Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
国内近日已新增以下 API 服务器节点，使用网页钱包和轻钱包的可以自行添加：
● wss://bit.btsabc.org/ws （比特股中文网 @吴序强 提供）
● wss://bts.transwiser.com/ws （易转网 @巨蟹 提供）
● wss://freedom.bts123.cc:15138 （著名的黑粉 @惨 提供）
● wss://okbtc.org:8089/ws （bebtc.com 的 @郑浩 提供）
● wss://ratebts.com:8089（@AJ 提供）
● wss://openledger.hk/ws （OpenLedger 香港提供）
人们为什么不直接买理财？把bitcny充值到比特时代，然后购买时代财富的理财，是最佳选择。
Yes,Who want to increase bitusd，please short your bts by yourself .don't stare at others.QuoteI am still yet to hear any convincing reason why this proposal could have a negative effect on bitshares.Trying to control the money supply in order to induce a bubble is very fed-ish.
Is there a consensus among the committee that demand for BitUSD is not the issue, it is the supply of BitUSD that is the issue?
If not from a worker proposal where does the committee suggest this supply should come from?
Another solution would fit nicely would be that all worker proposals are paid in BitUSD but this would require a hard fork.
@xeroc @bitcrab @Bhuz @clayop @bitcube @abit @dele-puppy @BunkerChain Labs @ebit @Chris4210 @Harvey-xts
Yes it may work to bolster bts in the short term, but it goes against the principles of many members.
"He is the single most important business developer in the world to the near term future of BitShares."Dont't worry ,bitcoin and ethereum is about the same 。
If this is true, I would run from Bitshares as fast as possible.
I see Lyford in that picture, but I guess its not detailed enough for my to recognize Taggart or that Kevin Harrington guy. I'll take your word for it though, unless you want to point them out.
Taggard and Lyford stole hundreds of thousands of dollars from Banx investors. If this man really is critically important for Bitshares, I feel bad for the bag holders.
Good luck.
someone comes here asking a question and what he gets are 2 pages of attacks. for fucks sake, I've never felt so embarrassed for this community, and I'm here for a long time.
these are the facts:
* Anyone who invested in BTS is free to call themselves whatever they like. (remember CEO's of Bitcoin?) - I leave it up to you to give that value or not.
* CNX = Cryptonomex = they worked for BitShares for some time, but are in no way "owners" or something. It's a blockchain company to my knowledge
* BMI 18.5 to 24.9 is Normal weight
I strongly recommend this clown fiesta to end right now and start to communicate without personal attacks or this thread will be closed.
I do find Michael claiming to be a "founder" of BitShares a bit of a stretch to say the very least, however. Obviously Stan, Michael, and I have some differences of opinion on exactly what that term means. I was one of the earliest employees at Invictus, yet I don't consider myself a founder. Here's the definition I generally agree with: "The person who creates an organization or a company is known as the founder." To my knowledge, there are exactly two founders for BitShares: Dan Larimer and Charles Hoskinson.
Actually, I filed the paperwork that founded Invictus Innovations at the request of Dan and Charles.
Charles secured the funding and Dan invented the technology. Notestein and Li were also there in the beginning.
Invictus worked very hard to emphasize that BitShares was an independent company that came into existence when those who downloaded free Invictus software started the blockchain running for the first time.
When it started running, there were initial genesis holders of 100% of the BitShares based on contributions they made or mining they did. Lots of us were among them.
But since Invictus refuses to claim foundership of BitShares, you'll have to look to those who did the work and claimed the shares as its founders.
Since then Cryptonomex was founded by about 30 people who contributed cash and sweat equity. They are listed as co-founders on the official stock documents.
Michael is listed among those cofounders.
Cryptonomex provided the software BitShares is now using.
So Michael has two perfectly valid claims to using "cofounder" on his resume if he wants to.
