3421
General Discussion / Re: Welcome to TheDex.org
« on: January 08, 2016, 11:51:55 pm »
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
3422
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Details for Proposal 1.10.48
« on: January 08, 2016, 11:32:49 pm »
@xeroc as alt mentioned in the discussion thread, the amounts are incorrect.
Pull request submitted to github, please check.
//Update:
I've proposed a new proposal:
http://cryptofresh.com/p/1.10.49
Source code:
https://github.com/abitmore/python-graphenelib/blob/cb3539a2e5f8913e7bdb9c7d8b02228feffbaf75/scripts/witness-claim-accumulated-fees/main.py
Pull request submitted to github, please check.
//Update:
I've proposed a new proposal:
http://cryptofresh.com/p/1.10.49
Source code:
https://github.com/abitmore/python-graphenelib/blob/cb3539a2e5f8913e7bdb9c7d8b02228feffbaf75/scripts/witness-claim-accumulated-fees/main.py
3423
General Discussion / Re: [POLL] Possible committee actions to help with liquidity
« on: January 08, 2016, 11:05:18 pm »//UpdateThe poll at the top of this thread shows people are broadly in favour of selling the bitasset trade fees that have been accumulated.how many people found the amount in this proposol is not correct?
yet only @mindphlux @dele-puppy and @BunkerChain Labs have approved it: http://cryptofresh.com/p/1.10.48
Could @baozi @bitcrab @bitcube also approve this action please.
Confirmed.
I've submitted a pull request which contains a fix to the script.
We need to propose a new proposal.
//Original post
Thanks for mention this. I checked and found that at least "asset_id" of "fee"s are strange. @xeroc ?
Code: [Select]
"fee": {
"amount": 668,
"asset_id": "1.3.120"
},
Proposed operation for claiming EUR fees:
Code: [Select]
{
"fee": {
"amount": 668,
"asset_id": "1.3.120"
},
"issuer": "1.2.0",
"amount_to_claim": {
"amount": 8899500,
"asset_id": "1.3.120"
},
"extensions": []
}
Available EUR fees (less than the amount above):
Code: [Select]
[{
"id": "2.3.120",
"current_supply": 9223814,
"confidential_supply": 0,
"accumulated_fees": 102449,
"fee_pool": 3234216787
}
]
3424
General Discussion / Re: I suggest privated BTS
« on: January 08, 2016, 08:51:05 am »
I think technically the committee can already do this NOW. It's possible to propose a transfer from the committee account to another account, then vote for it, so technically the one who can vote in most committee members is able to transfer fund to her own account. So how about voting apathy?
3425
General Discussion / Re: OPENPOS :: Smartcoins Point Of Sale (POS) & BitShares Wallet for Android/iPhone
« on: January 08, 2016, 08:30:28 am »
Some suggestions from Chinese community:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20919.msg270858.html#msg270858
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20919.msg270858.html#msg270858
3426
General Discussion / Re: exchange preparing for voting
« on: January 08, 2016, 05:53:35 am »
It's a good signal imo.
People deposit to exchanges means that they agree the exchanges to vote as their proxy. No difference to set a proxy from the client.
People deposit to exchanges means that they agree the exchanges to vote as their proxy. No difference to set a proxy from the client.
3427
General Discussion / Re: btsbots reborn
« on: January 08, 2016, 03:23:04 am »A little off-topic, but I suggest restart that project and integrate it inside Graphene-ui as a bridge/gateway service, on the "deposit/withdraw" page, just like what blocktrade.us does now. (Already mentioned in the Chinese discuss board)no, BTSBOTS.EXCH is from BTSV0.9, it's for an exchange project, paused now ....Maybe this UIA: BTSBOTS.EXCH.yes, I have plan to add EUR next step, I'll increase fund to exchange.btsbots after more test.btsbots have withstood the test of today
exchange.btsbots keep provid liquility at market BTS:CNY, BTS:TCNY, BTS:BOTSCNY, BTS:USD
Any chance we can get the EUR market moving too? The POS systems are going to need it by March (release).
Do you have a UIA or something that I can invest in to help support your project? Getting the Smartcoins as liquid as possible is very important to us, this will help to ensure the success of the POS systems rollout in March.
no UIA for the trade bot service from btsbots, or mm bot from exchange.btsbots until now
if you are interesting, I encourage you run a mm bot yourself
you can adjust the parameter for the mm bot yourself, and it decide whether you are profitable
//Update: at least people can trade PLS via btsbots, no other bridge/gateway is doing this.
