New Banx Update Folks >> http://banxcapital.com/banx-update-2nd-aug-2015/

Mark! Why do you need 6 screens that display exactly the same information?

How is it possible that ethereum has a bigger BTC marketcap, compared with bitshares, but not $ wise?

It's just sorted by BTC valuation...

It seems that since it is human decided, its basically a rating service, similar to stock analysts.

Usually such analysts will call a 5 star pick a "buy" and a 1 star a "sell", instead of referring to something they give 1 star to as "crap". 

Its kindof funny to see a rating site declare something to be "crap" (especially when one doesnt like it), but it doesnt seem that professional.

Our rating is not about buy / sell rather remember / forget. We don't want to make it for speculations but for long term investments. It is quite possible to calculate positions especially for purposes of speculations. Instead we aim to look deeper.

Statement: If network effect has been established it's impossible to break it.

Thus the more established network effect - the higher the rating. We believe that such approach will allow our users to gain more from investing in blockchains. Look to CoinGecko! The do a great job and try to calculate everything. But Primecoin ranked #18. Compare it with our approach with BitShares music on the #18 posstion. There is your money? In Primecoin or BitShares music?
The deal with cyber•Rating is that I can give personal advice for my personal and social graph to invest in top rated assets, but cannot do it with Coinmarketcap or CoinGecko. Do you?

Unprofessional word "crap"? What word do you like to use for asset like Bilshares (don't confuse with BitShares)?
- #62 on Coinmarketcap with cap of $420k
- traded on 1 chinese exchange
- 1 initial commit one year ago
- site don't work
- blockexplorer don't exist
Please suggest professional word and we will use it. :-)

Quote from: Ander on July 20, 2015, 07:53:16 pm

Quote from: 21xhipster on July 20, 2015, 07:47:40 pm

Quote from: jakub on July 20, 2015, 04:46:01 pm

And I guess some people here will be disappointed that Qora is in the "crap" category.

Agree. Guys so long stayed in the shadow so... Thanks for notice.

If the rating is because the creator (Qora) left, are you aware that Qora was picked up by several new developers after the creator left the project, and development is now ongoing, they have had several new releases over the past few months each one containing new features?

Wait until people see v22, which should be released any day now.  I have to question the validity of any ranking system that has Qora listed as "Crap". It shows that very little, if any, research was done.

We've use this ranking system internally for almost a year. Thus 'Qora crap thing' is historical stuff and will be reviewed ASAP.
The best solution is to enrich metadata yourself and make a pull request.
https://github.com/cyberFund/chaingear/blob/gh-pages/sources/Qora/Qora.toml
Next thing to release is nice landing pages for systems with an option for customization by developers.

• You have problem with your ceritificate. Chrome does not trust your site.

Thanks. Could you provide more information? Screenshots, Chrome version, OS..
We've tested certificate in all browsers...

And you should change the notation for small numbers:

Price per 1 Qora:
Ƀ 7.09308e-8

Thanks. Will be fixed next release

Are all the ratings mathematically determined based on the other factors, or is there a human going through at the end and rating things?

Nice effort but.. what's clearly missing is an explanation on your website what criteria you use for the rating system.
And how did you arrive at valuations of assets which are not traded anywhere e.g. Factom or Ethereum?

• I could not find your rating criteria in 2 minutes time. Gave up.

I like it, but how are the rankings determined? If BitShares has a few hundred dollars more in trading volume than NXT, does that make it better?

Nope. Human going through and rate.
That is really complicated issue. To calculate growth rate (or measure feedback loop) I see at least 4 things should be clear for majority of systems:
- precise historical off chain market data
- indexed blockchains
- twitter sentiments analysis
- historical conversion rate within our site
That is actually huge amount of work ahead, so we decide to start from less complicated things and just go further as we gather and analyse more data.
Thanks for a feedback. We'll add description of the rating soon with faces who rated all this stuff.
Once we gather enough data there will be a bounty for a best algo proposal with access to our indexing cluster. Though that is not so close opportunity :-(