Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - 麥可貓

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 18
16
General Discussion / Re: What bitshares should learn from steem
« on: July 10, 2016, 04:13:57 pm »
Bitshares had its prime time too. As I can recall, it passed ripple and became the no.2 highest market cap. To take a long story short, what happened then caused bitshares fell to the market cap of today. I couldn't tell if the same thing will happen to steem, but I strongly feel that we should keep going on the current route, and make bitshares more appealing in more practical use cases, and never look back.

17

No complex software is involved, the key secret is how BitoEX persuade Famiymart to do so.

Let the competition do the persuasion. Over 50K businesses use the Odoo software, businesses like Cox Communications for example (they have millions of customers). Instead of trying to convince 1 corporation, I would rather provide options for 50K hungry businesses all at once, some whom of which are competing with each other. Hence, we kill 50K birds with 1 stone (in a sense).

1. If blockchain technology, or at least bitcoin, has become a self-evident phenomena, then yes companies would be persuaded naturally. If it is still the frontier of innovation, then as I know a commercial expert is the key to bridge two worlds.
2. Convicing 1 corporation with 2986 branches (aka Familymart) is definitely better than convicing 50k corporations in many ways. You cannot have the man power to convince 50k corporations, hence it is not like kill 50k birds with one stone, it is actually sit and wait 50k birds die naturally.
3. A good example is the bts cart. As I can recall, it has been done for a long time. Look how many web shops are using it?

18
I was re-directed here by bitacer (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20780.0.html). Sorry in advance that  don't have a lot casual time now, so I make my point as concise as possible:

1. cell phone wallet is definitely worth doing. I still remember there was a project called limewallet that claimed to do so, but I cannot find any progress now
2. Speaking of POS, lets make this clear logically: "a POS for bts" does not equal to "commercial adoption of bts", but what we actually want is the later one, isn't it?
3. Is a POS for bts the key for stores to accept bts? Not actually. The key is a good commercial team to persuade corporations to do so.
4. Is a POS for bts necessary for stores to accept bts? Not actually. Check this out if you have not seen it:
https://medium.com/@digital654321/familymart-now-accpets-bitoex-s-bitcoin-wallet-to-buy-goods-b85c9bac78f2#.djc1n1g0g
a bitcoin exchange BitoEX teamed up with familymart to aceept bitcoin to buy goods by using the small machine 'famiport'. They just added a button for this next to buttons for buying game points or other coupons. No complex software is involved, the key secret is how BitoEX persuade Famiymart to do so.

Once again, Itruely appreciate the effort to make a cell phone wallet for bts, but as to the other one,  it is actually a commercial problem, not a programming problem.

19
General Discussion / Some opinion about 'Winter Storm Warning #1'
« on: December 26, 2015, 06:03:32 pm »
1. great aims, makes you imagine if someday stores can include such POS and people can buy goods using cell phone wallet.
2. but think twice, what they actually offer is just the software to do so, and does not include any plans to persuade stores to use it.
3. Are softwares the key to realize this goal? No, just like carts using bts has been written for a long time, still almost no one is using it.
4. To sum up, the keys to enable people purchasing goods using cryptos at stores in your neighborhood are a) find the correct target that would like to try this with minimal efforts and costs and b) a correct strategy to avoid potential legal issue in some countries
5. Is what I am talking about possible? Yes, check this out if you have not read this:
https://medium.com/@digital654321/familymart-now-accpets-bitoex-s-bitcoin-wallet-to-buy-goods-b85c9bac78f2#.j0w9fw1na

In brief, a small Taiwan bitcoin exchange BitoEX has cooperated with Familymart convinience store to buy goods at every Familymart in your neighborhood in Taiwan. And the way they doing it, using bitcoin to buy coupons that you use to exchange into goods, avoids potential legal problems. All BitoEX has to do is to write is a small software for the small computer (aka Famiport) used in every Familymart. Simple enough for the developer team and the store. Once again, the key thing is the business strategy, not any fancy program.

20
Technical Support / How to build light_client from source?
« on: November 23, 2015, 09:13:38 am »
I tried the following steps:

Code: [Select]
git clone https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2
cd bitshares-2
VER=`git tag | tail -n1` && git checkout $VER
git submodule update --init --recursive
cmake  -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug -DBUILD_QT_GUI=ON  ./CMakeLists.txt
make

which succesfully finished ($? = 0)
but did not give me light_client

and i found that "add_subdirectory(light_client)" in CMakeLists.txt under programs folder was commented out
so I added it back, compiled again,
but it failed with the following message:
Code: [Select]
/data2/local/src/bitshares-2/programs/light_client/ChainDataModel.cpp:50:17: error: no member named 'subscribe_to_objects' in 'fc::vtable<graphene::app::database_api, fc::identity_member>'
      m_db_api->subscribe_to_objects([this](const variant& v) {
      ~~~~~~~~  ^
/data2/local/src/bitshares-2/programs/light_client/ChainDataModel.cpp:55:17: error: no member named 'subscribe_to_objects' in 'fc::vtable<graphene::app::database_api, fc::identity_member>'
      m_db_api->subscribe_to_objects([this](const variant& d) {
      ~~~~~~~~  ^
/data2/local/src/bitshares-2/programs/light_client/ChainDataModel.cpp:195:21: error: no matching function for call to object of type 'decltype(identity_member::functor((graphene::app::database_api *)nullptr,
      &graphene::app::database_api::get_full_accounts))' (aka 'function<std::map<std::basic_string<char>, graphene::app::full_account, std::less<std::basic_string<char> >, std::allocator<std::pair<const
      std::basic_string<char>, graphene::app::full_account> > > (const std::vector<std::basic_string<char>, std::allocator<std::basic_string<char> > > &, bool)>')
      auto result = m_db_api->get_full_accounts([this](const fc::variant& v) {
                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


any help please?

