Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - hpenvy

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 30
46
General Discussion / Re: CoinCecko * BitShares #11 * Developer 59%
« on: December 13, 2014, 07:18:53 pm »
How handles our coinmarketcap interactions? If they are willing to contact Coingecko, that would be a big help.  If not, we can handle it on Nullstreet.

47
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: argentina-marketing.matt608 is now live! Please VOTE for this vital project!
« on: December 13, 2014, 06:40:34 pm »
Quote from: Graffenwalder on December 13, 2014, 05:46:11 pm
The decisions we make now, will have an effect on further BTS adoption.


Great statement. It reminds me how wonderful it would be to see an official marketing/project plan and the work that's been done over the last 4 months. As for Matt's delegate, Elmato and Fran2k support Matt's initiative and those guys are already making a difference at the Bitcoin Embassy.

http://www.meetup.com/Bitcoin-Argentina/photos/25792368/

I feel like you have valid criticisms on the writing, I just want to offer a different point of view.

48
General Discussion / Re: CoinCecko * BitShares #11 * Developer 59%
« on: December 13, 2014, 06:20:01 pm »
Quote from: chryspano on December 13, 2014, 06:18:31 pm
bing returns 36000 results, not 4800

alexa ranking is 232.000 position, not 470.000

I haven't checked anything else but I can bet that all their "stats" are wrong.

I only brought it up because it was referenced in a recent article on CCN.

49
General Discussion / Geekdom San Francisco Dec 16th Live Stream
« on: December 13, 2014, 06:15:39 pm »
http://bitcoinmagazine.com/18863/live-video-stream-sf-bitcoin-meetup-geekdom-2/

The article mentions 1 minute talks to announce crypto projects or events, huge networking opportunity that live streamed.  Who do we have in the area that can attend?


50
General Discussion / Re: Benefits of Becoming a BitShares Gateway
« on: December 13, 2014, 06:09:37 pm »
Quote from: cass on December 10, 2014, 11:45:59 am
any updates on this !? Want to transform it cass*fast like into a kick ass doc :)

Any other thoughts? This is a big deal to get right.

51
General Discussion / Re: CoinCecko * BitShares #11 * Developer 59%
« on: December 13, 2014, 06:07:12 pm »
Quote from: Shentist on December 13, 2014, 06:05:47 pm
Quote from: hpenvy on December 13, 2014, 06:00:12 pm
https://www.coingecko.com/en

Anyone else think this assessment is off?

it points us in the direction we have to go. At the moment we are week in the public/social points. Development should be higher, but i am not sure if github is correct counted.

I'm comfortable with the social score assessment, it's the development percentage that doesn't make sense to me.

52
General Discussion / Re: OIL. Let's get this asset going.
« on: December 13, 2014, 06:06:13 pm »
Quote from: Empirical1.1 on December 13, 2014, 06:00:53 pm
I see BitReserve are going to be in attendance at the Beunos Aries meet up.

Quote from: ElMato on December 10, 2014, 10:22:14 pm
I've been talking with Juan Llanos from BitReserve and it seems he is attending tomorrow, lets see what it turns out

Meanwhile our official marketing team never even acknowledged that market.

BitReserve do really do get to be a fox in the BitShares henhouse.

Challenging the BitAsset brand (which we've had a year to cement), key markets and there's worse they can do too, but I won't mention it, they've already potentially taken the BitOil idea from this thread.

While I doubt they got the idea from the thread, you bring up a valid point about BitAsset branding. You don't need a polished wallet to start introducing the brand into the market. Oh well, that window is gone.  Now we need to take a different approach to an awareness campaign.

53
General Discussion / CoinGecko * BitShares #11 * Developer 59%
« on: December 13, 2014, 06:00:12 pm »
https://www.coingecko.com/en

Anyone else think this assessment is off?

54
General Discussion / Re: Buenos Aires, Dec 11 !
« on: December 13, 2014, 05:34:08 pm »
Quote from: fran2k on December 08, 2014, 06:13:11 am

We are also officially working with matt608 and supporting his three month plans for his delegate campaign.[2]


If everyone wants to see more of these great initiatives, let's get the funding rolling.

55
General Discussion / Re: BitBazaar concept
« on: December 12, 2014, 11:32:28 pm »
Thoughts on BlackCoin's double deposit two party escrow?


http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2fil2x/does_openbazaar_plan_on_implementing_twoparty/

"For example, I want to sell you a bauble. You deposit your payment into a multi-sig address that requires both our consent to release the funds. I can verify that deposit before sending you the bauble.

In addition to that, we also agree to deposit a certain amount of funds into a second multi-sig address that requires both our consent, to be used as collateral against the trade.

