Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - gamey

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 151
16
MichaelX on steemit has been a prolific contributor since he discovered it recently.  A quick scan of his posts show his awesome levels of competence.

He is the single most important business developer in the world to the near term future of BitShares.

I've been always wondering why Bitshares hasn't managed to attract more great blockchain devs. If Murderistic/MichaelX has been running the show behind the scenes, that might explain something. As everybody can see from his posts in this topic, he is not very nice person. I'd run away and fast if I had to work with him. He is clearly very angry, bitter and can't tolerate any criticism. It sucks quite much to work with people like him.

It was horrifying to read Stan's approval for this person. I'm pretty sure Bitshares will have quite a lot difficulties attracting competent devs or investors as long as Michael and Mark Lyford are associated to it in any way.

Seriously Stan... Nobody cares your personal views about Michael or Mark. What's most important for Bitshares (and Steem) is that any kind of associations with well known scammers are avoided at any cost. Mark has already ruined his reputation in the eyes of public and now Michael is trying very hard to ruin his own reputation too. When you are applauding these guys, you are causing serious harm for the reputation of Bitshares (and Steem).

I ran into this guy at the BItcoin thing in Vegas that several of us went to. I cant remember what we were chatting about to bring this up, but he was quick to talk about how he sold what I recall to be ~ $1 million worth of BTC at the peak.  It is a strange thing for someone with money to go around talking about amounts to random people like that so I wrote him off as a likely fraud. I always wondered if Murderistic was this same person.  Murderistic came around asking for $$ for some press release pass thing, but then refused to give out his identity. It was strange..

These are all from my memories and I may very well be wrong.

memories are indeed wrong.

I came around with a delegate proposal for a paid traffic campaign with banners and PPC traffic.  People didn't like it.  No press pass thing @gamey

As for calling me a scammer because I talked about the fact I bought bitcoin at $30 and sold at 997 = well I guess that is your opinion.

Not everyone there was random, I knew Brian and Stan and Dan and Gregory and several others for quite some time.  Maybe your recollection is fuzzier than you think.

No, the discussion was when we were walking away from the lunch get together  There was no Brian/Stan/Dan/Gregory in this discussion. I've known people with millions, some from family some self-made and I've never seen them openly talk about amounts to people they barely know. Mentioning your entry/exit point is one thing, but conveying how much you had is a different thing entirely. One is small talk and one is to demonstrate something. (for whatever reason)

17
MichaelX on steemit has been a prolific contributor since he discovered it recently.  A quick scan of his posts show his awesome levels of competence.

He is the single most important business developer in the world to the near term future of BitShares.

I've been always wondering why Bitshares hasn't managed to attract more great blockchain devs. If Murderistic/MichaelX has been running the show behind the scenes, that might explain something. As everybody can see from his posts in this topic, he is not very nice person. I'd run away and fast if I had to work with him. He is clearly very angry, bitter and can't tolerate any criticism. It sucks quite much to work with people like him.

It was horrifying to read Stan's approval for this person. I'm pretty sure Bitshares will have quite a lot difficulties attracting competent devs or investors as long as Michael and Mark Lyford are associated to it in any way.

Seriously Stan... Nobody cares your personal views about Michael or Mark. What's most important for Bitshares (and Steem) is that any kind of associations with well known scammers are avoided at any cost. Mark has already ruined his reputation in the eyes of public and now Michael is trying very hard to ruin his own reputation too. When you are applauding these guys, you are causing serious harm for the reputation of Bitshares (and Steem).

I ran into this guy at the BItcoin thing in Vegas that several of us went to. I cant remember what we were chatting about to bring this up, but he was quick to talk about how he sold what I recall to be ~ $1 million worth of BTC at the peak.  It is a strange thing for someone with money to go around talking about amounts to random people like that so I wrote him off as a likely fraud. I always wondered if Murderistic was this same person.  Murderistic came around asking for $$ for some press release pass thing, but then refused to give out his identity. It was strange..

These are all from my memories and I may very well be wrong.

18
General Discussion / Re: Lost Account = No Backup
« on: July 26, 2016, 03:39:16 pm »
Choice of "backup" is a poor decision on Bitshares design.  Backup semantically implies an optional step.  It should be like "Save your shit so you don't lose it".  Sure that'd be the opposite of professional but probably preferable.