3428
General Discussion / Re: I suggest privated BTS
« on: January 08, 2016, 03:16:29 am »
What a f**k good point
3429
中文 (Chinese) / 今天从Telegram群看到的一些消息
« on: January 08, 2016, 03:02:00 am »
一些消息，比较八卦，供参考。
ccedk大概从下星期开始推广法币网关，包含各种主流币种，充提手续费2-3%
mindphlux认为这个手续费太高
（注：个人推测bts2的高费率是ccedk主导出来的）
ccedk的宣传文章的德语版和意大利语版是论坛的 Chris4210X 帮忙翻译的（收费10000bts），结果被发现是机器翻译的
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,18623.msg239291.html#msg239291
（注： Chris4210X 就是现在正在推广 OPENPOS 和新版手机钱包的那位）
fav最近没有推广bts了，因为赚不到钱，统计数据显示每个被推荐人贡献了$0.5
ccedk大概从下星期开始推广法币网关，包含各种主流币种，充提手续费2-3%
mindphlux认为这个手续费太高
（注：个人推测bts2的高费率是ccedk主导出来的）
ccedk的宣传文章的德语版和意大利语版是论坛的 Chris4210X 帮忙翻译的（收费10000bts），结果被发现是机器翻译的
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,18623.msg239291.html#msg239291
（注： Chris4210X 就是现在正在推广 OPENPOS 和新版手机钱包的那位）
fav最近没有推广bts了，因为赚不到钱，统计数据显示每个被推荐人贡献了$0.5
3430
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: January 07, 2016, 06:49:21 pm »If you're right, and the Poloniex sales happened after the BlockTrades sales, then either someone was watching the BlockTrades account and sold when they saw a big sale to us (possibly in some automated fashion which seems slightly improbable to me, but not impossible), or else the bts-qq123-bts account owner also had an existing bts balance on Poloniex and just sold there as well. I guess the scenario where it's one person with two accounts is the most probable one.This makes sense.
Yes there is a smaller drop on Yunbi.
The idea that margin trading contributed to the severity of the drop seems reasonable to me also, given the drop mainly seemed to happen on poloniex and not the chinese exchanges.
Since Btc38 temporarily suspended withdraw/deposit due to the urgent fix or some other reason, there is a much smaller drop.
3431
中文 (Chinese) / Re: BTSBOTS 重新启动了
« on: January 07, 2016, 06:00:06 pm »
测试完之后，建议在“充值/提现”那里加一页，就像巨蟹的那样，或者直接加在巨蟹那页里面，提供所有 btsbots 支持的币种之间的直接兑换服务。
3432
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Ruby on Rails developer; for hire
« on: January 07, 2016, 03:37:23 pm »
Welcome.
If I remember, CryptoFresh.com is written in Ruby?
Any other Ruby projects here?
//Edit:
We do need front-end developers. Need skills withActivejs ReactJs.
If I remember, CryptoFresh.com is written in Ruby?
Any other Ruby projects here?
//Edit:
We do need front-end developers. Need skills with
3433
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: January 07, 2016, 03:10:18 pm »
I guess that the 2nd dump happened at arround 6:15 GMT is made by Baozou, who operates dacx.com.
Quote
yun-bts sent 5,000,000 BTS to poloniexwallet
block 2,445,507 - 8 hours ago - 32 BTS
yun-bts sent 5,000,000 BTS to poloniexwallet
block 2,445,032 - 8 hours ago - 32 BTS
yun-bts sent 4,170,000 BTS to poloniexwallet
block 2,444,122 - 9 hours ago - 32 BTS
yun-bts sent 2,686,000 BTS to poloniexwallet
block 2,443,621 - 10 hours ago - 32 BTS
yun-bts sent 1,600,000 BTS to poloniexwallet
block 2,443,314 - 10 hours ago - 32 BTS
Quote
baozou sent 10,540,000 BTS to yun-bts
block 2,291,564 - 5 days ago - 32 BTS
baozou sent 8,000,000 BTS to yun-bts
block 2,291,467 - 5 days ago - 32 BTS
3434
General Discussion / Re: The Benefits of Proof of Work [BLOG POST]
« on: January 07, 2016, 03:03:08 pm »So it explains that some people don't trust that disclaimer, or the writer.As my observation, the crowd in China never trust bm now ,
I basically oppose this ,
It is thing make me feel distressed,
The post made it very clear up front that these thoughts have nothing to do with BitShares.
They are just concepts put out there for discussion and as a new way to talk with POW fans about what's really important in blockchain security algorithms. An attempt to advance the thinking in the industry.
So how can this cause opposition, distrust and distress?
3435
General Discussion / Re: btsbots reborn
« on: January 07, 2016, 02:47:36 pm »Maybe this UIA: BTSBOTS.EXCH.yes, I have plan to add EUR next step, I'll increase fund to exchange.btsbots after more test.btsbots have withstood the test of today
exchange.btsbots keep provid liquility at market BTS:CNY, BTS:TCNY, BTS:BOTSCNY, BTS:USD
Any chance we can get the EUR market moving too? The POS systems are going to need it by March (release).
Do you have a UIA or something that I can invest in to help support your project? Getting the Smartcoins as liquid as possible is very important to us, this will help to ensure the success of the POS systems rollout in March.
