Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - carpet ride

Pages: 1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37
511
General Discussion / Re: Charles Hoskinson Left Ethereum?
« on: August 06, 2014, 02:45:31 am »
Quote
Ugg - All I want is a killer financial system (well, and a revolution in the music industry)

I've been building it one step at a time. With Bitshares you have the best new stock market and IPO system. Ethereum explores how to deploy smart contracts. What if we had efficient atomic cross chain pegging. Then you could link all those BitUSD together. If only there was a venture to bundle everything together :)

What would we need for such a venture?  :)

512
General Discussion / Re: Charles Hoskinson Left Ethereum?
« on: August 06, 2014, 02:41:08 am »

I also think Invictus has terrible marketing, a lack of strategic vision and a dilution of development efforts. Love me or hate me, the ether sale I helped sculpt is now at over 22,400 BTC https://blockchain.info/address/36PrZ1KHYMpqSyAQXSG8VwbUiq2EogxLo2. That's more than money, it's community belief in a project and a desire to participate. If you walked into the room and said this is bitshares! It's going to take IPOs away from goldman sachs and hand them back to the very companies launching them alongside all the infrastructure for the market to price and trade stock, then I think you would get a lot of support. Instead it's bitcoin is a badly run version of a DAC and we build better DACs- check out our music, lottery and DNS stuff. Oh forget about that Keyhotee thing too while you're at it.

Edit: CH is valid in many respects.

All I want is a killer financial system (and a revolution in the music industry)

513
General Discussion / Re: Charles Hoskinson Left Ethereum?
« on: August 06, 2014, 02:34:45 am »
CharlesHoskinson's points about filling out the financial system with additional tools and levers are valid. Building in smart contracts to handle complex derivatives would be extremely valuable to developing nations and thriving powers.  In the financial game, managing risk is paramount, and smart contracts should allow for these additional layers of risk management. 

514
General Discussion / Re: SEO Help Needed
« on: August 01, 2014, 09:34:00 pm »
Just bought bitsharesglobal.com

Going to blog about BitShares and point to BitShares related news.  Guest bloggers will be welcome!

edit: bitsharesglobal.com

515
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares Update on LetsTalkBitcoin show!
« on: July 27, 2014, 04:12:45 pm »
Should probably link the advertisement to bts-x, no?

edit: and maybe write "bitshares" under the logo?

516
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares Update on LetsTalkBitcoin show!
« on: July 27, 2014, 04:12:11 pm »
Should probably link the advertisement to bts-x, no?

517
welcome to the edge

518
General Discussion / Re: Associated Press, DAC
« on: July 25, 2014, 11:25:04 pm »
Bumping this.

AP Shares.. Can we get some forum space for this?

Maybe list it on the various websites?

Any additional thoughts on the AP DAC as it would work on a DPOS blockchain?

519
General Discussion / Re: A Call to the Truthcoin Prediction Market
« on: July 16, 2014, 11:19:09 pm »
I just thought I would update everyone:

(1)  Although toast has expressed a desire to bang out a working version of this, he has been severely distracted by BtsX. The tentative arrangement we discussed did involve (at least) 20% of the Vote-ownership (not coin ownership, please see my presentation draft to learn more about this) going to AGS/PTS holders.

(2)  I am still working on Truthcoin in my spare time, and I may hire one or two freelancers to help. If so, I will feel less inclined to give away the ownership at all (as no one has been helping), or I may airdrop to Bitcoin for the superior network effects. In other words, it remains possible that AGS/PTS owners may "miss out" on their chance to own Truthcoin.

(3)  My feeling is that my project would be much simpler and faster to implement than BtsX (my understanding is that toast agrees). My personal opinion is also that it would be more successful. I would probably be happy if Bitsharestalk made a bunch of noise and diverted some developer talent here (or made some noise at Bitcointalk or something). As the project-owner, I unfortunately am in a bad position to make noise, as it appears selfish.

(4)  In general, I'm hoping that the devs at BTS will learn a lot from their BtsX experience and use that for my project.

AI, I hope I get to participate in some kind of sharedrop that you do; whether that's through PTS/AGS or BTC. I seriously doubt there's any chance you'll get the bitshares/invictus folks to divert energy from BTSX in the forseeable future. I mean, clearly, BTSX is bitshares/invictus. It's the first project idea they had, the reason they founded the company, and the only one (of their ideas) that people are terribly interested in.

I certainly hope you don't take it as a rebuff or an affront that they won't take time away from BTSX to work on your project, since BTSX is simply the thing that makes them what they are. It is my sincere hope that before too long you'll be able to get some bitshares devs working on your project. If you can't wait that long, then I wish you well and I'll keep an eye on truthcoin wherever it ends up.

A successful BTSX would fund this project.

521
Seems like others are having a hard time keeping up with our latest developments as his recent article made no mention of DPOS.  That is perhaps a failure on our part.

V's response to DPOS:

[–]vbuterin 1 point 5 minutes ago
I would say its resistance to long-range NaS is the biggest concern, and that's dependent entirely on the implementation. Theoretically DPOS is something that could be layered onto any other PoS algorithm; it's actually a slightly higher-level construction than naive PoS, slasher, TaPoS, etc.

What is long-range NaS?

522
Seems like others are having a hard time keeping up with our latest developments as his recent article made no mention of DPOS.  That is perhaps a failure on our part.

V's response to DPOS:

[–]vbuterin 1 point 5 minutes ago
I would say its resistance to long-range NaS is the biggest concern, and that's dependent entirely on the implementation. Theoretically DPOS is something that could be layered onto any other PoS algorithm; it's actually a slightly higher-level construction than naive PoS, slasher, TaPoS, etc.

523
Can anyone that answers 'Yes.' explain why?

524
Marketplace / Re: Talent search: HTML5/CSS guru. Referral reward.
« on: June 24, 2014, 06:59:45 pm »
Post this to freelancer.com and I guarantee you'll attract a ton of artists.

Referral for anyone from freelancer!

525
General Discussion / Delegate fee allocation
« on: June 22, 2014, 03:54:16 am »
If BTS X reaches the point where $100 million in transaction fees are accrued yearly and $1 million is distributed to each delegate, then how will the delegate be likely to use his or her dividends?

1- Marketing his or her reputation? 

2 - Technological upgrades for the network?

3 - Funding for start-up DACs & Marketing promotions for ancillary DACs?

4 - Salaries / Bonuses?

5 - Charitable donations?


Pages: 1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37