19
General Discussion / Re: Bitcoin greatest vulnerability
« on: July 13, 2016, 08:39:35 pm »

I wasted a lot of my time reading through half of it, just because of the way it is cloaked in intrigue.  The guy had some big project then realizes the concept of hash collisions and somehow thinks all the cryptographers in the BTC space are not aware..  honestly,  this is beyond insanity. If this was a problem, then we'd be seeing it, but we don't.  Yet somehow it stopped the guy from proceeding with his project? 

20
Technical Support / Re: Uploading a screen shot?
« on: July 12, 2016, 11:16:27 pm »

It would likely be easier to upload it to something like imgur or a dozen other image hosting sites then reference that site in your post.

21
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Community sentiment - cob screwed us?
« on: June 15, 2016, 06:18:04 pm »
I'd hate to bring water to the mill but I'd like to respond to concerns.

This isn't or wasn't a scam. We aren't anonymous guys. Funds were spent where they appeared required.
And we were INVITED to "those fancy events" they didn't incur huge expenses. I almost regret sharing the pictures the events, but I don't (:
The project got industry attention. Delivery is what is missing.  Luckily Troopeers has started being demo'd. We'll soon have the metrics (users, income, eyeballs) required to move onto the next phase.

Ben is correct I'm not at the helm,  I initiated the project and a week later, Daniel introduced me to Eddie, PeerTracks CEO... possibly reptilian.

what is reptilian

It means 'like a reptile'. This is a reference to some insanity based conspiracy theory where some lizard people control the world or some such..  I don't know the origins. Some fiction somewhere.

Look 2 posts above the quoted post, that is what Cob was responding to.

22
General Discussion / Re: At least BTS outlasted NuShares
« on: June 10, 2016, 11:29:40 pm »
Does this even count as a victory for BitShares? Given its current state

Crypto thinks its competing against itself, and it may very well be..

However, if you look outside of the box, we're not even making a tiny dent in the real fiat market, and that's all crypto technologies combined.

So, a victory?  I don't think so. No more than if BitUSD fell, it wouldn't be a victory for Nubits either.

Nubits is one of those projects that hacked together a lot of things and was not a pure trustless blockchain solution.  We warned people repeatedly back when they came out. It is a victory but not really in a competition that exists.

23
General Discussion / Re: At least BTS outlasted NuShares
« on: June 09, 2016, 02:16:32 pm »

So let me get this right...  They sold their collateral to take dividends ?

Anyone have any links to the grand thread that explains this stuff?

24
General Discussion / Re: At least BTS outlasted NuShares
« on: June 09, 2016, 03:40:25 am »

CMC has it at $.95 .. is that broken?  Has it been much worse previously?

25
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Early 2nd quarter 2016 update
« on: June 06, 2016, 10:04:08 pm »

If he hasn't just left and went silent he's actually better than all your scammers. If you think he is teasing you just sit on your tokens. There has to be some reason he sticks around.

26

 His passion will probably serve him better in other pursuits. He was quite interesting and his approach was refreshing. Hope you're doing well out there, Martin!

27
20k is wishful thinking and probably not enough due diligence on onceuponatime's side.

the more votes are cast the less shares a post has in the end. the end is 4th of july when everything is paid out.

it's highly likely that we talk about 2-3 figure per whale voted post.

advertising a high payrate will horribly backfire

What is your understanding of how a 'whale voted' post works?  Are you under the belief that it doesn't affect visibility but does affect payment?

That is my general view 'horrible backfiring' and a lot of that will fall on BitShares. :(

28

I am working on the Website and currently thinking about the right design structure plus a way how to fund the front end developer. I first want to be 100% sure to get a voter in, because i don´t want to waste 160€ for a empty worker. I do not have spear funds fur such a deal. So before we think about a big rebranding, let us use what we have so far. Refaine our core values and talk to our core target group.


You should have posted this to STEEM.

