Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - profitofthegods

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8
76
I just published a post on my new blog entitled 'How to Trade on the Bitshares Decentralized Exchange':

http://cryptorials.io/trade-bitshares-decentralized-exchange/

I want to make sure there's no mistakes and also add in anything I've missed so any feedback would be great. I'll try to keep it updated as things change, and to add more Bitshares related posts if possible.

Also, if anybody wants to write Bitshares related tutorials for a small fee then please let me know as I am looking for writers for more advanced / technical topics which I may not be able to cover so well myself. Please contact me with suggestions before writing anything to make sure its suitable and to discuss a price.

77
Technical Support / Re: !!! Stupid Questions Thread !!!
« on: January 11, 2015, 01:04:59 pm »
On the short screen there is a field for 'interest and I can't work out what its all about - does the person shorting pay interest to the bitasset holder? If so when is it paid? Is it paid in bts or added to your bitasset debt?

Shorters compete to be first in line to have their shorted asset bought by the amount of interest they are offering (highest offered interest rate get purchased first). The interest goes in to a pool and is distributed to all holders of that asset when they make a transaction. Until they "move" their asset, the amount of "interest" they are earning shows up in the "Expected Yield" column of their account.

At least that's how I understand it.

Thanks, when does the interest go into a pool (daily, weekly, monthly?) and is it payable in BTS or the Asset?

78
Technical Support / Re: !!! Stupid Questions Thread !!!
« on: January 11, 2015, 12:37:13 am »
On the short screen there is a field for 'interest and I can't work out what its all about - does the person shorting pay interest to the bitasset holder? If so when is it paid? Is it paid in bts or added to your bitasset debt?

79
Technical Support / Re: Wallet Not Synching
« on: December 09, 2014, 01:31:43 pm »
0.4.25 will be out this week with a some stability fixes and other bugfixes. It's probably best to wait for it and see if any of these problems go away.

OK, thanks.

80
Technical Support / Re: Wallet Not Synching
« on: December 08, 2014, 07:59:41 pm »
I should have added, during a previous attempt after a number of failures to even log in, I tried to restore from a backup. I've just read somewhere that this probably wasn't a good idea, and in any case I think I did it wrong, lol. I now have a message with the following:

Code: [Select]
getStackTrace@app.js:26:8827
 ○ request@app.js:30:24118
 ○ get_config@app.js:29:35629
 ○ app.js:29:62506
 ○ j@app.js:6:39741
 ○ app.js:6:27204
 ○ $eval@app.js:6:48397
 ○ $digest@app.js:6:47106
 ○ $apply@app.js:6:48723
 ○ f@app.js:5:92484
 ○ r@app.js:6:4852
 ○ onreadystatechange@app.js:6:5391
10 assert_exception: Assert Exception
now >= start_timestamp:
    {}
    bitshares  chain_interface.cpp:81 bts::blockchain::chain_interface::get_max_delegate_pay_per_block

    {}
    bitshares  common_api_client.cpp:19 bts::rpc_stubs::common_api_client::blockchain_get_info

Have I permanently screwed this account? I have no coins in it so I guess its not a disaster if I have (which is why I was so cavalier about trying things when I didn't know what I was doing), but I'd like to be able to recover the account names.

81
Technical Support / Wallet Not Synching
« on: December 08, 2014, 07:36:50 pm »
I haven't been able to get a wallet working for a while now. Half the time it crashes, and when it does let me log in it never syncs, even though it shows connections. I have downloaded the wallet again today from bitshares.org, but I'm not even sure if this site is providing an up-to-date download - I just got 0.4.24.1 from there today. I have also tried deleting everything in the 'chain' folder.

Can anybody tell me what else I can try?

82
General Discussion / Specialization of Delegates
« on: November 13, 2014, 07:29:57 pm »
In principle, would it be possible to create a DAC in which there would be multiple classes of delegates?

In this system you may have 10 delegates elected in each of 10 categories, for example, to reach your 100 total. If this is possible, would it be also be possible for each class of delegate to have a different probability of generating a block (meaning higher pay for some classes than others)?

83
I think that's what I meant, just used the wrong word. I'll definitely be interested in buying / trading this then. Perhaps gold too. Thanks.
I have a feeling GLD will be next .. some feeds already out there .. will add mine once the new release-candidate is running

Cool, looking forward to it. I'm not especially bullish on fiat, especially the USD which is slowly loosing its reserve currency status, so even with the yield I'd rather have Bitcoins. But being able to put a bit of money into commodities which I think will rise in value and get a yield on top of that is quite exciting to me.

84
At some point I would like to buy the oil asset. Would these additional assets have a dividend structure like BitUSD?
you would get a yield ... no dividend ..

I think that's what I meant, just used the wrong word. I'll definitely be interested in buying / trading this then. Perhaps gold too. Thanks.

