Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - abit

Pages: 1 ... 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 [278] 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 ... 309
4156
中文 (Chinese) / 【建议】关于完善官方wiki的建议
« on: March 19, 2015, 01:57:08 am »
官方wiki,应该包含系统的各方面内容,特别是非技术内容,方便系统外的人更快了解系统,参与进来。
比如:
* 出块及DPOS投票机制
* 系统股权分配及释放规则
* MPA发行机制
* UIA发行机制及运作细节
* 市场匹配规则细节
* 系统内各项收费规则

现在的wiki只有英文版?并且很多内容很久没更新了,比较过时。
其实论坛有过很多讨论,应该集中沉淀下来。

由于缺乏具体标准(软件开发中所谓需求规格说明)
* 已经实现的功能,无法查验是否实现正确。
* 还没有实现、准备做的功能,做的时候没有规则可以参考,做出来也不知道对不对

建议【服务组】或者【@cn-members】组织一下,
* 整理需要完善的条目/目录清单
* 搞个激励机制,比如发工资或者悬赏,激励社区提交内容,由核心开发团队或者专门的审查组进行初步审查,内容发布后大家可以一起讨论、完善。

行文仓促,如有疏漏请见谅。

4157
Notified.
I think the dividend feature is on milestone 0.8 https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/issues/1430

4158
General Discussion / Re: Are people really this ignorant of BitUSD?
« on: March 17, 2015, 08:54:42 am »
  • Unreliable cold wallets, etc. (even though xeroc has put together a nice guide, last time I tried it with 2 BitUSD, it got lost, so I would not trust it, and you shouldn't either)
  • TITAN is more hassle than it's worth it - would've been nice as an "optional" feature. Transactions details got lost in the process.
Agreed ... and the coldstorage mess is basically the fault of TITAN.
But I will rewrite that howto as we now have the option to send funds to an
address! .. Also I am currently writing a offline-signing tool in python ..
Though it is also still untested :( ..

Please give me some time, I am working on this in my spare time and my TODO list
is endless :(
I dunno if 'send funds to an address' is a good option for cold storage.. after transferred fund to an address you cannot transfer it out until you take the client online, else you'll get 'insufficient fund' error. Workaround: copy the 'chain' folder from an online wallet to the offline wallet then the fund will be usable, but it also works with registered accounts.
Multi-sig is great for cold storage imho. Use an offline wallet for signing only.

  • No cool use cases and example implementations - e.g. Escrow. Most of the
    code out there is written with Bitcoin script in mind. BTS should have done one
    of these: 1) Implement Bitcoin script, so that existing engines can work. 2)
    Implement Ethereum and generate some noise in the process. 3) Implement its own
    form of scripting.
IMHO it's an advantage to not use Script because you cannot mess up your funds
and read your transaction in JSON/plaintext not having to interpret the stack
ops in the correct order!
Also, the client (and delegages) do not have to "interpret" Script, which makes
it MUCH faster which we need for 10k tps.
Afaik escrow works nearly perfectly. Just need someone to put it in use.

4159
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Developer delegate: dev.bitsharesblocks
« on: March 17, 2015, 08:06:30 am »
Hey SVK,

Is there a way to get amount of change for each asset based on today? I would like to get the OPEN of today.. like the data on the chart for each asset.. how do I get that?

Thanks

There is a command 'blockchain_market_price_history' in console (buggy in 0.6.x, will fix in 0.7).
Dunno if svk provides a wrapper though.

4160
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Developer delegate: dev.bitsharesblocks
« on: March 17, 2015, 08:03:46 am »
@svk Would you like to identify 'canceling an order' from 'placing an order'? It could be done by checking the sign of amount.

4161
中文 (Chinese) / Re: btsbots交易平台增加功能
« on: March 17, 2015, 04:49:49 am »
建议竞价交易价格多显示1位小数。现在和时代一样,太坑了。

专业的外汇交易平台报价都是4+位有效位数的。

4162
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 质疑时代的293万补偿
« on: March 16, 2015, 03:39:37 am »
忘记了。反正不关我的事。

4163
General Discussion / Re: How to move your account to another wallet?
« on: March 16, 2015, 03:28:55 am »

Step 2 : export all of the private keys of each account .
go to Advanced option  under the menu of account names , select the tab of "Console" ,  type the following instructions and hit Enter on keyboard
wallet_dump_private_key rabbit

then you'll get a long address , copy and save it , that's the private key for "rabbit" . Assuming it's XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.
A good tutorial.
Just a remind, we need to use wallet_dump_account_private_key instead of wallet_dump_private_key with client version 0.6.x.

