61
Technical Support / My account balances are empty after I import my keys
« on: October 13, 2015, 11:55:38 pm »
During the initial import it DID list my balances correctly and after it finished there was nothing.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
need.
If bitshares can solve some real problems, then there will be some needs and bitshare has value.
The fail of bitshares 1.0 is because it failed to solve any problem. Let us see whether bitshares 2.0 will or not.
Um, actually...
Only account upgrades do vest for 90 days. Fees are paid within 20 minutes I think
I don't see why referral fees for upgraded accounts would need to vest either. Assuming I'm not missing something, any vesting will diminish the effectiveness of the program, so I hope the concept is completely removed so we can start it off on the right foot instead of generating negative buzz and having to vote to fix it later anyway.
What's the sybil attack here? If someone wants to create tons of fake accounts, pay the membership fees, and then get back 80% of his own money with the other 20% going to the network, I say be my guest!
I still can't see any reason to introduce vesting into this.
Only account upgrades do vest for 90 days. Fees are paid within 20 minutes I think
I don't see why referral fees for upgraded accounts would need to vest either. Assuming I'm not missing something, any vesting will diminish the effectiveness of the program, so I hope the concept is completely removed so we can start it off on the right foot instead of generating negative buzz and having to vote to fix it later anyway.
Instead of number of referrals, I think actual amount of referral fees earned would be a good measure of how much they are benefiting Bitshares.
Speaking of referral fees, my understanding is that there will be a vesting period. Can anyone explain why this would be necessary? Maybe I'm being really dense here, but I just can't think of a scenario where a referral system in which referral fees are paid out of funds collected from the referred user can be gamed.
On the other hand, if Bitshares was to pay a referral fee for each new user regardless of whether they buy a membership or transact on the network, then yes, in that case I can see the system getting gamed left and right. But not the way it's currently proposed. What am I missing here?
Does anyone have a screenshot of the trading/exchange screen? I don't have time to import my wallet at the moment to check it out.
So the question is, what type of platform do you want graphene to be? Who is your target audience, the primary purchasers you want to make graphene customers? Why are they your target?
The current system is a decentralised version of what has worked well to create successful and competitive companies for hundreds of years.