Probably to try to compromise the users computer.

That is even worse.

no, not Mrodstein. I edited the OP out, but I'm monitoring him for the time being

So Mrodstein is the victim? I just notice another ID created from Mrodstein's IP:

212.83.153.128   MRodstein, alexrukov

The BitShares Forum is a website meant to host free discussion of BitShares and related topics. It is operated as a service to the community. All moderators are required to provide a balanced and unbiased moderation to all topics. Please get familiar with the basic forum rules:
http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=26.0

There are three administrators in this forum:
bytemaster, boshen1011, Amazon

To apply for Board Moderator position in Development or Economics category, please get bytemaster's approval before you contact Amazon.
To apply for Board Moderator position in Local or Others category, please contact Amazon directly.
To apply for Global Moderator position, please get at least two of the three administrator's approval before you contact Amazon.

If you find any moderator involves in any kind of scam, please report to all three admins immediately.

Quote from: Amazon on November 14, 2013, 03:05:47 pm

What is technical support for?

Miner, Pool, Wallet (technical) discussions.

Edit: and bugs around the involved softwares

There is a sticky bug reporting topic in the "Mining Issue & Pools" Child board. Miner and pools technical questions are also address in that board.

The future products like keyhotee domainshares and bitshares may need their own child board to address technical support. bytemaster may add them when necessary.

I believe Donschoe said the largest wallets he'd seen had about 20k in them.  I can confirm I did single buyer orders at 20k quantities when the price was .003-.004 to individuals who are very unlikely to sell and are not affiliated with Invictus.

Wow, that is 1%, like the Winklevoss brothers 

Thanks!

Quote from: Amazon on November 13, 2013, 03:48:51 pm

After 1 million blocks of the ProtoShares, the block rewards will be very low. How to guarantee there is enough miners (decentralized hash power) to secure the system and fulfill the transactions without merge mining? If not BitShares, which DAC can be in same level as ProtoShares?

We may migrate to ProtoShares2 that will be based upon the BitShares code base at which point it would support merged mining and ProtoShares1 will no longer be honored.

5) We reserve the right to release ProtoShares v2 that honors 100% of ProtoShares v1 with 100% of the money supply allocated.

Then why not just let PTS v1 merged to BitShares blockchain even if they are in different level of the tree. I am not sure about PTS v2, I think it may confuse people that their PTS is diluted.

Quote from: bytemaster on Today at 12:24:37 AM

1) All chains Invictus launches will be derived from ProtoShares with a 1:1 mapping and 10% of the ultimate money supply of that chain.
2) ProtoDomains may Split from ProtoShares prior to the Launch of DomainShares so that it can be traded and valued separately.   
3) Keyhotee ID is not a currency, there is no way to map ProtoShares into Keyhotee ID (the name chain)
4) There will be many BitShares based chains, not one, and all of them will be 1:1 with ProtoShares
5) We reserve the right to release ProtoShares v2 that honors 100% of ProtoShares v1 with 100% of the money supply allocated. 
6) Associated Press, DAC would honor ProtoShares

Exceptions to the ProtoShares honoring would be if we decided to release a true competitor to be used as a money-only coin and not a trading platform.  In this case we may choose to honor the initial positions in ALL existing *-coin chains proportional to their market cap. 

I want to make it very clear that at no time will we 'reset the clock' for a new chain and owning ProtoShares today does get you ownership in everything we do in the future either directly or indirectly.