Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - carpet ride

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 37
31
General Discussion / [ANN]Now Open: ShareBits CrowdDonations
« on: November 15, 2015, 03:37:15 pm »
Just checking that I see how this works.  If I share an asset with a random girl on Twitter, then she clicks my link, claims the asset and passively joins my referral network.  The ShareBot also takes .1bts which it adds to the cost of transfer.  Is this correct?

33
General Discussion / Re: Then, let's talk about Increasing Fees
« on: November 14, 2015, 01:59:17 pm »

Whatever it will be,  the most important thing is to be a simple stupid one for consumers,  not an  all in one giant trash.
As for me,  the client performance of bts2.0 is good for me,  but it is really hard to use comparing with other exchanges,  like poloniex,  bitoex,  cryptosy etc.



Here's an excerpt from someone (I won't name them, but they're HUGE and hope they don't mind me posting this) that I respect in the cryptocurrency ecosystem ...

Quote
It's amazing how the most competitive, centralized space is the one that he [Dan] still is choosing to go after when the solutions offered by bitshares in any other market are revolutionary and not in need of improvement besides a real UI design.

The reasoning is thoughtful though.  Becoming marginally successful in the exchange space prevents us from going into other markets with bottlenecks around liquidity and tight pegs, which are necessary in these other markets, such as payments.  What markets did this person have in mind that would allow us to bypass these bottlenecks?

34
Smart contract or trust based loan?

35
General Discussion / Re: BitShares/Graphene sales pitch
« on: November 12, 2015, 08:34:43 pm »

My point boils down to this: currently we have a very nice balance between our offering for online merchants and our offering for online consumers.
Online merchants have their reasons to try us out and online consumers have their own reasons to be attracted.

So please let us not damage this. Let us not to try to "improve" the pricing policy based on our personal feelings and experiences like "talking to a guy on a plane".
Even if our pricing policy is non-standard. Let us have the guts to be different in this respect and see how it plays out.

At least not until we have a clear indication from the sales people that things need to be changed.

And one more thing: we are aiming for mass adoption but if we achieve just 3% of the online payments market - it will be a tremendous success. Even 1% will make us huge. So we are not aiming to satisfy everybody. We just need to clearly define our customers and it's never gonna be 100% of the population.

Which features do you like about the current and proposed pricing policies?

36
General Discussion / Re: BitShares/Graphene sales pitch
« on: November 12, 2015, 07:54:41 pm »
Looks good. What will your company do?

37
General Discussion / Re: BitShares TL;DR. Explain in one line
« on: November 12, 2015, 04:51:12 pm »
BTS- The World's First Peer to Peer Financial Exchange

38
General Discussion / Re: Ldger - Marketplace Lending Is Exploding
« on: November 12, 2015, 01:33:39 pm »

it's because BitShares is too hard to understand and too difficult to follow.

I agree it's too hard to understand.  Hopefully we'll soon just see Graphene based apps that seem no different from the mainstream exchange and payments apps. I'll be surprised if upcoming apps even have voting and asset issuance at the surface. App creators will get command of voting, in the same way bitsapphire was going to with moonstone.

39
General Discussion / Re: BitShares TL;DR. Explain in one line
« on: November 11, 2015, 11:44:09 pm »
Bitshares is a magniexchange.

Bitshares is a populexchange.

Bitshares is a congloexchange.

Bitshares is a myriexchange.

Yes I made those words up. But my feeling is Graphene exchanges demand a new word.  They're completely unprecedented as a noun.

40
General Discussion / Re: Ldger - Marketplace Lending Is Exploding
« on: November 11, 2015, 11:06:49 pm »
The hard part I have with not being considered for projects like this is not knowing whether BitShares has a brand or an incompleteness problem.

41

I think bitshares.org should target 3 categories of visitiors:

1. Cryptocurrency traders looking to eliminate counterparty risk
2. Libertarians that got fond of DAC idea that might be interested in investing into BTS and try to participate in BitShares self-governance
3. Developers looking to utilize all benefits of BitShares as a platform

The page should have clear call to action for each category with accent on #1 - it looks like BitShares as exchange can get some traction first, but we shouldn't ignore other categories.

I would suggest to have a big background picture with trading interface to make it to appeal to category #1 and have clear call to action for all 3 categories, it can be something like this:
- Don't trust centralized exchanges? Try first full featured decentralized exchange and eliminate counterparty risk.
- Looking to be a shareholder of first decentralized autonomous company? By shares and help the community to govern it. Get rich as price of your shares rise.
- Looking ideal high performance platform for smart contracts? Get started right now.
+5^

42
new post on https://certainassets.com ... can I get a retweet?!    :)

edit: it has pictures too




43
General Discussion / Re: Mentioned on TechCrunch
« on: November 09, 2015, 05:49:07 pm »
Thanks guys, looks like it came through.

44
General Discussion / Mentioned on TechCrunch
« on: November 09, 2015, 04:52:46 pm »
http://techcrunch.com/2015/10/31/liquid-bitcoin/

A big but subtle mention of Bitshares on Techcrunch.

#btstip carpet ride 100 BROWNIE.PTS
(testing & nice find) :D

Thanks!  What should I do to claim?

45

Reduce the transfer fee if you must, but do not reduce it to 0, you kill the the merchants, the normal users and the wallet providers with that. There must be incentive to use the referral program for transfers for a functioning eco-system.

Merchants may be able to choose their fee structure regardless of the blockchain fee.  They have 30c plus 3% to play with.  The question may be do merchants really need the referral program or will they be happy enough being able to play with the additional margin.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 37