And for the morons who think that the Steemit posters will lose value of their bitUSD (STEEM backed crypto dollars are the same thing) relative to USD as they go to cash it out on July 5th,  I have to laugh and realize that not even some of the BitShares faithful know that the concept of:

"the  value of 1 bitUSD can always be sold for $1 USD" is true

But for these people who are afraid that the value of bitUSD will fall relative to USD I will do you the favor and do your homework for you:

On July 5th the value of STEEMPOWER will fall as the STEEM backed dollars are pulled out of the system.  Sorry but the concept of smartcoins has been around now for years and when you act like it does not exist, it kind of makes me feel like a genius and realize that if the BitShares locals still have not learned what the heck a "smartcoin" is then...... (do the math)(early adopt much?)

How is the value of the bitUSD (SBD) going to hold it's value during this predictable exodous?  By barring the doors of the STEEMPOWER holders (and taking their money and giving it to the curators). 

Duh.. "smartcoins"  hello.  STEEM is a simplified fork of BitShares not a more complex one (no shorting/margin calls etc).  Wake up class, life is passing you by.

ELI5:

STEEM - It's just a BitShares fundraiser

As far as branding goes.  Let's keep the "BitShares" brand of smartcoins, but since our DEX is so kick ass performancewise, I do believe that we should start calling it:

"The DEX"

It is after all the first and only place that I know of where you can create and trade smartcoins (those things that many around here still fail to admit the existance of!)

Where is the best discussion of how the STEEMIT dollars work without the long/short mechanism?

The Steem Dollar is an amalgamation of stable coin mechanisms, largely influenced by Vitalik Buterin's seignorage shares and other seignorage based stable coins, as well as lessons learned from BitUSD, Nubits and Dai. Other than seignorage, the token is supported by automatic distribution at a set rate, the holder's ability to use the blockchain to convert to Steem, price feeds and a target % of market cap. The blockchain has self-balancing seignorage mechanisms to make sure SD stays at a target % of market capitalization. To improve price feeds and liquidity, trading occurs off-chain or on-chain, however, one of the important facilitators of SD is the subsidized blockchain-based market between Steem and Steem Dollars.

Although I appreciate your effort, this doesn't explain much. Seignorage and that marketcap do not instill confidence.  This post comes across as something analagous to FUD, but would be like 'Trust, Certainty, and Understanding'.  TCU. (Taking care of uncertaintly) 

No real details where I could look at it and convince myself that these 20k claimed SD cashouts are trustworthy claims.

29
Technical Support / Re: Bitshares and OpenLedger
« on: June 04, 2016, 05:58:24 pm »
From my worker thread:
I agree with Xeroc though that it would be great to have a video making clear the distinction between Bitshares and Openledger. And if it's paid by worker it would be best if the videos used either the light wallet or bitshares.org/wallet.

I've been commissioned to produce Bitshares-branded videos, which I think is the right choice. I'd like to be able to navigate to http://bitshares.org and click the Online Wallet button, demonstrating the link to the Bitshares wallet. It's clear that OpenLedger is a for-profit company, and it doesn't seem like a decentralized blockchain's website should be linking to the OL wallet as if they are the same brand.

Any thoughts?

Thats the least of our concerns.  If Ronny continues to show himself to be a dependable business partner and admin/upkeep a centralized frontend then BitShares should support him. He is one of the best things BitShares has going for it.

What is the alternative that should be linked to?

30
Technical Support / Re: Open Ledger won't let me trade
« on: June 04, 2016, 05:33:42 pm »

The market told me my fee was .14 BTS and I have a balance of 90.I guess I'll sell some of my OPEN.BTC and acquire more BTS under the assumption that the .14 fee is wrong.
No, that sounds like the right fee, and 90 BTS is plenty to do a lot of trading. What account are you using? I looked at "gamey", but it has no BTS...

Thank you for your effort looking into this. I was about to give you my account but it is humorously and harmlessly obscene, so I went to cryptofresh first.

Apparently my balance is 0 BTS. I had 90 BTS and the last order used those up. I am fairly positive at the time I looked at my balance and saw 90 BTS.  I spent some time looking at the exchange, so I would be very surprised if I misremembered that.  My belief now is that there was some sort of data synch issue, where the local javascript had the wrong balance. After reloading the site today it has 0 BTS balance like expected.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 151