Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - voldemort628

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1
General Discussion / Re: Now is the perfect time to implement sweeping transparency measures.
« on: October 22, 2014, 07:34:00 am »
Quote from: bytemaster on October 22, 2014, 03:36:08 am
Quote from: Rune on October 22, 2014, 03:30:36 am
Quote from: Mysto on October 22, 2014, 03:28:49 am
Quote from: Rune on October 22, 2014, 03:08:55 am
I propose that they are all used to buy up BTSX, and then burned.
Why? I can think of a million ways these funds can be used. Since BTS is going to have DCI I don't see how this will be of any use to the shareholders.

Burning them means distributing them equally to all shareholders. Once funds are needed for something new in the future, they are simply diluted into existance by elected delegates. There is no reason to take the risk of having an external entity holding the funds for us.

The plan has always been to move all employees to delegates and phase out I3.
If by the time we successfully achieve that and the ags donation fund still hasnt run out, what will be done with the left over money?
Btw when do u see we can achieve that?

2
General Discussion / Re: drltc is joining the BitShares team
« on: October 22, 2014, 07:30:27 am »
So can we get a short intro of the new members' real life profile? :D
 Edit: or point me to it if i miss it

3
General Discussion / Re: What does a fair allocation of Bitshares to BTSX/AGS/PTS holders look like?
« on: October 22, 2014, 07:05:57 am »
So i can claim my stake in the new BTS using my claimed BTSX, AGS (which were already used to claim btsx and dns) , and the newly claimed DNS right?

4
General Discussion / Re: Proposal to Resolve a Million Issues at Once
« on: October 19, 2014, 01:02:33 pm »
Quote from: pgbit on October 19, 2014, 12:59:04 pm
>
My Proposal:
...
4) Add stake holder approved dilution without limit to BitShares X.

"Without limit"? - seems like this would lead to devaluation down the line. Did you mean a 20% dilution only to accommodate AGS and PTS?

any decision to up the total supply cap need to pass a vote by stakeholders. so worry not, stakeholders *will* (hopefully and rationally) decide what's best for all.

5
General Discussion / Re: Proposal to Resolve a Million Issues at Once
« on: October 19, 2014, 04:08:25 am »
Quote from: bytemaster on October 19, 2014, 04:04:15 am
Quote from: voldemort628 on October 19, 2014, 04:00:16 am
I dont like the part with " unlimited dilution" :/

Stakeholder approved dilution... I say this because the "hard rules" will force us into "consensus busting problems" in the future. 

I am working on ideas for better control over the voting process for "hard forks"....
In that case, i hope we can get a DAC in which stakeholders get to vote on the amount of "additional shares issuance" and " share buyback".

The point here is you should assure stakeholders that any decision made to further dilute BTS will "only" benefit the DAC as a whole.

6
General Discussion / Re: Proposal to Resolve a Million Issues at Once
« on: October 19, 2014, 04:00:16 am »
I dont like the part with " unlimited dilution" :/

7
Technical Support / Re: !!! Stupid Questions Thread !!!
« on: October 11, 2014, 02:30:03 am »
I did. So thats the problem?

8
Technical Support / Re: !!! Stupid Questions Thread !!!
« on: October 11, 2014, 02:14:12 am »
When i was trying to register an account i got an error message saying something about parent account authority required to regiater child acc.
What should i do?
 And why that happened?

9
BitShares AGS / Re: Is it too late to buy AGS?
« on: September 14, 2014, 01:46:05 am »
However you still can get pts which has a similar function :D for more info go to bitshares.org

10
BitShares AGS / Re: Is it too late to buy AGS?
« on: September 14, 2014, 01:44:59 am »
The donation period has long ended. It lasted for around six months until july this year.

11
General Discussion / Re: BTSX Valuation based upon standard P/E ratio of 20.
« on: September 12, 2014, 11:54:57 am »
How much do u think is "big enough"? :))

12
General Discussion / Re: BTSX Valuation based upon standard P/E ratio of 20.
« on: September 12, 2014, 12:50:19 am »
If it catches on, 2M per month in net in flow of capital is the worst case scenario imho.

13
General Discussion / Re: BitShares X Product Roadmap - AGS/PTS Snapshots and More!
« on: September 11, 2014, 10:55:19 am »
i hope it is still true that Bitshares X is the protoDAC of the exchange & bank family :)
Can Stan confirm this point?

14
General Discussion / Re: BTSX Valuation based upon standard P/E ratio of 20.
« on: September 10, 2014, 11:09:06 pm »
Well, your friend has some valid points there but i guess he is not so familiar with the crypto industry(?). Because apparently bitshares is the first of its kind in the industry, it's meant to improve on bitcoin's weaknesses, so basically we cant use p/e pf btc(as a company) to do valuation for bitshares.

I think a conservative p/e from a "similar" industry ( ie banking in real world) would do for an estimation of our valuation analysis. :)

15
General Discussion / Re: Market Report
« on: September 10, 2014, 07:58:35 am »
I support the view that Cob should make the fundraising as close (and fair) to AGS style as possible. Because investors normally want to get an exact number (in case of a fundraising) or at least a good guess (in case of a donation i.e ags) of how much they are gonna get in return for the amount put in.

Anyway, eagerly waiting for official ann.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 23 queries.