Technically, the refund400k is

Code: [Select]

>>> get_object 1.14.0
get_object 1.14.0
[{
    "id": "1.14.0",
    "worker_account": "1.2.90742",
    "work_begin_date": "2015-10-20T17:30:00",
    "work_end_date": "2035-12-31T00:00:00",
    "daily_pay": "40000000000",
    "worker": [
      0,{
        "total_burned": "1742631985322"
      }
    ],
    "vote_for": "2:65",
    "vote_against": "2:66",
    "total_votes_for": "21716971826670",
    "total_votes_against": "7192913280182",
    "name": "refund400k",
    "url": ""
  }
]
Looks like the fund to this worker is "burned".

Technically, the refund400k is
>>> get_object 1.14.0
get_object 1.14.0
[{
    "id": "1.14.0",
    "worker_account": "1.2.90742",
    "work_begin_date": "2015-10-20T17:30:00",
    "work_end_date": "2035-12-31T00:00:00",
    "daily_pay": "40000000000",
    "worker": [
      0,{
        "total_burned": "1742631985322"
      }
    ],
    "vote_for": "2:65",
    "vote_against": "2:66",
    "total_votes_for": "21716971826670",
    "total_votes_against": "7192913280182",
    "name": "refund400k",
    "url": ""
  }
]
Looks like the fund to this worker is "burned". Is init0 able to change the destination of the funds in the future?

//Update:
Since this thread has been dig out recently, I'm updating this message.

The refund400k worker IS a refund worker, although it has a "total_burned" data field. init0 is unable to change the type of worker or destination of the funds.

More info in this thread: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20793.0.html , quoted below:

Those that have an initializer of "0" are refund, those with "2" are burn.
An initializer of "1" would be a regular worker with payout to the creator.

Also see
* http://docs.bitshares.eu/bitshares/user/worker.html
* https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=22486.0

Quote from: roadscape on December 19, 2015, 04:06:43 am

The memo key for that account is BTS1111111111111111111111111111111114T1Anm, and it appears to be the same for a few others I checked. I believe this means that it's impossible for anyone to read the memos.

Have you sent memos to collateral-holder accounts before?
Can you leave the memo blank as a workaround?

Oh, hmmmm, that's interesting. I had just assumed this was a completely normal account with a custom name. Why would it have an invalid memo key?

Interesting. Maybe something wrong with the genesis file?

So just this little item remains a mystery for me:
"Price per KByte Transaction Size" - when does it apply?

http://cryptofresh.com/fees

For example if you transfer or issue some assets with memo it will apply. Imho it's rather annoying, since most transfers are with memos, as a result fees are always different and fractional. We'd better set a "free" memo size which charges no extra per KBytes fee.

I have a couple of questions regarding transfer fees for UIAs (and private MPAs):

(1) A newly created UIA has 2.5k BTS in its fee pool. I know I can easily add funds to the fee pool but who funded the initial 2.5k BTS?

Half of the creation fee.

(2) Is it true that 100% of the transfer fees on UIAs (and private MPAs) belong the issuer? (as they show as Unclaimed Issuer Income in the GUI)

No when fees are paid in UIA, some BTS (amount is defined by the fee schedule) are deducted from fee pool and paid to the network/referral program, and UIA paid to the issuer. Except the % market fee (by now) which goes to the issuer directly.

(3) If (2) is true, does it mean that:
(a) the BitShares network alows to transfer UIAs (and private MPAs) back and forth between BitShares accounts without getting any revenue for this service?
(b) transfer fees for UIAs (and private MPAs) are exempt from the referral program?
(c) the issuer of UIA (and private MPA) can set the transfer fee on their asset to any arbitrary level (or even zero) by adjusting the Core Exchange Rate?

(4) What is the meaning of "Price per KByte Transaction Size" listed in /explorer/fees?

@jakub How about the STEALTH work proposal (1.14.18)? It seems to have already been approved.

Stealth supply is now little bit more than 10,000 BTS. That's very clear indicator that most people aren't willing to use the text based client. You might be able to do that but Bitshares is not only for you – are you even using this particular feature?

If we want to grow, we need more users. If we want more users, we need better GUI.

Better GUI doesn't mean to change the underlying protocol.