Show Posts

46

General Discussion / Re: Self-Regulatory Organization - Mastercoin Foundation, BitShares and ColoredCoins

« on: December 13, 2013, 09:51:32 pm »

The purchasing/closing domain name from previous owner has been in negotiation process.

Stay tuned.

47

General Discussion / Re: [2013-12-16] Shanghai China - BitShares and DACs meeting

« on: December 13, 2013, 09:47:36 pm »

That will be a first local meet-up in the Bitshares Ecosystem.

Our community is the driving force of our movement.

48

Meta / Re: [Stat] Site traffic stats at 2000 active users - 20131212

« on: December 12, 2013, 10:06:16 pm »

Great! Let us keep up with the monthly growth rate.

Any suggestions?

SEO, social networks(facebook, twitter and linkedin) and more traffics from China...

49

General Discussion / Re: KryptoKit

« on: December 10, 2013, 11:09:36 pm »

http://www.coindesk.com/kryptokit-launches-dark-wallet-rival/

50

BitShares PTS / Re: [VOTING] NEW Protoshare Logo (YES/NO)

« on: December 10, 2013, 07:47:20 pm »

Quote from: testz on December 10, 2013, 07:31:12 pm

Quote from: Amazon on December 10, 2013, 07:19:04 pm
Quote from: testz on December 10, 2013, 01:50:47 pm
Please post current official logo

The current official logo is the one shows in the wallet, and also the message icon of this topic.

The new one is in https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1173.0 and also http://protoshares.net

Sorry, I misread the topic and was think we need new logo for Keyhotee ID.
I like ProtoShares logo, I don't think we need new one.

It is important for us to have feedbacks from community, but the new version logo design of protoshare is not on our #1 priority list.

Any further suggestions of our website of 3i and logo of keyhotee?

51

BitShares PTS / Re: DAC Angels - ProtoShares Stakeholders Group

« on: December 10, 2013, 09:14:56 am »

Quote from: Stan on December 05, 2013, 03:36:23 pm

DAC Angels Update

To avoid the risk of losing your PMs in our haystack, we have created a DAC Angels registration form at the bottom of our web site pages. That's the best way to "sign up." (So, please, no more signups via PM.)

However, because of the tremendous response, we've decided that there's really no reason to have a separate Angel group. (We didn't think small shareholders would be interested. It is clear that we were wrong!) We're all potential Angels now.

So we published our latest thoughts in our December general newsletter which everyone can find at http://invictus-innovations.com/news/.

Note that we are not proposing any fixed fund-raising rules for anybody. Just a common place to post unsolicited proposals to the DAC Angel community where you clearly define whatever rules you think work best for your DAC. We also discuss some ideas for decentralized Angel funding of those proposals and the kind of things most Angels would probably want to see discussed in such a proposal.

I'm sure you will have more good ideas.
Let us know what you think here.

Featured article in our Newsletter 03 - December 2013: DAC Angels Rising
(Stan Larimer, President , Invictus Innovations Incorporated)

http://invictus-innovations.com/dac-angels/

Please join us by signing up the registration form at the bottom of the page: our DAC Angels mailing list.

52

General Discussion / Re: Transactions as Proof-of-Stake & The End of Mining

« on: December 09, 2013, 07:58:13 am »

@alexkravets, thank for your suggestion. Would you please continue to share us with your thoguths.

RL does need trust from community.

1>Ripple founders and RL will keep 45%, 5% percentage goes to rewarding system. Is it fair?

Suppose it is fair, and 45% of xrp is deserved for their great ideas and hard works.

2> Another 50% xrp goes to giveaways' distribution system. I have asked many people, some of them are RL employees...GIVEAWAY >

give people for free. Correct me if my bad English leads me to a bad understanding.

In other words, another 50% xrp belongs to other people EXCEPT RL, however RL did not keep its word.

The problem is that RL has been selling xrp to people who suppose to get xrp for free as planned.

RL is rewarded 45% of xrp, how could it look at others' xrp, cashed out xrp for other people, then put the cash into its own pocket?

That is BIG centralized problem, seems like the BD of RL is the chairman of FED in digital space, even much worse...

NOTE: I still think Ripple system has a best solution for financial market in the digital space until today. But the whole business theory and logics is totally wrong if RL want to play in the decentralzed digital space. The exit strategy for RL is to be acquired by a big bank one day.

53

General Discussion / Re: BTER PTS Withdrawals Held

« on: November 28, 2013, 06:41:36 pm »

When did that happen? Today?

54

BitShares PTS / Re: Dying out

« on: November 27, 2013, 10:34:31 pm »

Final smiles belong to truely believers who are adding the real value into 3i over time.

We stay focus on DAC models and Keyhotee platform.

Agree! Exchanges is one of the key parts of 3i, , but the real valued-added services will bring the real value of PTS up.

Short-term traders keep the trading market active, long-term investors keep the exchange price stable.We bless you both.

There are some good exchanges who are working on PTS/BTC and fiat trading.

Cheers!

55