Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - iruu

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
16
Quote
Therefore, you can limit the profitability and attractiveness of mining pools by having all new currency that is created vest for a period of 6 months.
Basically nobody is going to use this currency.
That's it. 
If there are indeed good ideas in it, it's going to be copied by an alt without arbitrary and ridiculous restrictions. 

The people who mine in large amounts are just more valuable. They're either more interested, more knowledgeable, have more money, or all of it. These are the people you want invested in an idea to make it happen. 
They're better for the currency. 

It's the same in real life. It's better to have an experienced investor with contacts rather than thousands of micro shareholders.

Do you really believe that forcibly distributing all of capital productive to everyone in the world would result in a better economic outcome?

Quote
These bulk purchases benefited the mass-miners and not the creators of the crypto-currency.
Don't let excessive greed kill your ideas prematurely, because THAT'S the true issue, isn't it? It's better to have 1% of a currency worth 0.01BTC/PTS rather than 50% of a currency worth 0.000001BTC/PTS (or BTS).

17
General Discussion / Re: Coingrounds PTS Exchange - trading back up!
« on: November 19, 2013, 05:04:37 pm »
Exchange currently takes 4.985% of my withdrawals, no matter if donation is ticked or not. 
This is an issue from the beginning, but donation rate is not constant. Transaction size doesn't matter.

One test transaction: (from fiddler)
Quote
POST https://www.coingrounds.com/socket.io/1/xhr-polling/-z2CS6_t5b4ATJqhzOCf?t=1384875527383 HTTP/1.1
Host: www.coingrounds.com
Connection: keep-alive
Content-Length: 152
Origin: https://www.coingrounds.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.57 Safari/537.36
Content-type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8
Accept: */*
Referer: https://www.coingrounds.com/profile
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate,sdch
Accept-Language: pl-PL,pl;q=0.8,en-US;q=0.6,en;q=0.4
Cookie: connect.sid=<removed>

5:::{"name":"update_user","args":[{"action":"withdraw","address":"17ukgazKLiavmDELCgrmrrXueQ5Ww5JQHM","amount":"0.01","currency":"BTC","donate":false}]}

Result: got 0.00943,  should be 0.0099 (Fees 0.0001 BTC).

https://blockchain.info/address/17ukgazKLiavmDELCgrmrrXueQ5Ww5JQHM

I think it started when I actually ticked the donation checkbox during one withdrawal about a week ago...

18
@AnonyMint at this point gpu miner isn't going to prove anything really

19
Marketplace / Re: WTB 1000 PTS @ .019 BTC [CLOSED]
« on: November 18, 2013, 07:55:52 am »
;)

Transaction visible. Thanks for trade!

20
Marketplace / Re: WTB 1000 PTS @ .019 BTC
« on: November 18, 2013, 07:51:38 am »
Can sell 450PTS, 8.55BTC total. Agreed?

My btc address:  1EsqRgBq9fswdfmv7sSpf5ct32b98ZPAbm

Yes, please send your PTS first: Pvaow1qm5kNYLshsAcTArM4Vnpt8bvHGzn
Done df838b7060fbae553ddc485bf01866fa08a736317a39ac20f2131cf4660dd0d1

21
Marketplace / Re: WTB 1000 PTS @ .019 BTC
« on: November 18, 2013, 07:24:26 am »
Can sell 450PTS, 8.55BTC total. Agreed?

My btc address:  1EsqRgBq9fswdfmv7sSpf5ct32b98ZPAbm

22
BitShares PTS / Re: Confirmation time, is this normal?
« on: November 17, 2013, 07:46:20 pm »
Let's discard all transactions and sell our mined pts! What could possibly go wrong?

23
Thank you. What a weird bug in client.

24
/tried to donate but the PYY address won't validate in the ProtoShares 0.8.5 wallet
WTF

Are you using client from before the hard fork?

Also, all clients versions are the same (yeah...).

If so, better change it, I think you can possibly lose your coins or at least have big problems with transactions

25
GPU algorithms are better for botnets (only recently). As of now, all cloud gpus are nvidias, but botnets can use users' gpus. Nowadays even a $200 amd pc has a powerful apu (or intel with cheap radeon, etc). 

I mean, even on reddit there's an ama - I think it was about 1.5 year ago - with a botnet operator. He mined bitcoins on users' gpus...

Now people without botnets at least can mine, it's not like renting servers is somehow restricted to wealthy individuals.

Edit, found
Most important quote from ama (although not from author):
Quote
Asian installs are very cheap, 15$/1000 installs and have good GPUs.
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/sq7cy/iama_a_malware_coder_and_botnet_operator_ama/c4mu8oj

So, yeah.


26
LOL@1 BTC

Even at hour wage for a competent gpu programmer that's a slave's pay - but if someone were to make this he could make way more just by mining

27
Alternative statistics - http://54.219.131.208/pts/<your pool pts address> :)
- daily total
- hourly production

Note - this parses the ptsweb server's output - so if ptsweb is down, this is also down. This is also the cause of the latency.

Example:


http://54.219.131.208/pts/PangZLLrnCfKRadGm1Xxy55AncqJxDr7sj



28
BitShares PTS / Re: How many PTS do you have
« on: November 15, 2013, 08:53:57 pm »
I'm all new to cryptocoins anno 2013. I have no BTC and with BTC on the rise it's not the right time to buy just to be able to buy PTS. That's a lose-lose battle right now. I wish there was a USD->PTS Exchange available.
BTC doesn't rise THAT fast, you can buy btc then pts in one hour or less.

29
BitShares PTS / Re: Fight the bots!
« on: November 15, 2013, 07:47:14 pm »
2) Unfortunately, with the current bot situation, with the bots out there everyone is getting something like 0.000000001 per round vs 0.02 per round pre-bots. The goal is letting your hashes make an actual difference against the pools whereas now they are just giving you pennies.
But that's just not true, I'm currently mining about 25PTS/hour without a botnet, there are many people with larger power. Why did you expect to mine a fortune with your personal desktop?
Also, the difficulty is much higher.

Quote
3) They can read the forums and will have to change all their bots accordingly. But this adds work on their end to have to point the bots in the right direction.
This also adds to everyone's work, but botnet operators get the biggest payout for theirs.

Quote
4) If all the hashes are coming from a single proxy, the pool operator can block the IP of the hash flood.
And "fair" big miners are supposed to go and say to the pool operator "hey I'm not a botnet, you can allow me"? Not only this is ridiculous, it's completely ineffective.

Last but not least, for all that restrictions, everyone serious would just mine solo or on another pool. Stupid pools wouldn't be finding *ANY* blocks at all.

30
BitShares PTS / Re: Fight the bots!
« on: November 15, 2013, 06:17:00 pm »
Quote
This payout scheme means that some workers get paid more for their work and others get paid less for their work.

What is this, communism? Why should better miners get penalized?

Quote
Each pool sets up a secondary pool (separate IP) through which everyone else can connect.

Because botnet operators can't read forum apparently

Quote
For the solo miners with large farms, set up a virtual proxy. Point all your machines to this single machine, and change the port forwarding rules accordingly. If any bot farmers go this route, pools can quickly identify them and point them to the 99.9% pool based on IP (or IP ban).
I don't understand this one. How does a virtual proxy make detecting botnets easier? And why is the proxy "virtual" when it is in fact an actual proxy?

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4