Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - lib

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17
226
General Discussion / Re: Problem with http://www.btc38.com/
« on: November 16, 2013, 05:13:12 am »
Did you set your BTC withdraw address or not?

227
Marketplace / Re: [WTS] 300 PTS @0,0065 Each
« on: November 14, 2013, 10:41:49 pm »
PM answered. Please check it and yes I want to buy them all together.

228
Marketplace / Re: [WTS] 350 PTS @ 0.0075 BTC
« on: November 14, 2013, 10:23:31 pm »
I want to buy. Sent you a PM.

229
Marketplace / Re: [WTS] 300 PTS @0,0065 Each
« on: November 14, 2013, 10:20:14 pm »
Have you sold yet?I want to buy.

230
Quote
attempting to connect to the-iland.net
725862ms th_a       miner.cpp:108                 main                 ] 64.90.183.137:8384
725870ms th_a       miner.cpp:114                 main                 ] unspecified
Broken pipe
    {"message":"Broken pipe"}
    asio  asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect
^C

what's the problem?

Pool down for a moment while I update to 0.2.0 backend... be back shortly.

bytemaster is updating the pool.

231
************** ATTENTION *******************

We are preparing a hard fork that would allow the difficulty to increase by 32x every 4032 blocks.  This is the fork that will be honored by Invictus Innovations as the foundation of future block chains.

We will post new Windows and Mac binaries within the next several hours, hopefully before the next difficulty adjustment.

Those in my pool will automatically be updated to join the new fork. 

I believe that there is enough hash power and market forces to support such a fork. 

If there are any solid objections, speak now.

Is the pool already updated to the new fork? I got these error and I didn't reuse the address at that moment.

"
  valid: 14  invalid: 2  balance: 0.513083  paid: 0  pps: 0.0366488  address: PgRPEXP4NUR54ysGjViJjuVsa8TfuzAPSf  hpm: 9.40007
  valid: 14  invalid: 2  balance: 0.513083  paid: 0  pps: 0.0366488  address: PgRPEXP4NUR54ysGjViJjuVsa8TfuzAPSf  hpm: 9.44454
  valid: 15  invalid: 2  balance: 0.549732  paid: 0  pps: 0.0366488  address: PgRPEXP4NUR54ysGjViJjuVsa8TfuzAPSf  hpm: 9.55342
  valid: 0  invalid: 0  balance: 0  paid: 0  pps: 0.0366488  address: PgRPEXP4NUR54ysGjViJjuVsa8TfuzAPSf  hpm: 9.55769
  valid: 0  invalid: 0  balance: 0  paid: 0  pps: 0.0366488  address: PgRPEXP4NUR54ysGjViJjuVsa8TfuzAPSf  hpm: 9.60194
  valid: 0  invalid: 0  balance: 0  paid: 0  pps: 0.0366488  address: PgRPEXP4NUR54ysGjViJjuVsa8TfuzAPSf  hpm: 9.57349

"

One of the cpu_miner instances quit using the same address. So that maybe the reason.

232
************** ATTENTION *******************

We are preparing a hard fork that would allow the difficulty to increase by 32x every 4032 blocks.  This is the fork that will be honored by Invictus Innovations as the foundation of future block chains.

We will post new Windows and Mac binaries within the next several hours, hopefully before the next difficulty adjustment.

Those in my pool will automatically be updated to join the new fork. 

I believe that there is enough hash power and market forces to support such a fork. 

If there are any solid objections, speak now.

Is the pool already updated to the new fork? I got these error and I didn't reuse the address at that moment.

"
  valid: 14  invalid: 2  balance: 0.513083  paid: 0  pps: 0.0366488  address: PgRPEXP4NUR54ysGjViJjuVsa8TfuzAPSf  hpm: 9.40007
  valid: 14  invalid: 2  balance: 0.513083  paid: 0  pps: 0.0366488  address: PgRPEXP4NUR54ysGjViJjuVsa8TfuzAPSf  hpm: 9.44454
  valid: 15  invalid: 2  balance: 0.549732  paid: 0  pps: 0.0366488  address: PgRPEXP4NUR54ysGjViJjuVsa8TfuzAPSf  hpm: 9.55342
  valid: 0  invalid: 0  balance: 0  paid: 0  pps: 0.0366488  address: PgRPEXP4NUR54ysGjViJjuVsa8TfuzAPSf  hpm: 9.55769
  valid: 0  invalid: 0  balance: 0  paid: 0  pps: 0.0366488  address: PgRPEXP4NUR54ysGjViJjuVsa8TfuzAPSf  hpm: 9.60194
  valid: 0  invalid: 0  balance: 0  paid: 0  pps: 0.0366488  address: PgRPEXP4NUR54ysGjViJjuVsa8TfuzAPSf  hpm: 9.57349

"

233
Yikes... you just hosed your system...    I can post a DL link for the original file for OS X 10.8.4 if you need it.

Sure. That would be very kind of you.  :D

http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/libSystem.B.dylib

Thank you very much bytemaster!

Actually I compared the md5 of "/usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib" and the same file in alpha_miner and the two are same.
That means I overwrite "libstdc++" with yours,  not "libSystem.B".
I contacted the service center of Apple. They suggested me to reinstall my system but I don't think it's needed.

Any simple method that I can recover my original "libstdc++.6.dylib"?

234
Yikes... you just hosed your system...    I can post a DL link for the original file for OS X 10.8.4 if you need it.

Sure. That would be very kind of you.  :D

235
I got this error in OS X 10.8.4. Anyone knows how to fix it? :D

dyld: Symbol not found: ___emutls_get_address
  Expected in: /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib


Did you move the opt folder to /opt?

Thanks for help.

First I "cp opt/local/lib/*.dylib /opt/local/lib/"

Then it told me
dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: __ZNKSt8__detail20_Prime_rehash_policy11_M_next_bktEm
Expected in: /usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib


After "cp opt/local/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib /usr/lib/lib" the "System.B" error shows up.

Ok... I will build a Qt GUI for this that will just run with a double click.   

But lets try one thing first...

mv /opt  to /oldopt
mv myopt to /opt

Then run it.

I am very new to OS system and sorry to bother.
I am afraid when I did the "cp opt/local/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib /usr/lib/" operation, the original file was covered by the new one.
So now there is some problem with my system.

"sudo: unable to initialize PAM: No such file or directory" shows up when I using "sudo" command. And new applications can not be started.
So I am going to do some google search to see what going on. Thanks again :D

236
I got this error in OS X 10.8.4. Anyone knows how to fix it? :D

dyld: Symbol not found: ___emutls_get_address
  Expected in: /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib


Did you move the opt folder to /opt?

Thanks for help.

First I "cp opt/local/lib/*.dylib /opt/local/lib/"

Then it told me
dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: __ZNKSt8__detail20_Prime_rehash_policy11_M_next_bktEm
Expected in: /usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib


After "cp opt/local/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib /usr/lib/lib" the "System.B" error shows up.

237
I got this error in OS X 10.8.4. Anyone knows how to fix it? :D

dyld: Symbol not found: ___emutls_get_address
  Expected in: /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib


238
I want in. :D

239
Pc4NMT8QHbsRhtxQ7DPUTMedJtBRCrQdPA

Thank you :)

And I always got this error when i trying to sign up DO. Does that means too many people using it now?

"Oops! It looks like you were making too many requests and so you have been throttled.

Please try again in 60 seconds.
"

240
Any volunteers for managing the market?

Any requirement? Maybe I can have a try.

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17