If I don't satisfy the trade, you won't release me the funds. If I satisfy the trade and you still don't release the funds, then you risk losing those funds and your collateral. This is important, because it means we both have more to lose by scamming each other, than by completing an honest trade.
"


56
General Discussion / Re: BitBazaar concept
« on: December 12, 2014, 08:52:39 pm »
Quote from: jsidhu on December 12, 2014, 08:38:07 pm
Quote from: lil_jay890 on December 12, 2014, 02:32:47 am
I have contacted bitmarkets.  They said that they would be willing to do a fork so that their bitmarkets program works with bitshares.

The want to charge $200/hour as a consulting fee... I mentioned applying for a delegate job but they don't seem interested.

Does this seem like something that we would want to do???

This is their website: Voluntary.net and  http://cofactorsoftware.com

If its open source I can do it.

How is your delegate push coming along?  I really want to see you working on Open Bazaar and bitBazaar. :)

57
General Discussion / Re: Weekly or Biweekly Updates. Is it too much to ask?
« on: December 12, 2014, 07:22:51 pm »
Say No To Closed Source Marketing

I'm struggling with the logic. We have no problem being open source in development, even with the potential for competitors to use our tech. Ok, but when it comes to marketing, the secret sauce is too sensitive to share?

It doesn't make sense to me. Look at the progress at Nullstreet. We have the opportunity to question and be critical of each others ideas which leads to a better product.

I speak for myself. Could I please get an official answer? I'm not interested in analogies, just a direct response. Maybe I don't understand the weird dynamic. Maybe a separate marketing and business director role needs to be defined as mentioned above?

58
General Discussion / Re: Thunderclap Campaign #2 - Development & Brainstorming
« on: December 12, 2014, 03:53:11 pm »
Quote from: G1ng3rBr34dM4n on December 12, 2014, 02:28:34 pm
Draft of the message that would be tweeted:

Here's your chance to be one of the first people in history to be employed directly by the #blockchain AND get #paidbyprotocol.

 +5%

59
General Discussion / Re: October Newsletter - Halloween Edition
« on: December 12, 2014, 03:48:07 pm »
Quote from: Stan on December 10, 2014, 04:47:45 am
Quote from: hpenvy on December 10, 2014, 02:31:27 am
Do we have an ETA for the next newsletter that gets blasted to our subscribers?

Long, long before this...



Working on it now.

Do you need additional help on future issues so we're able to make it closer to a monthly release? 

60
General Discussion / Re: BTER withdrawals working?
« on: December 12, 2014, 03:31:18 pm »
Quote from: bitsharesmarket on December 12, 2014, 03:27:03 pm
Quote from: svk on December 12, 2014, 02:41:28 pm
Quote from: House on December 12, 2014, 07:41:49 am
guys... I have enjoyed using BTER for quite a while but I just found out news that is quite perplexing....
It appears they are not as honest as I thought... anyone else hear ?

Hint :

2014-12-06 11:21:04 AM] International Rob: starting tomoroow steven and i wil start placing support and slowly bring the price back up over 300 sat
[2014-12-06 11:21:34 AM] linhan.ee: great. it's a good chance.
[2014-12-06 11:21:58 AM] linhan.ee: i am so glad to hear this. you are professional
[2014-12-06 11:23:54 AM] International Rob: i know sometime i act crazy... and its cause of the weed i smoke\
[2014-12-06 11:24:03 AM] International Rob: but when itr comes to business its serious
[2014-12-08 1:25:15 PM] International Rob: hi lin
[2014-12-08 1:25:18 PM] International Rob: are you awake?
[9:19:09 PM] International Rob: Lin bro
[9:19:12 PM] International Rob: we have some problems
[9:19:22 PM] International Rob: we need to dump the price and pick up all the coins for cheap
[9:19:26 PM] International Rob: are you here
[9:19:26 PM] International Rob: ?

SOURCE : http://pastebin.com/iintnvAj

Can you provide some more info on this please? What coin are they talking about for starters? Who are those guys and what does this have to do with BTER? And what is your take on it all?

BitBay. It had its ICO a few weeks ago - on BTER, and has dropped 75% ever since. The whole thing appears to be a big scam. I know I lost a btc in this debacle. From what I read in the BitBay forum discussion on bitcointalk, accusations of BTER owner being involved are being thrown around.

That looked like a train wreck from the original post. I'm sure that community will figure it out until the next 1000+ BTC project comes along on Bitcointalk. BTER have been nothing but good to us, that's all I care about personally. Bad situation for anyone who lost money.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 30

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 23 queries.