their enjoy working and getting paid , the more work they do the more paid they can get , they don't have regard if their work is profitable or not . Their interest and the business is not aligned in this instance even though they claim getting pay more will align their interest with the business.
Imaging this happens to a company , developers could propose some tasks that involves some serious budget that the company could not afford and the company account will be forced to paid them because they controls the bank accounts now.... And what you should be worry about more ? No one works for you 
Or fix this potential issue considering the financial situation that the firm is facing ?
You don't give the control of the bank accounts to the workers , no matter how badly you want them to work . Hell ... If I have that kind of juicy power in my company , I can not promise I can control myself not to do all kinds of stuff that I'm not sure would worth it just to get some overtime payment .
You are trying really hard to make a point that isn't there. The current place I do consulting for, I gave them my rate and they agreed to it. It wasn't an offer from them for me to work for them. They ask if I am available. The difference is they understand my value. Developers are not like factory workers. A lot of guys with MBAs etc would like to think so, but that is not the case.
The fact is most people simply don't have the intelligence/IQ to do high level development work. The guy putting out wordpress sites isn't the same guy writing a p2p application in C++.
If you can't pay market rate, then you either need to get lucky hiring someone or figure out a way to entice a a developer into working for you. This is where BTS currently is. Finding guys who are familar with the codebase and don't waste a lot of time getting up to speed is another problem. Goodluck there.
Everyone is completely correct to oversee any and all work done via proposals. That is not what is going on here. That is your confusing of issues to try and be correct. What is going on here is mindless voting against all paid development. Granted, you can say they are only voting to "raise the threshold".. but that is just more stupid nonsense although technically correct.
While I like the idea of a blockchain supporting itself, it has become exactly what I thought. Too many bosses for too few workers. What a fucking nightmare.
Keep inventing strawmen arguments though to keep up your irrationality.
Really, this has nothing to do with developers "controlling the bank account".. And in a lot of companies that aren't very large, the developers do just as many business decisions as the rest of the company. The last job I had where I had to show up in an office I ended up editing legal contracts because their in house attorney was a moron. You just make up some random difference between developers and the rest of the company to try and make your case. Nonsense.
I don't even want to get started about this being an "attack vector" for BTS. Give us a break. You are just completely inventing problems that have not occurred to excuse away this irrationality that will just screw BTS.
I used to think Chinese were great for BTS. It was somehow an advantage to have their support. I now really question that as I have yet to see any of them understand the basics of functioning companies or what is required.
Reading the above post, if you were not Chinese, I'd think you'd just smoked way too much weed tonight... Although I guess maybe it is the drink.
Who knows.
Good grief.
Show Posts
