Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - kisa

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 16
46
General Discussion / Re: ripple rally
« on: December 16, 2014, 03:07:07 pm »
agree with Rune, Ripple rise would be rather positive for BitShares.
Both because it draws serious institutional attention into crypto 2.0 projects, and because BitShares is complementary to Ripple.

Ripple  is targeting to replace SWIFT etc. for the existing banking system, with the nodes will likely be controlled by some interbanking network. So not exactly centralised, but definitely not as decentralised and democratic as BTS!

Much higher XRP market cap is reflective in my view of rather mature system. As far as I understand, Ripple Labs had certain time advance versus Invictus with regards to product design, team building, development, marketing. BTS is much more "work in progress with moving targets" which will imo a fundamentally new type of economic organization and will prove its strength over time due to its inherent flexibility.

Still, just a few months ago, Ripple had major issues with dev team stability and initial stakes distributions, suffering huge declines in market cap (from $10bn peak for all 100bn xrp in Dec 2013 to some $400m a few months ago). The possible reversal of the fortunes now provides a good example for BitShares to stick in and continue to work on improvements, resolving issues, and keeping enthusiasm independently of price action...

47
thanks luckybit for posting this!
i appreciate reading your ideas are insights as original and stimulating, - i see no issue if most of them yet remain within a theoretical realm ..

48
General Discussion / Re: Updates From Adam
« on: December 16, 2014, 01:21:27 pm »
Thanks for update and please keep us posted again!  +5%

49
General Discussion / Re: Ripple approaching $2 billion mkt cap
« on: December 16, 2014, 05:14:21 am »
Ripple has sofar mostly targeted banking industry to replace SWIFT and it could become complementary to BTS, without making one of the platforms obsolete. Also a chance that XRP could grow into stateless worldwide reserve currency in a few decades. I think any 2.0 crypto rise is rather beneficial to BitShares, as it draws more serious institutional attention to the sector. Higher market cap imho simply reflects the fact that Ripple is more mature system than BTS. Nevertheless, a few month ago, they had serious issues wrt to dev team stability and initial distribution...

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=11636.0;all

50
General Discussion / Re: Is the Official Marketing Team Sleeping?
« on: December 16, 2014, 03:46:46 am »
Sunk cost is one perspective...

Why not consider this as investment into the steep learning curve - which is impossible without mistakes/trial&error? The more often we are able to learn from mistakes - the more competitive we become! Please note that the benefit of hindsight is a common reaction bias to previous inherently risky decisions...
- if BM learned anything useful about how marketers/non-tech folks think
- if this all triggered community mobilization
- if there is no misuse/bad intent ongoing
- given this clearing up before 1.0 launch
=> there is no need for regrets ☺

51
General Discussion / Re: Forum Traffic is Up
« on: December 14, 2014, 09:17:38 am »
Check out the general discussion board of our only real competitor: https://nxtforum.org/general-discussion/

The bitshares community is big, and it's active. The Chinese community is likely as big as the entire english speaking community, and much bigger if you measure net worth, so what we experience here is just the tip of the iceberg. We've already been through a lot, just in the past few months, yet we have managed to stay very coherent and maintained solidarity. 1-3 months from now when the protocol is ready, full node GUI is ready, mobile wallet is ready, devshares are ready, marketing gets sorted out, then we'll be heading for some very good times.

I would say our competitors are also people like BitReserve, despite being centralised are still a threat to the BitAsset brand, they've also got a $100 million+ valuation already. Also guys like Ethereum and potentially Ripple or something that comes out of that.

BitShares requires some re-allocation of resources from complacency, cheerleading and metaphors to action, advertising and talent imo.
+5%

52
Lol, we completely brigaded that thread. Now if it would only go to the frontpage...

 +5% good job gents!

53
General Discussion / Re: Least volatile measure of value. What could it be?
« on: December 12, 2014, 02:58:16 pm »
So, you need to find something that does have value everywhere.. and is available to buy in the currencies you want to compare.

Erm, yes. That's basically the question in the OP.

perhaps all measures are relative and all value is an illusion..

Exactly. (The illusion of value *is* a subjective value.)

most constant for the U.S. is the value of some stable basket of goods and services for an "average" family / "average" enterpreneur
- such basket has to be amended now and then for innovative products
- should include certain financial assets, commodities and real estate (as opposed to current measures used by FED)

for other countries, perhaps a somewhat different basket should be used...

so the least volatile index in terms of real value would be a weighted basket of world currencies, each adjusted for local inflation as defined per respective country's basket of goods and services.

54
General Discussion / Re: Did any news just happen?
« on: December 12, 2014, 12:33:49 pm »
Upward pressure on bitUSD peg due to Chinese demand or is it an update/feed issue with coinmarketcap?

55
General Discussion / Re: Least volatile measure of value. What could it be?
« on: December 12, 2014, 10:27:20 am »
bitHour, bitLBS, bitMile - all sounds fun :)

What OP is looking for is however per definition some kind of CPI/PPI basket of goods and services, with all its challenges...

56
General Discussion / Re: Venezuela needs bitUSD
« on: December 08, 2014, 08:45:15 pm »
Thought recently about those countries with capital controls and crashing national currencies...
The question I was puzzled with is - who is going to sell bitUSD to a Venezuelan, and for what?

if Venezuelan wants to buy bitUSD for cash or bank Bolivar - who will be ready to part with their bitUSD for Bolivars and what would be their motivation? 

If Venezuelan wants to get USD out of the country and instead of carrying fiat it is way less risky to carry bitUSD balance through customs - which seller of bitUSD is happy to get paid cash USD in Caracas? Be it some international guy who travels and has USD account in the US, so he can buy bitUSD with it. But why such seller would want his USD back in cash in Venezuela?

