Great start! Would it make more sense in this sense to call blockchains a new *protocol* for DAPs? I dig your graphics (and as Ben said, be sure to double-check spelling ).. you can never have too many. Maybe make the existing images on your 2nd post bigger... would be nice to preview them without opening a new tab.. plus, they really pop

Protocol instead of feature. ... I agree!  Images are enlarged now... much better... thanks!  Info graphics needed major edits....thanks

I really like 'Certain Assets' .......it quite subtly piqued my interest and prepared my mind for making important distinctions.....

The posts are well reasoned, interesting and informative with an exciting general direction. 

One small but important criticism, check spelling and grammar to remove the occasional error.  It's worth the effort!

As to the blockchain subject, I agree that all blockchains could be DAPs but not all DAPs are blockchains, but I hope you'll discuss the importance of the rules (economics, execution, security, governance, scope etc) governing the blockchain. Without a strong consensus for the rules/constitution governing the blockchain and the means by which it adapts, the blockchain/network/DAP will have limited utility/robustness/longevity.  The blockchain and constitution are inextricably linked because that is where the trust for a trustless network lies.  I know I keep saying it, but trust is everything.

Anyway, keep going!

Wow, amazing feedback! Thank you 

I agree resiliency mechanisms are important for businesses and consumers alike.  I'm brainstorming titles, the first could be something like, "How to know you chose a good blockchain".  As for editing, I'll need to improve, haha. Thanks!

Put a blog together to write about blockchain 3.0.  The second post is up: Businesses in Blockchain v3.0. Check it out, and feedback is appreciated.

http://www.certainassets.com

Quote from: delulo on October 02, 2015, 09:39:26 am

Let's brainstorm about what players and roles exist in the graphene ecosystem. At the moment I have:

- The respective graphene blockchain (Bitshares, Identabit, Muse)
- Cryptonomex (once  as a backend software software provider and once as a front end software provider / implementation partner / technical referral partner)
- The industry specific entrepreneurs (follow may vote, open ledger etc.)
- Affiliate marketers
- Users

By Players do you mean naming companies as well like CCEDK? Or are you asking just in a general sense? Perhaps not since you specifically named CNX. Please clarify though.

Someone else in another thread (have to find it) made a mindmap of the current ecosystem as well as a few of the other leaders in other chains. That could be a really good starting point too.

Can send this in editable format if you like.

I hate to say it but this conversation is just bad PR. BM I would advise to put your disclaimer about child porn in every post of yours above.

I've added some color and made some changes.  I'd appreciate any feedback.

How is bitshares permissionless when it comes to orediction markets?  Only  exchange function is decentralized

Is augur decentralized?

How about sharedropping on major politicians?  Imagine hundreds of congress and senate delegates who hold bitshares and other Graphene assets.