481
General Discussion / Re: XT GUI - v0.0.3 - OS X and Windows
« on: June 22, 2014, 04:39:18 am »XTS6iHycdbBb1kHs9K6fpg3G9EM7XqEWvoGhp6b91Q5ABCCzfbudN
send some xts for my testing, thanks
Sent you some funds.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Sent you some funds.
482
General Discussion / Number of Bitshares X at launch
« on: June 22, 2014, 04:18:12 am »
I vote for 100 Million shares at launch.
That would make each share worth $1, if Bitshares X market cap is $100 Mill, or $10 per share if cap is $ 1 Billion.
That would make each share worth $1, if Bitshares X market cap is $100 Mill, or $10 per share if cap is $ 1 Billion.
484
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares X
« on: June 22, 2014, 03:16:37 am »If it's all the same... why not 40 million instead of 4 million. Or 100 mill. instead of 10 M?
I think 100 mill shares at launch is about right. That would make each share worth about $1 if Bitshares X market cap is at 100 Mill, or $10 per share if cap is $ 1 Billion.
485
General Discussion / Re: XT GUI - v0.0.2 - OS X and Windows
« on: June 22, 2014, 02:32:55 am »Someone pls send me funds - XTS7U782HozQeZYjH9LfjNjG6TJUegM8S5KcVwg9d4Yoqx3tSugXj
Btw there is a typo on the registration page it should be "coming soon" rather than "comming".
Sent you some play funds.
486
General Discussion / Re: XT GUI - v0.0.2 - OS X and Windows
« on: June 22, 2014, 02:29:35 am »after I made a transaction it seems officialy registered
I have about 10 XTS now but I need more to get a delegate
please donate
XTS8DpkcmJNTMnWE4hjwWQMz119XLZMm8PXFYDW88sTaLtGTSr364
Sent you some funds. Enjoy.
487
General Discussion / Re: Dry Run 4: A New Hope
« on: June 21, 2014, 04:29:32 pm »
This is strange. Some delegates don't miss any blocks, others miss many. My delegate node (bitcoiners) seems to be missing a lot of blocks despite being constantly on.
There seem to be a lot of forks though, maybe this is the reason for missed blocks.
Code: [Select]
blockchain_list_delegates 0 10
ID NAME VOTES FOR VOTES AGAINST NET VOTES BLOCKS PRODUCED BLOCKS MISSED
323 btsjohn 10474081729 0 0.1047640741 % 19 0
340 bitcoiners 2816857644 300000 0.02817183174 % 6 12
There seem to be a lot of forks though, maybe this is the reason for missed blocks.
Code: [Select]
>>> list_errors
default (unlocked) >>> list_forks
[
570,
582,
618,
634,
640,
691,
705,
724,
777,
793,
818,
829,
832,
834,
880,
883,
885,
939,
944,
958,
993,
1038,
1041,
1043,
1096,
1099,
1102,
1141,
1144,
1178,
1200,
1203,
1219,
1226,
1239,
1255,
1286,
1299,
1318,
1333,
1341
]
Code: [Select]
>>> get_info
{
"blockchain_head_block_num": 1354,
"blockchain_head_block_time": "20140621T162730",
"blockchain_head_block_time_rel": "59 seconds old",
"blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 302,
"blockchain_average_delegate_participation": 63.046192259675408,
"network_num_connections": 6,
488
General Discussion / Bitshares Bazaar (decentralized market)
« on: June 21, 2014, 03:38:33 pm »
Coindesk has an article on a decentralized, ebay-like market that utilizes bitcoin tech.
http://www.coindesk.com/openbazaar-bitcoin-build-decentralised-ebay/
Seems Bitshares platform is a natural fit for a decentralized, ebay-like service.
http://www.coindesk.com/openbazaar-bitcoin-build-decentralised-ebay/
Seems Bitshares platform is a natural fit for a decentralized, ebay-like service.
489
General Discussion / Re: Dry Run 4: A New Hope
« on: June 21, 2014, 08:45:51 am »How can I see a reason why a block was missed by my delegate?
Same here. I see a few blocks were missed, but now why.
490
General Discussion / Re: Dry Run 4: A New Hope
« on: June 21, 2014, 01:22:28 am »
Trying to issue an asset.
What am I doing wrong?
Code: [Select]
>>> wallet_asset_issue 1000000 BEE bitcoiners "Bees are people too"
10 assert_exception: Assert Exception
my->_blockchain->is_valid_symbol( symbol ):
What am I doing wrong?
491
General Discussion / Re: Dry Run 3: A Game of Delegates
« on: June 20, 2014, 04:41:35 pm »
It seems every block produced by a delegate increases votes for that delegate.. Why?
492
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Feedback request: Redundant, global dedicated cloud host for delegates
« on: June 20, 2014, 04:05:09 pm »
I am interested to host my delegate on such a redundant global cloud. Looking forward to testing your solution.
493
General Discussion / Re: Dry Run 3: A Game of Delegates
« on: June 20, 2014, 03:03:20 pm »
Send me some LOVE or XTS or whatever other asset to "play with"
XTS63FqvmnBD9TcnMktEcL9FY6V6n1HWv2cC45xAMvcgetMEB2nDc
(and vote for bitcoiners
XTS63FqvmnBD9TcnMktEcL9FY6V6n1HWv2cC45xAMvcgetMEB2nDc
(and vote for bitcoiners
494
General Discussion / Re: Dry Run 3: A Game of Delegates
« on: June 20, 2014, 06:12:34 am »
Hopefully this truly is a dry run and no real shares are lost, as I may have just deleted a wallet that I did not back up.
495
General Discussion / Re: Dry Run 3: A Game of Delegates
« on: June 20, 2014, 04:57:52 am »
Ok. My delegate is up and running. (unelected-bitcoiners)
Still it has not produced any blocks yet. Maybe it needs more votes.
Please vote for bitcoiners!
Code: [Select]
blockchain_get_account_record unelected-bitcoiners
Record for 'unelected-bitcoiners' -- Registered on 2014-Jun-01 00:00:00, last update was 19 days ago
Owner's key: XTS8eoFWByxKtGYzBrNF4diAhv1zjY7jGNTUv6PSqVGbQs8yi7nqk
VOTES FOR VOTES AGAINST NET VOTES BLOCKS PRODUCED BLOCKS MISSED LAST BLOCK # TOTAL PAY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.07001704% 1.10094467% -1.0309276% 0 4 4294967295 0.000000 XTS
Still it has not produced any blocks yet. Maybe it needs more votes.
Please vote for bitcoiners!
Code: [Select]
>>> blockchain_list_delegates
..
** Standby:
..
58 unelected-bitcoiners 7187180011 110083397524 -1.029067755 % 0 4