Agree bitUSD could be great remittance vehicle. Also if some people who have cash USD in Caracas prefer to hold bitUSD for more secure storage, but here again, this requires a local seller who somehow managed to buy bitUSD from someone with access to on ramps.

Does someone understand what I am trying to express here? Apologies if my concern is not as clearly articulated. I mean for every buyer there has to be a seller or a short who is happy to be paid in something that a buyer has...

Is the answer similar to China - they mine BTC locally and exchange this into bitUSD??

57
Technical Support / Re: Balance missing because of old wallet file
« on: December 08, 2014, 03:30:12 pm »
please see here the original thread, Vikram...
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=8371.msg114079#msg114079

to briefly summarize - on september 8th i bought 1000 bitUSD and left some market orders. later that day my windows crashed and i had to run system recovery. unfortunately i only had old wallet backup. all my market transactions and orders of September 8th show outflows to unknown, so i am missing some 120K BTSX and 1000bitUSD in my balance. xeroc kindly posted this issue on https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares_toolkit/issues/769

Pretty much in the same spot. Got about 1000BitUSD and 60KBTSX not showing up in my total. What I'd like to know if they went to collateral or if they will at some point be recovered.

I have not forgotten about these issues; I will be looking into them.

Thanks Vikram. Would such issues still be worked on if the merger happens?

Yes, I will address as many issues as I can regardless of any DAC merges.

I have started rewriting some of the key (re)generating code. I suspect your wallet(s) somehow got into an inconsistent state where the current version of wallet_regenerate_keys won't properly regenerate everything. My updates won't make it into the next release (0.4.21), but when the changes are ready we will see if hopefully you can regenerate the proper keys to unlock your funds.

v0.4.24 is out (https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/releases/tag/v0.4.24) which finally has some updates to the wallet key handling and regeneration.

kisa and bitmeat if you are still missing funds, try the following steps exactly as I've written them:
  • Make sure you have the wallet or wallet backup of the wallet you originally used for the market orders that you are missing funds from.
  • Open the wallet (or restore the backup) with v0.4.24.
  • Unlock the wallet if you haven't already.
  • Make a new backup of the wallet that we will restore to later.
  • We will now regenerate a large number of keys. This will make the wallet slow afterwards, so after we are done we will restore from the most recent backup.
  • Use the command "wallet_regenerate_keys <account_name> 10500", replacing <account_name> with your relevant account name. This will take some time to generate all those keys and then rescan the blockchain.
  • Check "wallet_account_balance". Does that balance include your missing funds now?
  • Check "wallet_market_order_list". Do you have any orders which you weren't able to access before?
  • If you are able to access any missing funds, it's easiest to just transfer your entire balance back to yourself.
  • Restore the backup we created in step (4) and if you transferred any new funds back to yourself, it should show up as an incoming transaction and you should be able to access those funds now.

Let me know if this helps anyone.

Finally I had time to implement the above instructions.

First, I deinstalled all previous client versions and deleted bitshares directory under appshare/ roaming.

Then I downloaded v.0.4.24 from bitshares.org and created an empty wallet.

Syncing blocks didn't work first, got stuck now and then, after I agreed to patch updates. I had to reinstall clean and rejected patch updates. Sync crashed half time, but resumed next day and completed. Then I installed patch updates.

Importing old .json backup did work, and I created new backup before regenerating keys.

Then - great news - regenerating keys 10500 did work and restored missing balances from old orders!

Then I transfered part of BTS to myself (as I was afraid to transfer all funds yet). Outgoing balance was substracted but incoming balance didn't show up, also not after wallet_account_balance.

When I restored to the newly created backup, still the incoming balance from the latest self transfer was missing.

 When I tried to quit client crashed. At re-opening the client showed empty wallet, was not connecting. I agreed to reindexing database.

Then client at default picked up a strange version of wallet, with somewhat incorrect balance and without transaction history. I attempted to regenerate 10500 keys again, and transaction history appeared again after a very slow rescan. Still the recent self-transfer part of balance was missing and self - transfer didn't show under transaction history.

Perhaps I better wait until a new version and then try again, as the client keeps crashing at this stage and I don't want to invest more time into this struggle, as I am not tech person.

Anyway, when I saw restored balance at some point during that process, this gave me confidence that at some future point I get all my funds and will be able to trade on market seamless :)

good luck guys with the new release!

58
General Discussion / Re: Holy smokes new old conspiracy prophecy
« on: December 07, 2014, 12:20:59 pm »
thanks for posting - interesting to watch and he is definitely sharp, knowledgeable and eloquent.

please keep in mind though that his very business model is based on serving FUD into the minds of the certain proportion of population (10-15%) which is genetically susceptible to and feeding on conspiracy theories. This is not to deny the facts about and the risks of the current financial system, emergency plans etc. Still, the point is how much one should equate a certain imaginary low likelihood static path scenario to something inevitable. I bet Rickards gets quite substantial amounts of stable USD for his propaganda ;)

59
General Discussion / Re: My TEDx Bermuda Presentation on Cryptocurrencies
« on: December 07, 2014, 10:34:53 am »
However brief, this was indeed an insightful and inspiring talk - thank you Charles! :)

60
General Discussion / Re: Fuelling the Decentralization Movement (Video)
« on: December 06, 2014, 05:28:57 pm »
interesting....

RT is Russian State-backed media.  I find it quite interesting that some projects have a seemingly easy time getting on these outlets while others cannot (bitshares is among them).

this is especially weird as bitcoin is kind of "forbidden" in russia...
i guess this works like placing an ad which has to be paid for both in USD (official) plus a "gift" stake in a project to the program manager perhaps?

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 16