BTW it's best if someone could update the wiki and post a link here, rather than reply in every posts.

4164
General Discussion / Re: What going on?
« on: March 16, 2015, 03:03:55 am »
2) Music will be traded on the Bitshares Exchange

How will this work :o
As a UIA, maybe.

4165
General Discussion / Re: What going on?
« on: March 16, 2015, 02:59:46 am »
I've seen multiple updates from the core developers in different threads since the last week .
Need I dig that up ?

This one , placed a bounty for integration with certain lib for FC .
It could enhance the performance for the wallet .
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=14745.msg191225

This one , bytemaster detailed his latest effort on the basic infrastructure of the BitShares system , namely FC lib .
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=14854.msg192350#msg192350

This one , bytemaster mentioned he'll address a bug related to the market .
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=14942.msg193453#msg193453

This one , major upgrade for the webwallet (brain wallet) , you can now easily backup and restore brain wallet on the web site .
It's also fully translated into Chinese , so it'll be good for Chinese promotion .
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=14529.0
wallet.bitshares.org

Vikram said the enhanced user issued asset function will first go into Devshares , and need help to test once it does .
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=11921.msg192909#msg192909

Also judging from Github commits , the developers are working hard , no matter they posted or not .
But 0.7.0 milestone is a pretty heavy duty , it contains many function needed by gateways and a overall fix for many issues that dated back a long time ago .
So it took longer than expected . Some of the issues there contains dozens of small issue , so it looks like it's just 2 left , but it still takes time .

I've seen multiple updates from the core developers in different threads since the last week .
Need I dig that up ?

This one , placed a bounty for integration with certain lib for FC .
It could enhance the performance for the wallet .
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=14745.msg191225

This one , bytemaster detailed his latest effort on the basic infrastructure of the BitShares system , namely FC lib .
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=14854.msg192350#msg192350

This one , bytemaster mentioned he'll address a bug related to the market .
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=14942.msg193453#msg193453

This one , major upgrade for the webwallet (brain wallet) , you can now easily backup and restore brain wallet on the web site .
It's also fully translated into Chinese , so it'll be good for Chinese promotion .
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=14529.0
wallet.bitshares.org

Vikram said the enhanced user issued asset function will first go into Devshares , and need help to test once it does .
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=11921.msg192909#msg192909

Also judging from Github commits , the developers are working hard , no matter they posted or not .
But 0.7.0 milestone is a pretty heavy duty , it contains many function needed by gateways and a overall fix for many issues that dated back a long time ago .
So it took longer than expected . Some of the issues there contains dozens of small issue , so it looks like it's just 2 left , but it still takes time .


appears to be not communication and updates
yep..... appears to be is the right word , because there are updates and actual progress on coding instead of mentioning the same progress over and over again with different people .

Then again , don't base your investment on the progress of development . The price would still be the same even if 1.0 version comes out tomorrow , or 1.0 comes 6 months later . If it's a bad time to buy economically , don't buy it even the development progress is good . If you have a feeling that the price is good , just buy it even you think the wallet is buggy . It didn't really matter , the price is not supported by the wallet itself .
Good job. Thanks for your hard work.

4166
Trying to craft a market_batch_update command with many cover orders results in same error. Have to cover the shorts one by one and cost a lot more fees.

4167
Technical Support / Re: Need help in getting account registered
« on: March 16, 2015, 02:12:14 am »
fbs-delegate2
BTS6hrrcGSJzF2uGAPY9ajmnSBAkezF93pemsyohKuvyf4Nam7CZQ

fbs-delegate3
BTS7oMcggTfktMeHTRwG9KMwXo3vsunbte1AFA8kvbfLobLBTfiWE


Could use some help in getting these accounts registered.
The faucets aren't working
You may need to buy some bts first. Registration fee for a 100% delegate is around 60k BTS.

Mind linking me to a resource where i can read up on this?

https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/releases/tag/bts%2F0.4.24
Quote
* Delegates are issued up to 50 BTS per block produced
...
* * Delegate registration costs 2 full weeks of income

4169
General Discussion / Re: Redownloading whole blockchain after crash.
« on: March 15, 2015, 01:12:05 pm »
Try click 'continue' rather than 'reset' after a crash.

Make a backup of the 'chain' folder is OK. The 'wallet' folder is important, always make a backup before overwrite it.

4170
General Discussion / Re: how to cover short order with BTS to pay fee?
« on: March 15, 2015, 01:08:30 pm »
Use the console.

Pages: 1 ... 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 [278] 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 ... 309