21
General Discussion / Re: Then, let's talk about Increasing Fees
« on: November 14, 2015, 06:35:04 am »
Whatever it will be,  the most important thing is to be a simple stupid one for consumers,  not an  all in one giant trash.
As for me,  the client performance of bts2.0 is good for me,  but it is really hard to use comparing with other exchanges,  like poloniex,  bitoex,  cryptosy etc.



Here's an excerpt from someone (I won't name them, but they're HUGE and hope they don't mind me posting this) that I respect in the cryptocurrency ecosystem ...

Quote
It's amazing how the most competitive, centralized space is the one that he [Dan] still is choosing to go after when the solutions offered by bitshares in any other market are revolutionary and not in need of improvement besides a real UI design.

Yeah,  the UI design is everything for consumers,  and it has to be real for consumers,  not programmers.  As for me,  the killer app for a currency is making payments (just like making calls for a phone),  and every works should take this as guiding princle, target use case,  not any other fancy profound idea in the programmers mind. Following this idea,  the killer app to realize payment should be on a phone,  ios and android.  You dont bring your laptop to 7-11 to buy a coke.

22
General Discussion / Re: Then, let's talk about Increasing Fees
« on: November 14, 2015, 06:01:30 am »
... the reasonable thing to do is to exame the system for what is actually done wrong

As soon as we can figure out what the system is, then we can examine it.

I have no clue what BitShares is at this point. When I first heard about it, it sounded like the greatest thing since nude pictures of Holly Peers on the internet.

Now, it kind of looks like a nude picture of Christine Lagarde, but my vision is sometimes bad ... kind of like BitShares'. ;)

Whatever it will be,  the most important thing is to be a simple stupid one for consumers,  not an  all in one giant trash.
As for me,  the client performance of bts2.0 is good for me,  but it is really hard to use comparing with other exchanges,  like poloniex,  bitoex,  cryptosy etc.

23
General Discussion / Re: Then, let's talk about Increasing Fees
« on: November 14, 2015, 05:46:36 am »
I think sarcasm is 90% lost in writing... 100% lost in translation. :(


oh sarcasm... sorry that I mistaken it as a serious thing,and forgot to bring my sense of humor.

24
General Discussion / Re: Then, let's talk about Increasing Fees
« on: November 14, 2015, 05:34:12 am »
This is stupid math as it is based on the premise that all market traders are idiots.  In fact,  increasing fee 1.5x will lower trading volume 10x,  finally the system lost more. You can still try if you dont believe in this,  but I can tell you it is irreversible,  people wont come back when you lower the fee afterwards.
If the BTS price is going down,  the reasonable thing to do is to exame the system for what is actually done wrong,  even if there were thousands of theories backing it. Not to mention that every CXO should ask himself about this question 10x more,  and take your financial lost as your responsibility.

25
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: MUSE Light client Release
« on: October 27, 2015, 09:20:23 am »
A problem under linux: the muse app icon is incorrect under linux (left, linux mint 17.2), while the bts icon is correct (right):



btw the muse icon under windows is corrent

26
有没有想过谣言是怎么传播的?

就是因为大家都是听别人说

我建议每个人都把二手传播的信息先加上一个问号, 包含我的翻译

去看看原文的帖子, 就算英文不好, 用翻译软件翻译, 也顺便学习

反之如果不想花功夫, 只想听别人说一两句下结论, 或者凭依两句道听涂说, 指点江山, 那只能说活该当韭菜

27
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 纪念已经死去的中国社区
« on: June 24, 2015, 03:06:46 am »
只会黑的人走的越快越好
只会抱怨的人也是一样

28
Technical Support / Re: Video Tutorials of using BitShares wallets
« on: June 23, 2015, 05:43:46 pm »
Here is the 2nd new video tutorial:
How to download bitshares client or build one in Ubuntu

29
Please feel free to brainstorm.

Since that this kind of ATM could have a receipt, why not consider having a receipt lottery?
I think receipt could further encourage people to use this ATM and go on ramp besides the burning mechanism built inside BitShares.
And different formula for receipt lottery could be tried: tiny prizes with lots of winners (and higher expectation to win), or large prizes with only a few winners.

30
I think smartcoin and smartchain is great and necessary, because it can get rid of the shadow of bitcoin.
When I see some crypto asset called bitXXX, I can't stop thinking about it is something originated from bitcoin.
Just like if there was one product called iXXX, it makes you to consider it as a Apple product.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 18