85
At some point I would like to buy the oil asset. Would these additional assets have a dividend structure like BitUSD?

86
General Discussion / Re: I think Delegates Need to Do This
« on: August 27, 2014, 05:33:55 pm »
I didn't mean to suggest you were a super rich elite who is sitting on your arses doing nothing, so I'm sorry if that's how it came across. I just saw someone else post that delegates were making something like $125 per month before BitAsset trading even started. Also if delegates are keeping all the money and not spending it on doing things to help Bitshares, then I don't think many people will choose to get involved in a system like that over something which shares the money out to everyone who has coins (ala NXT) or anyone who sets up a node (ala Crypti), because if its a choice between me having money and someone else having money, and everything else is equal, I'm always going to choose to have the money myself.

Yeah, you are who I thought you were.

Bitshares does share the money out to everyone.  As the Bitshares supply lowers, your % of the total outstanding shares increases.  Check the daily burn stat.

Sorry, who do you think I am?

Also I am aware how it works, and I have looked through the delegates to see the payrates, which I think average out at around 80%.

87
General Discussion / Re: I think Delegates Need to Do This
« on: August 27, 2014, 05:13:15 pm »
I liked  the point BM made in another post  that you can buy BitUSD  cheap and sell  it  cheap.  For me this means when I  take into consideration how much I paid for  it, selling it at a similar discount is not so  bad!

Also, as a delegate I am operating at a loss but hope to break even soon.  Partly because i am probably using a too high end server  but I'd rather do  that then miss blocks!  I don't  think there are any wealthy elites yet from being a delegate.  Kinda hard work actually keeping up with the  releases  and not missing blocks.

Yes, you can buy it cheap and then sell it cheap but still for a profit. But there is still an inequality of opportunities which is causing the price inequality:

If you have BTSX and you want to bet on BTSX going up then you only have one option: Short a BitAsset.

If you have BTSX and you want to bet on BTSX going down, then you don't just have the one option of buying BitUSD, you can also sell for BTC - which for many people will be a better option.

Because of this the price of BitUSD will not reach parity with USD, which is not good for the success of Bitshares.

I didn't mean to suggest you were a super rich elite who is sitting on your arses doing nothing, so I'm sorry if that's how it came across. I just saw someone else post that delegates were making something like $125 per month before BitAsset trading even started. Also if delegates are keeping all the money and not spending it on doing things to help Bitshares, then I don't think many people will choose to get involved in a system like that over something which shares the money out to everyone who has coins (ala NXT) or anyone who sets up a node (ala Crypti), because if its a choice between me having money and someone else having money, and everything else is equal, I'm always going to choose to have the money myself.

88
General Discussion / Re: I think Delegates Need to Do This
« on: August 27, 2014, 04:59:50 pm »
The discount is effectively defining the interest rate based upon the market expectation of 2 things:

1) how long it will take to reach parity
2) how far it is from parity today.

You can trade BitUSD vs BTSX so long as you factor in those two things into the BitUSD price.

You can, but why would you?

89
General Discussion / I think Delegates Need to Do This
« on: August 27, 2014, 04:45:08 pm »
I have come to the conclusion that BitUSD and other asset will not reach parity with the underlying asset they are supposed to be pegged to for a very long time.

There are two main reasons for this; the first is because most of the people trading on Bitshares are big Bitshares fans who are overly bullish on BTSX. The second is because there is no good reason to buy BitUSD at the moment.

Let me put it another way - if you think that the price of BTSX is going to go up, you are incentivized to short USD. If you think the price of BTSX is going to go down then there is no reason to buy BitUSD instead of just selling BTSX for BTC or something else.

Arbitrage doesn't work, because performing arbitrage is a bet that the market will return to the peg, but if these bets themselves are the only reason for this to happen, then its a foolish bet.

At the moment there is demand for shorts, but no demand for buying BitAssets. Perhaps the 5% would change this, otherwise the only thing would be mass adoption of BitUSD for paying for things, which probably isn't going to happen until after the peg is proven so isn't much help in this regard.

If the 5% thing is coming along soon then perhaps this post is irrelevant, but until then I think delegates need to step up to the plate and start buying BitUSD. Its my understanding that delegates are earning quite well now, but I haven't seen what they are spending this money on to support Bitshares, which is supposed to be what they do rather than just keeping all the pay for themselves.

Please - calling all delegates - step up to the plate and bet on the market peg working by spending part of your pay on BitUSD whenever it is more than perhaps 1-2% below the value of USD, because you are probably the only ones with the resources and motivation to do it.

90
There is no incentive to buy BitUSD. If you think the price of BTSX is going to go down you are better off selling into BTC or real USD.

Here is what I think will happen:

People are using shorts to bet big that BTSX will go up in price. They are idiots, because by doing so they are breaking the market peg (or at least making it very innacurate). As a result of this the price of BTSX will innevitably go down, because it appears to outside observers that it isn't working very well, and BitAssets are pretty much the whole story in terms of getting new people interested at in Bitshares at the moment. The shorts will eventually get that the price of BTSX is in decline, or the system will force their hand with margin calls. BitUSD will reach parity with USD, and stupid bulls will take this as a reason to bet big again and break it again.

This will keep happening over and over, and the price of BTSX will keep going down, until all the stupid people have lost all their money. That could take a very long time.


Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8