https://dgx-public.slack.com/archives/random/p1460393280000755


hughlang
5:48 PM I think there’s a scammy algorithm on metaexchange that gradually increases the buy price as you continue to send to the same ETH address. I had to send to 2 accounts this morning and I saw it start at one price and move up with each transaction.
5:48
As is, the bid-ask spread starts at 10% which is terrible.
5:49
Since i don’t have a choice, I guess I have to take it. I only have 1 BTC left to send, so I’m only going to get scammed for another 5%

@ccedk any reason why Lisk is being traded before release and Digix will not? Just curious!

I think this is exactly what is needed. If OpenLedger keeps this up, it will be the "go to" place to trade the most recent coins. People will look for and expect OpenLedger to list them and will trade them there. It can create demand for OL. Maker, Digix and Lisk. The timing is right because atm people are throwing money at everything expecting another Ether like event. With this OL can get the acknowledgement and buzz it needed.

People expect Polo to add these new coins but they dont seem too responsive so it's a good chance to snatch some traders. Then it's just a matter of time until people get used to the platform.

Q: Crypto has really diversified in the last couple of years - there are protocols out there for just about everything. Anonymity, smart contracts, 2.0, storage, proof-of-audit, blockchain-as-a-service… What will WAVES’ unique selling point be?

A: We're focusing on mass adoption. It might seem to be a little pretentious, but our focus is exactly that - we're building the system with a very flat learning curve, with interfaces familiar from online banking and trading experiences, integrated fiat currencies, and with the main user client being just a browser plugin. After the plugin installation a user has a decentralized kickstarter/payment system functionality right in ther browser!

LOL the type of answer that answers nothing. Every project wants mass adoption. I'm yet to know what their unique selling point is. What functionalities will they focus on? What will be the main objective of whatever they're building?

Honestly this kind of seems like bitshares, just on a different chain.

For those that don’t know, Troopeers is PeerTracks, the non-music-specific aspect of it. It allows anyone that has or wants a fan base to create his token so that he may be discovered, funded, etc. Troopeers is simply an extension that of the original objective that tackles other markets such as sports, acting/movies, instagram stars, streamers, etc. The music branch of Troopeers is PeerTracks – that branch requires its own, more complex, feature set (music player, royalty splitter, etc).

So the muse token represents solely the music branch of Troopeers? So if you want to go towards other branch like sports or movies, it will have to be done on a different chain? Or it can be done all on the same chain and our current token represents all the branches Troopers can reach out to?

Quote from: ccedk on April 05, 2016, 06:27:54 am

Quote from: tbone on April 04, 2016, 11:19:42 pm

Quote from: bytemaster on April 04, 2016, 09:25:27 pm

I am looking for someone to create a step-by-step guide with screenshots on how to deposit OPEN.BTC into your BitShares account.

These instructions will be used as part of a marketing push for STEEM that will direct users to BitShares which will start out as the exclusive exchange where STEEM is traded. 

If we play this right BitShares can ride the STEEM publicity and we can get some new traders into the exchange.

Having exclusive assets that people want to trade is one of the best ways of bootstrapping BitShares.

Ideally the guide would be done in MARKDOWN.

This will be great to have in place so we can be ready for LISK traders as well.  LISK launches next Monday.

Ronny (@ccedk): will we have LISK trading on the DEX when it launches?

Have asked Max for an update via skype.

FYI:  Apparently Yobit participated in the Lisk ICO and have already made YOBIT.LISK available to trade on their site.  Currently it is trading at 15X ICO price.  It's creating a buzz for Yobit, which might even put them on the map.  That's exactly what OpenLedger needs.   @ccedk

https://yobit.net/en/trade/LISK/BTC

What a shame not being able to sell mine meh. We should have done as @Erlich Bachman said.

@ccedk have you thought about doing this?

I like it, but what's up with this service now having cards and the Nano Card from CCEDK never ended up working? So you just shifted from one to another?

If it's not working it seems the same mistakes are being made again, promise of a lot of things while they are not yet ready.

I like the initiative, it finally sounds like something that could be like CoinBase or something, but what about OpenLedger? There are just too many projects. Eventually some will get neglected. It just seems too much.

If this becomes part of the Conglomerate, why not simply replacing OpenLedger? Or this is a new service that could run on top of OpenLedger?

What about CCEDK? So you have this new exchange now? Will it be replacing CCEDK?

It seems too much and too confusing.