Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
你们有没有和一些国内外的游戏开发团队进行过接触？如果有，他们对Play项目的回应是什么？
Have you contact with any game developers yet? If so, what is their responce to Play? If not, have you got any plan to do so? How its look like?
Please ask and vote on questions for HackFisher (of Bitshares PLAY) at the following link: Beyond Bitcoinx SubReddit:
Or better yet--Join us! Follow the twitter: @Beyond_Bitcoin
Follow the Discussion on our #BeyondBitcoin IRC
Or even listen to us directly at the Beyond Bitcoinx Community Site
For updates on upcoming events, attend, record and report live from our Beyond Bitcoinx Mumble Server!
Always remember--your voice is needed!
市场挂单部分(包括bid, sell, short, 除bts外其他asset)不计入分配？这个为什么在快照之前没说明，我当时挂了100w的short单，但未成交，也就是这部分bts分不到play的筹码？请问对于short出去的btsx，快照的分配规则是什么？
空单持有者会得到两倍的分配吗？这样感觉有点问题，因为他并不真正拥有所有作为抵押品的btsx
市场挂单部分(包括bid, sell, short, 除bts外其他asset)不计入分配，准确的定义是bts 区块链中的balance record （address --> balance）
我虽然挂单，在成交之前都有这部分bts的所有权。居然分不到play！
感觉很不公平。
HackFisher能不能解释一下为什么这样。
I don't get it.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=11140.msg148175#msg148175
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=11269.0
Great...for the hours ago... how should I know that.. anywhere posted or hinted that you even think of doing such a thing?One and only one question I have is:
Why do you believe that people that have the most trust and believe in the BTS system, and therefore have their stake not only in BTS, but more than that - in collateral - deserve no stake in your PLAY DAC?
First, we've already changed that decision hours ago, and pay extra effort to find out in which way PLAY should be allocated to collaterals. This is why we have this forum to communicate with each other, post proposals.
We are currently evaluating this, and after a few tests, we may honor the market orders (_ask_db, _bid_db, _short_odb, _collateral_db) if the tests showing that it's OK to do so.
Second, PLAY DAC is a fork of BitShares Toolkit, A independent DAC, there is no such consensus (Like AGS/PTS) that we MUST honor BTS, or collaterals put on its market or even BitUSDs created using collaterals.
This allocation to BTS is also a airdrop, not a part of consensus from BTS or Toolkit.
Can BTS that is locked up in a margin order be included in the snapshot? My gut tells me, probably not. Unless you were to take the initial BTS put up as collateral from each side of the trade?
If not, will BTS locked up in orders as collateral be excluded from the total supply the 35% allocation is honoring?
yes, as you described, market orders will not be included, the exactly definition would be the balance records in balance db (the balance you see in your wallet).
HackFisher... all stake regardless of where it is located should be considered. If you need a script to dump it out for you that can be arranged. Lets not make this complicated.
I assume that if we haven't yet converted our BTS from the Feb 28 PTS/AGS snapshot that they will still be allocated in PLAY. Similar to DNS and VOTE. Is this correct?
Great...for the hours ago... how should I know that.. anywhere posted or hinted that you even think of doing such a thing?One and only one question I have is:
Why do you believe that people that have the most trust and believe in the BTS system, and therefore have their stake not only in BTS, but more than that - in collateral - deserve no stake in your PLAY DAC?
First, we've already changed that decision hours ago, and pay extra effort to find out in which way PLAY should be allocated to collaterals. This is why we have this forum to communicate with each other, post proposals.
We are currently evaluating this, and after a few tests, we may honor the market orders (_ask_db, _bid_db, _short_odb, _collateral_db) if the tests showing that it's OK to do so.
Second, PLAY DAC is a fork of BitShares Toolkit, A independent DAC, there is no such consensus (Like AGS/PTS) that we MUST honor BTS, or collaterals put on its market or even BitUSDs created using collaterals.
This allocation to BTS is also a airdrop, not a part of consensus from BTS or Toolkit.
One and only one question I have is:
Why do you believe that people that have the most trust and believe in the BTS system, and therefore have their stake not only in BTS, but more than that - in collateral - deserve no stake in your PLAY DAC?
We are currently evaluating this, and after a few tests, we may honor the market orders (_ask_db, _bid_db, _short_odb, _collateral_db) if the tests showing that it's OK to do so.
Sure fuzz you should run it...
as long as they are willing participants in the tourney it should be fine...
who cares if somebody is screwed to provide the 'prize money'... it is fine...
as long as it is not US it is OK.
Sorry what's the problem? I didn't get it.
Really? You play the idiot now?
Read my post in your allocation thread.
I am not neither.Remember that this airdrop is not from your collateral, it is from reserved funds. The allocation to BTS is proportionally to the sum BTS of the total holders, regardless of what proposal.
Better English will be very much appreciated!!!!!
airdrop is not from your collateral, it is from reserved funds???
The allocation to BTS is proportionally to the sum BTS of the total holders, regardless of what proposal.
?
I'm not native English speaker, sorry about that.
Unfortunately, this does not allow us to make no sense!
Remember that this airdrop is not from your collateral, it is from reserved funds. The allocation to BTS is proportionally to the sum BTS of the total holders, regardless of what proposal.
Better English will be very much appreciated!!!!!
airdrop is not from your collateral, it is from reserved funds?
The allocation to BTS is proportionally to the sum BTS of the total holders, regardless of what proposal.
?
Sure fuzz you should run it...
as long as they are willing participants in the tourney it should be fine...
who cares if somebody is screwed to provide the 'prize money'... it is fine...
as long as it is not US it is OK.
Sorry what's the problem? I didn't get it.
Really? You play the idiot now?
Read my post in your allocation thread.
This will kill the market.Can BTS that is locked up in a margin order be included in the snapshot? My gut tells me, probably not. Unless you were to take the initial BTS put up as collateral from each side of the trade?
If not, will BTS locked up in orders as collateral be excluded from the total supply the 35% allocation is honoring?
yes, as you described, market orders will not be included, the exactly definition would be the balance records in balance db (the balance you see in your wallet).
We are currently evaluating this, and after a few tests, we may honor the market orders (_ask_db, _bid_db, _short_odb, _collateral_db) if the tests showing that it's OK to do so.
Screw this stupid Tournament, fuzz!!!
HackFisher is stealing close to a million from me personally and other people who believe too much in the BTS system (i.e. we having our funds in collateral, aka supporting the system) to give insignificant amounts to just one of hundreds of game heads. And how much is the stupid first prize?
You should not be a tool in the hand of the shameless promotional screw up, fuzz!
Sure fuzz you should run it...
as long as they are willing participants in the tourney it should be fine...
who cares if somebody is screwed to provide the 'prize money'... it is fine...
as long as it is not US it is OK.
