Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - stuartcharles

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19
181
DAC PLAY / Re: Nothing but a Lotto DAC Business Graph
« on: May 22, 2014, 06:56:07 pm »
Quote from: Bytemaster
There has been significant progress and developments over the past several days.   One of the most significant is the introduction of a random number generation scheme and random delegate selection today.   This was done for two reasons: it resolves a security vulnerability discovered with sequential DPOS and it facilitates one of the more challenging parts of the Lotto DAC.

We have implemented UPNP networking.


The news getting better and better

Right

Great work, I was just trying to find out why bitshares are going up and found your project. I look forward to further updates :-)

182
General Discussion / Re: MaidSafe IPO on Mastercoin
« on: April 24, 2014, 09:05:36 am »
Surly the demand comes from people wanting to use more computer power than they have, and that supply is met by thous with extra computer power selling there spare capacity. The medium of exchange is safecoin?

To my mind its impossible to know if they have a good economic model until we see what people do with the system, will people demand more power than they have (price goes up) or will there be more power than people demand (price goes down).

What could be done with all that processing power? unimaginably virtual worlds? Extremely cheap laptops where you pay purely for what processing power bandwidth you use.

What a great time it is to be alive and see all this unfold and evolve

If they implement bytemaster's advice:
3) charge* users any time they consume more than they produce

* I think it's obvious they must charge safecoins...

how else would it work if you didn't charge users for using resources? If they didn't put that in the white paper it must have been a case of not needing to state the obvious?.... i hope!

183
General Discussion / Re: MaidSafe IPO on Mastercoin
« on: April 24, 2014, 07:35:59 am »
Surly the demand comes from people wanting to use more computer power than they have, and that supply is met by thous with extra computer power selling there spare capacity. The medium of exchange is safecoin?

To my mind its impossible to know if they have a good economic model until we see what people do with the system, will people demand more power than they have (price goes up) or will there be more power than people demand (price goes down).

What could be done with all that processing power? unimaginably virtual worlds? Extremely cheap laptops where you pay purely for what processing power bandwidth you use.

What a great time it is to be alive and see all this unfold and evolve

184
General Discussion / Re: MaidSafe IPO on Mastercoin
« on: April 23, 2014, 09:32:37 pm »

Quotes from: AdamBLevine on Today at 05:57:24 PM

Quote
...I'm a little curious what great insight you have Daniel?

Quote
launch something before you take the time to gloat about other peoples success.

Set him up, then smack him down.  Nice.

the schadenfreude was going on way before I showed up, he was not defining it just saying that he would help them fix, and of course flatly saying that nobody understands economics.

Sorry guys, I spend about 5% the time on your project I used to so I don't have time to respond to everything.  I just wish you would work instead of talking about everybody elses failings when you are so unable to deal with your own.

"I just wish you would work instead of talking about everybody elses failings" Im sure something similar is going through a lot of heads as they read this string but lets not forget that you have to be fiercely competitive to win and that is all you are seeing here, bring it on chaps!

185
Is high frequency trading possible? Block times are 30 seconds.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

186
General Discussion / Re: Airdrop poll?
« on: April 12, 2014, 08:17:46 am »
Personally I never claimed my MMC coins because the value was negligible, but I'm interested in other people's threshold for actually downloading a wallet and claiming free shares in something.

I didnt claim either, but, as i understand it MMC are always there to be claimed if the value were to rise. This influenced my decision, would it be the same with the self pruning blockchain? If not would you have been more keen to claim your coins?

Personally i don't think its dollar value so much as the potential you personally see in the idea backing it.

187
Becoming a delegate requires:

1) Ability to run provided software on a low-latency connection 
2) Ability to setup a secure linux environment
3) Ability to get 1% of the vote...
      a) unique geographic location
      b) trusted member of the community
      c) 1000 BIPS  (a couple of PTS or AGS) registration fee... (keep out spammers)

Remaining a delegate requires:
      a) low latency, 99.9% uptime
      b) non-discrimination of valid transactions
      c) better reputation than all but the top 99

How to earn the best reputation:
      a) Provide the most additional services for your pay.
            - seed node supporting thousands of connections
            - block explorers
            - free web wallets
            - high speed blockchain downloads
      b) Provide the most proof as to your transparency
     

You get the idea... who ever is willing to provide the most service for their pay will likely win over someone attempting to provide the least service. 
 
     

Thanks, have you decided what hardware will the software be running on?

