46
Technical Support / Re: Verifying a Brain Key
« on: November 09, 2015, 03:17:22 am »which browser u are using?
Safari .. It seems it's not opening or trying to save the .bin file very well. .. any ideas?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
which browser u are using?
The flaw in the approach is the off-chain agreement.
You are basically asking for a lifetime of administration over your account for this one refer. Even if it maybe big,
I understand you want the bird-dog, so what I would propose to do for you since this is something sizeable would be to give you your own faucet that runs outside our wallet. Essentially a sub-faucet that then directs to the wallet. Would be pretty much indistinguishable from the original, the URL would just be different.
That would probably be the easiest way to get it done for you for what you are describing.
Nice work.
Can you list in the profile page, i.e. http://cryptofresh.com/u/fav the referred accounts, "openledger-reg created account albertus79 thanks to fav"?
This is definitely possible... it's on my list
In the meantime, I've added two new charts to the homepage:
Top Proxies
Top Referrers
http://cryptofresh.com/
These numbers will be updated daily or so.
This is badass work, roadscape.
Also, Fav at 42... Is that just since the program went live?
since dacplays wallet went live.
Nice work.
Can you list in the profile page, i.e. http://cryptofresh.com/u/fav the referred accounts, "openledger-reg created account albertus79 thanks to fav"?
This is definitely possible... it's on my list
In the meantime, I've added two new charts to the homepage:
Top Proxies
Top Referrers
http://cryptofresh.com/
These numbers will be updated daily or so.
I've made an effort and now I can say I fully understand BM's concept of SQP but still I cannot see a major flaw in it.
OK attempt #4
If you understand BM's design you must already know that it requires certain market participants [namely short position holders] to buy assets at price 150% [in the original design] above the market price [i.e. feed price].
If you find nothing wrong with this, I really do not think any argument in any language [even perfect English] will make you change your mind.