Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - carpet ride

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 37
46
Technical Support / Re: Verifying a Brain Key
« on: November 09, 2015, 03:17:22 am »
which browser u are using?

Safari .. It seems it's not opening or trying to save the .bin file very well. .. any ideas?

47
Technical Support / Re: Downloading a Wallet Backup
« on: November 09, 2015, 12:20:36 am »
Actually forget the brain key... The brain key did not work because there were imported accounts. However, the Wallet Export also does not seem to work for me, which leads me to my next question ...

New Question:

When I download a wallet backup, my browser opens up an *empty* tab .... what is this for and where can I find my backup file?

Thanks!

48
Freebie / Re: Project BtsTip [freebie]
« on: November 08, 2015, 11:14:01 pm »
Great project!  Is it possible to send someone a tip that must be claimed in a given period of time, and then if it's unclaimed in the given period, it would go back to the tipper?

49
Technical Support / Verifying a Brain Key
« on: November 08, 2015, 11:00:42 pm »
How is brain key successfully verified?  I am copying and pasting the brain key shown in the prior screen into the verification box, but it is still not working

Also what is this part of the brain key that reads:  "7__5  * Check Digits"   ... ?

Thanks!

51
Could you explain in more detail how Cryptonomex and its exchange partners can setup sub faucets to grow a sales force?

52
General Discussion / Re: Best Exchange Website
« on: November 05, 2015, 06:22:34 pm »
Look into Validatley if we want to do product / UI research and development .  I saw their CEO present a couple weeks ago.. They could be an awesome service for us.

53
General Discussion / Re: Referring Celebrity Referrers
« on: November 05, 2015, 02:39:32 am »
The flaw in the approach is the off-chain agreement.

You are basically asking for a lifetime of administration over your account for this one refer. Even if it maybe big,

I understand you want the bird-dog, so what I would propose to do for you since this is something sizeable would be to give you your own faucet that runs outside our wallet. Essentially a sub-faucet that then directs to the wallet. Would be pretty much indistinguishable from the original, the URL would just be different.

That would probably be the easiest way to get it done for you for what you are describing.

Sub-faucets sounds great.  I could imagine a company scaling up this way - a subfaucet for each salesperson.

 Is this something BunkerChain Labs sees as a viable way of growing its business? 

54
General Discussion / Referring Celebrity Referrers
« on: November 05, 2015, 01:46:47 am »
Dear Cryptonomex, BunkerChain Labs, or any wallet company with a faucet:

Let's say I know a really popular celebrity, pretend it's Warren Buffet, who happens to have about 1.1MM fans on Twitter who are really into him because of their mutual interest in financial independence.

So Let's establish a scenario:

1) I want Mr. Buffet to refer his fan base to OpenLedger/BitShares.
2) He and I both want a percentage of his fans' total transaction fees.
3) If I establish an account for Mr. Buffet and he refers through OpenLedger, then he gets 60% of the transaction fees.  Which is great for him.
4) 20% of the fee goes to the network.
5) There is 20% between OpenLedger and Cryptonomex, who each take 10%.
6) The remaining question is this ... Are Cryptonomex and OpenLedger willing to make a deal with me to refer Warren Buffet to OpenLedger so that he becomes a referrer.
7) I assume all that CNX and OpenLedger would need is proof that I referred Mr. Buffet to OpenLedger and got him to tweet a link to OpenLedger.

Will Cryptonomex and OpenLedger make a deal with me to refer Warren Buffet? 

Let's establish a few more details:

1) The agreement would need to be verified and upheld off-blockchain.
2) The agreement could be for the life of Mr. Buffet's referrals through a specific account

Does anyone see any flaws in this approach?

Look forward to referring celebs, as well as YouTube and Twitter stars.

Edit: TL;DR -- Can a Wallet and Faucet company verify 2nd level referrals AND Is there anything stopping Wallet providers from establishing contracts for referring referrers?

55
General Discussion / Mentioned on TechCrunch
« on: November 04, 2015, 09:28:31 pm »
http://techcrunch.com/2015/10/31/liquid-bitcoin/

A big but subtle mention of Bitshares on Techcrunch.

56
General Discussion / Re: Cryptofresh Block Explorer [alpha]
« on: November 04, 2015, 08:59:50 pm »


Nice work.

Can you list in the profile page, i.e. http://cryptofresh.com/u/fav the referred accounts, "openledger-reg created account albertus79 thanks to fav"?

This is definitely possible... it's on my list :)

In the meantime, I've added two new charts to the homepage:
Top Proxies
Top Referrers
http://cryptofresh.com/

These numbers will be updated daily or so.

This is badass work, roadscape.

Also, Fav at 42... Is that just since the program went live?

since dacplays wallet went live.

That's great. Any estimate on cost of acquisition? 

57
General Discussion / Re: Cryptofresh Block Explorer [alpha]
« on: November 04, 2015, 08:55:06 pm »

Nice work.

Can you list in the profile page, i.e. http://cryptofresh.com/u/fav the referred accounts, "openledger-reg created account albertus79 thanks to fav"?

This is definitely possible... it's on my list :)

In the meantime, I've added two new charts to the homepage:
Top Proxies
Top Referrers
http://cryptofresh.com/

These numbers will be updated daily or so.

This is badass work, roadscape.

Also, Fav at 42... Is that just since the program went live?

58
General Discussion / Pitching Liquidity Providers
« on: November 04, 2015, 04:49:10 pm »
If someone were to pitch OpenLedger/BitShares to a bitcoin liquidity provider, what opportunity/benefits/mechanisms should be highlighted?

60

I've made an effort and now I can say I fully understand BM's concept of SQP but still I cannot see a major flaw in it.

OK attempt #4

If you understand BM's design you must already know that it requires certain market participants [namely short position holders] to buy assets at price 150% [in the original design]  above the market price [i.e. feed price].

If you find nothing wrong with this, I really do not think any argument in any language [even perfect English] will make you change your mind.

What would you recommend, 100% instead of 150%?

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 37