188
Apart from the explained 1% of votes, a good internet connection and continuous proximity to your hardware to ensure up time. what will a representative need. In particular :-
Type of hardware
Will software be supplied
Technical knowledge? will your average crypto miner have enough knowledge to be a representative or will more in depth coding knowledge be required?

Any other requirements i haven't mentioned?

190
General Discussion / Re: Draft Talk for NYC [VIDEO]
« on: April 03, 2014, 09:04:04 am »
'I agree with IRS' - that should go down well :D

Its very interesting how you explain Bitcoins. In your view if you have to design a currency how would you go about it? Or, since as you said, anything can be used as a currency, you wouldn't bother?

I think this quote is something you should take note of. It is made by an active member.
May be you should consider promoting the golden goose more than knocking bitcoin. Obviously this is a criticism but not meant in a harsh way. You speak well and with authority over your subject, however, you are their to make friends (investors, players) and catch some publicity. 

Most of the people you will be speaking to will be heavily invested in bitcoin and wont want to hear it knocked despite your points being correct. If i was you i would be using the time to explain what bitusd can do and then telling people if they what to learn more to visit the website.

If you still feel its necessary to knock bitcoin then at least point out that it still has the properties of gold as a store of wealth and is easier to transport. There was a quote on Bloomberg recently saying if bitcoin took 10% of the gold market it would be worth 100 times its current value. Now, if that's what bitcoin could be worth without the ability to be used easily as a currency what could bitshares be worth with the ability to carry out evey day transactions in bitusd?

however you decide to play it, good luck.  I wish i could b there.

191
General Discussion / Re: Board of Directors vs Mining Pool Operators
« on: April 02, 2014, 10:23:35 am »
I like it a lot, do we need to vote? why don't we just randomly pick a 1% or grater share holder that is online. If the intensive is reasonable then most of them will be online anyway.

Or if you feel a vote is necessary to give everyone a chance not just the initial supporters of the project then. Should it be that you need 1% of the vote period. Any extra votes are excluded or passed to a chosen second or third candidate. That way you are always ensured to have close to or 100 operational computers/servers available to sign the blocks.

192
Thats how i feel, frustrated, i know you are doing your best, i know your knowledge far out ways mine, but this is our moment. Bitusd was conceived to combat the market volatility of bitcoin, but, the recent US ruling that bitcoin is property projects bitusd to the only cripto currency that can be used as currency.

This is our chance right now, not in a month when someone develops software to automatically calculate capital gains tax the second you make a transaction but now.

I know i am shouting from the sidelines, but please reassure your fans that you understand the importance of this moment in time. The position of all players on the field is perfect for bitshares to dominate the game, don't give the competition time to regroup and counter attack.

Your faithfully, wearing my bitshares jacket, scarf and hat

193
General Discussion / Re: drltc's Trustee Technical Discussion Thread
« on: April 02, 2014, 09:23:40 am »
Respect to DrLtc, Bytemaster and the rest of you problem solvers

194
General Discussion / Re: drltc's Trustee Technical Discussion Thread
« on: April 01, 2014, 09:04:08 am »
Submitted without further comment:



helpful that Stan, thanks.
Can you also explain how we pick the gnome and how he gets paid?

195
General Discussion / Re: drltc's Trustee Technical Discussion Thread
« on: March 31, 2014, 08:51:21 pm »

The key thing with notaries is that they must be prepared to have servers with very high uptime and redundancy. 

If you have multiple notaries, this is unnecessary.  In fact, having multiple notaries and fast recovery from a single notary going offline means that there's really no reason an ordinary node can't serve as notary.

So I propose using a random selection algorithm (Poisson process) to add notaries one at a time, and have the oldest notary's term expire if there are too many.  Thus notary duty is not for some elite users with fast servers and connections to the right people to get into a hard-coded list somewhere, rather it is open to any node, with your chance to be selected proportional to your balance.  (As I've explained previously, both here and elsewhere, not using your balance to determine the weight of your vote makes it easy to game the system by making a large number of addresses with tiny balances.)  You get the benefits of fork protection and predictable block times, but the degree of centralization is actually quite limited.

To alleviate uptime concerns, I propose a five-stage scheme:  Unknown, pending, eligible, secondary, primary.  Unknown nodes are most of the network most of the time.  Pending nodes have been selected by the random selection algorithm as potential notaries, but they have to pass an uptime test by signing every block for UPTIME_TEST_LENGTH = 1 hour.  Eligible nodes have successfully passed the uptime test and are waiting for a "seat" to open up.  Secondary / primary refer to active notaries; primary notary duty rotates every block.

sounds good, and the reward for keeping your node live is you are entering a lottery for the reward?

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19