46
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
47
General Discussion / Re: Poloniex Deposit
« on: February 17, 2016, 09:36:23 pm »
I've got an email from Poloniex.
Quote
Hi Clayop,
Unfortunately the wallet is having problems keeping the sync, we are already working on it but we do not have an ETA as of now.
I am sorry for the inconvenience.
48
General Discussion / Re: [ATTENTION] STEALTH will come on 18th Feb?
« on: February 17, 2016, 07:00:09 pm »Shareholders can subscribe to this linkIMO this is naïve mind. Devs and witnesses can do that but normal users and business partners don't think a github tag is an announcement.
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2/subscription
To keep up-to-date
It's just a lazy manner I think. It only needs 10 min and user-friendly mind to write short announcements and newsletters.
It doesn't take 10 minutes.. a proper well authored document that is not torn apart for being unprofessional or having all kinds of mistakes takes hours.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,19040.30.html
49
General Discussion / Re: [ATTENTION] STEALTH will come on 18th Feb?
« on: February 17, 2016, 05:38:42 pm »Shareholders can subscribe to this linkIMO this is naïve mind. Devs and witnesses can do that but normal users and business partners don't think a github tag is an announcement.
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2/subscription
To keep up-to-date
It's just a lazy manner I think. It only needs 10 min and user-friendly mind to write short announcements and newsletters.
50
General Discussion / Re: BitShares 2.0.160216 Released
« on: February 17, 2016, 06:42:50 am »https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2/releases
Windows binaries will be posted shortly.
You should use here:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,7067.0.html
51
General Discussion / Re: Poloniex Deposit
« on: February 17, 2016, 05:50:56 am »
I'm having this problem again.
And FYI, they missed some deposited because of broken "get_account_history" API. I sent them a simple script to detect them.
And FYI, they missed some deposited because of broken "get_account_history" API. I sent them a simple script to detect them.
52
General Discussion / Re: [ATTENTION] STEALTH will come on 18th Feb?
« on: February 16, 2016, 09:26:53 pm »Sure devs are expected to do that since they are more into those matters and have more info than us, but if it's a problem that big - just letting them know there will be a fork - why not just tell them ourselves too? The community also needs to be proactive. Sure any issues during an update that might appear (ie 1.0 to 2.0 update) should have a closer look from the devs and provide some help if necessary.
However if the problem is just informing them why can't the community do it too? Yesterday I just went to Polo and told a mod who said he would pass the info to the rest of the crew, what's the problem with that? 2m and it's done.
Yeah I already noticed polo two days ago via ticket (it took 3 min :p) But it's a matter of organizing things and services. What if they asked you where's the announcement they can read? Go and read the whole script of hangout?
53
General Discussion / Re: [ATTENTION] STEALTH will come on 18th Feb?
« on: February 16, 2016, 09:02:24 pm »https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2/releases/tag/2.0.160216
I'm little sick of this kind of practice...
BM said the upgrade will be Thursday only in mumble. NO pre-announcement.
Theoretical post update Tuesday. NO announcement on forum or via email.
The devs should realize that Github notification is not an announcement. We need more formal and official one, to become a successful platform.
We are in the process of notifying exchanges and posting the update in the appropriate threads. We cannot broadcast on all channels at the same time. Also, it is helpful to have witnesses verify the code before we notify exchanges.
That makes sense. I maybe over sensitive, but we should notify all types of customers, not only exchanges, so that we need more specific channel IMHO.
54
General Discussion / Re: [ATTENTION] STEALTH will come on 18th Feb?
« on: February 16, 2016, 08:50:42 pm »
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2/releases/tag/2.0.160216
I'm little sick of this kind of practice...
BM said the upgrade will be Thursday only in mumble. NO pre-announcement.
Theoretical post update Tuesday. NO announcement on forum or via email.
The devs should realize that Github notification is not an announcement. We need more formal and official one, to become a successful platform.
I'm little sick of this kind of practice...
BM said the upgrade will be Thursday only in mumble. NO pre-announcement.
Theoretical post update Tuesday. NO announcement on forum or via email.
The devs should realize that Github notification is not an announcement. We need more formal and official one, to become a successful platform.
55
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Yunbi problem with Muse deposit
« on: February 16, 2016, 07:03:20 pm »
I recommend to stop using Yunbi, since they are having deposit problems (ETH also) now. Personally, I withdraw all of my fund from Yunbi.
56
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: February 16, 2016, 04:53:16 am »Temporarily = over 36 hours[emoji14]I always buy in when Localhost and BM dumps [emoji14] Then the price must go up for a short time . Nice trading signal .
Also when the polo deposit wallet is temporarily down. That way the devs cant send any there to dump.
57
General Discussion / Re: EASY FIX to improve user experience on DEX
« on: February 16, 2016, 03:19:01 am »It's a good idea, but I think having specialized exchange page is better, i.e. exchange.openledger.org, with pre-selected asset pairs (in this example, Openasset market and smartcoin market). If newbie want to buy bitshares, can we tell to him how to use wallet exchange in 1 min? No... we have to start with "what is IOU" first and how to find gateway and openassets and on and on... It's much easier to say, "go poloniex.com"
We have to be simple to sell our products.
I think both are important. Don't forget, although some specialized front ends are in the works, most will not appear immediately. And when they do appear, some will use the current wallet as is, but just re-skin it and host it on their domain.
OpenLedger is the best example. They have the most users and they use the default wallet. Maybe that will change. But in the meantime we need a quick solution for a better, more intuitive UI so we can gain and keep ACTIVE users, otherwise much of the efforts are wasted.
I think we should do this immediately. It wouldn't take a whole lot. @svk: do you have thoughts on this?
I totally agree. I think when the new APIs added, we will have "Featured market" by volume, by the way.
I always appreciate for your great inputs.
58
General Discussion / Re: EASY FIX to improve user experience on DEX
« on: February 16, 2016, 02:47:30 am »
It's a good idea, but I think having specialized exchange page is better, i.e. exchange.openledger.org, with pre-selected asset pairs (in this example, Openasset market and smartcoin market). If newbie want to buy bitshares, can we tell to him how to use wallet exchange in 1 min? No... we have to start with "what is IOU" first and how to find gateway and openassets and on and on... It's much easier to say, "go poloniex.com"
We have to be simple to sell our products.
We have to be simple to sell our products.
59
General Discussion / Re: BitShares needs separate specialized frontends
« on: February 16, 2016, 12:18:36 am »do itHow would pay for it to be done?
Product first, then money. Show what you sell.
That's fine for you, I like to get in on the ground floor. Whether it's Augur or Ethereum, very early investors that took the risk are extremely happy with the results.
For future projects, I've learned to ask better questions such as:
- Will there be full transparency on how funds will be spent? if not, what will you release?
- If there's a premine, I'd request funds being released based on some type of success criteria in a smart contract?
- How often can we expect to receive updates on the project? Will you commit to 2 mumbles a month?
Many lessons learned from Peertracks, Play, Augur, Gamebet. Speaking of Gamebet,
Transparency and communication, that's what investors want.
I want to ask all workers to provide regular updates (or at least you can show your work records like github commits) to the community, who gives you the payment.
In terms of this, I'm satisfied by xeroc, svk, and abit's works, and want to see Blocktrade's performance.
60
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] Blockchain maintenance developer
« on: February 16, 2016, 12:13:59 am »
You're voted in now, but still no future plan or what have you done from the beginning date.
If you provide weekly or bi-weekly updates, you will get more support from the community.
If you provide weekly or bi-weekly updates, you will get more support from the community.
