Quote from: btswildpig on January 15, 2015, 10:06:07 am

Quote from: 520Bit on January 15, 2015, 09:55:40 am

Quote from: btswildpig on January 15, 2015, 09:49:45 am

Quote from: 520Bit on January 15, 2015, 09:48:28 am

Quote from: btswildpig on January 15, 2015, 09:45:33 am

Quote from: 520Bit on January 15, 2015, 09:30:39 am

Quote from: btswildpig on January 15, 2015, 08:37:10 am

Quote from: 520Bit on January 15, 2015, 08:20:17 am

Quote from: btswildpig on January 15, 2015, 07:48:45 am

Quote from: 520Bit on January 15, 2015, 07:43:06 am

Nubits have a good trade volume and hit 18870 BTC yesterday. I don't see BitUSD trade volumes reach 200 BTC so far. As a matter of fact, NBT liquidity is better than BitUSD currently, LOL. Let's see what will happen in future.

We can't say the real truth currently.

Customer will say which one is better, right?

This volume is not generate by real demand of customers , rather than those custodian who holds big funds to conduct high risk operations to earn profit  while exposing the Nubits holders the risk of a bankruptcy .

How is that organic growth ?
How is any of that more stable than any other investment bank out there ?

Bragging about this kind of volume is like a bank manager brag about how he take the depositors's money to gamble at Vagas and earn a big reward to give the bank's shareholders .

Great. Customers are happy to get profit from gambling. 

The customer in this equation is the poor guys who bought NBT an get no profit buy only risks .
The only profiting party here is NSR holder .
And the NSR holder is selling the "stable money" slogan to trick the poor customers to buy NBT in order to provide money for them to gamble .

The customers can also be NSR holders and they do not need to buy NBT. The customers can also hold NSR and vote for NBT.

NBT is a good and stable money for customers to reduce the risk of Bitcoins fluctuation. When BTC rising, sell NBT for BTC and when BTC falling sell BTC for NBT. NBT is a good money for interim keeping value. Customers do not need to hold NBT always. They can use NBT like use USD, but more convenient than USD. NBT is stable, instant and convenient.

Bitcoin is doing for digital gold while Nubits is doing for money.

Nubits is stable , as long as those gambles behind it willing to back it up and don't lose big funds in the gambling process , is that correct ?
Call this stable is like calling heavy drinking "harmless" just because you can ease your mood with booze and hasn't get liver cancer yet .

BM somehow changed his mind about Nu. He has a good sense about Nu now. The more you learn, the more truth you will know.

http://bytemaster.bitshares.org/article/2015/01/14/A-New-Perspective-on-NuBits/

Can you read English ?
Is that what you're getting at , "good sense" ?
Read again

At least not using Ponzi Scheme. This is a good progress. 

Please improve your reading and understanding skills before you discuss further . 

If you understand differently, you can translate here. I can read Chinese. 

https://discuss.nubits.com/t/apologies-from-a-bitshares-guy/1146

toast is a team member from Bitshares. Anyway, they have better sense about Nu, not just good. 

I think the Nu community should accept the apology and focus more on technical things.

Quote from: 520Bit on January 15, 2015, 09:48:28 am

Quote from: btswildpig on January 15, 2015, 09:45:33 am

Quote from: 520Bit on January 15, 2015, 09:30:39 am

Quote from: btswildpig on January 15, 2015, 08:37:10 am

Quote from: 520Bit on January 15, 2015, 08:20:17 am

Quote from: btswildpig on January 15, 2015, 07:48:45 am

Quote from: 520Bit on January 15, 2015, 07:43:06 am

Nubits have a good trade volume and hit 18870 BTC yesterday. I don't see BitUSD trade volumes reach 200 BTC so far. As a matter of fact, NBT liquidity is better than BitUSD currently, LOL. Let's see what will happen in future.

We can't say the real truth currently.

Customer will say which one is better, right?

This volume is not generate by real demand of customers , rather than those custodian who holds big funds to conduct high risk operations to earn profit  while exposing the Nubits holders the risk of a bankruptcy .

How is that organic growth ?
How is any of that more stable than any other investment bank out there ?

Bragging about this kind of volume is like a bank manager brag about how he take the depositors's money to gamble at Vagas and earn a big reward to give the bank's shareholders .

Great. Customers are happy to get profit from gambling. 

The customer in this equation is the poor guys who bought NBT an get no profit buy only risks .
The only profiting party here is NSR holder .
And the NSR holder is selling the "stable money" slogan to trick the poor customers to buy NBT in order to provide money for them to gamble .

The customers can also be NSR holders and they do not need to buy NBT. The customers can also hold NSR and vote for NBT.

NBT is a good and stable money for customers to reduce the risk of Bitcoins fluctuation. When BTC rising, sell NBT for BTC and when BTC falling sell BTC for NBT. NBT is a good money for interim keeping value. Customers do not need to hold NBT always. They can use NBT like use USD, but more convenient than USD. NBT is stable, instant and convenient.

Bitcoin is doing for digital gold while Nubits is doing for money.

Nubits is stable , as long as those gambles behind it willing to back it up and don't lose big funds in the gambling process , is that correct ?
Call this stable is like calling heavy drinking "harmless" just because you can ease your mood with booze and hasn't get liver cancer yet .

BM somehow changed his mind about Nu. He has a good sense about Nu now. The more you learn, the more truth you will know.

http://bytemaster.bitshares.org/article/2015/01/14/A-New-Perspective-on-NuBits/

Can you read English ?
Is that what you're getting at , "good sense" ?
Read again

At least not using Ponzi Scheme. This is a good progress. 

Quote from: 520Bit on January 15, 2015, 08:20:17 am

Quote from: btswildpig on January 15, 2015, 07:48:45 am

Quote from: 520Bit on January 15, 2015, 07:43:06 am

Nubits have a good trade volume and hit 18870 BTC yesterday. I don't see BitUSD trade volumes reach 200 BTC so far. As a matter of fact, NBT liquidity is better than BitUSD currently, LOL. Let's see what will happen in future.

We can't say the real truth currently.

Customer will say which one is better, right?

This volume is not generate by real demand of customers , rather than those custodian who holds big funds to conduct high risk operations to earn profit  while exposing the Nubits holders the risk of a bankruptcy .

How is that organic growth ?
How is any of that more stable than any other investment bank out there ?

Bragging about this kind of volume is like a bank manager brag about how he take the depositors's money to gamble at Vagas and earn a big reward to give the bank's shareholders .

Great. Customers are happy to get profit from gambling. 

The customer in this equation is the poor guys who bought NBT an get no profit buy only risks .
The only profiting party here is NSR holder .
And the NSR holder is selling the "stable money" slogan to trick the poor customers to buy NBT in order to provide money for them to gamble .

The customers can also be NSR holders and they do not need to buy NBT. The customers can also hold NSR and vote for NBT.

NBT is a good and stable money for customers to reduce the risk of Bitcoins fluctuation. When BTC rising, sell NBT for BTC and when BTC falling sell BTC for NBT. NBT is a good money for interim keeping value. Customers do not need to hold NBT always. They can use NBT like use USD, but more convenient than USD. NBT is stable, instant and convenient.

Bitcoin is doing for digital gold while Nubits is doing for money.

Nubits have a good trade volume and hit 18870 BTC today (http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/volume/24-hour/#BTC). I don't see BitUSD trade volumes reach 200 BTC so far. As a matter of fact, NBT liquidity is better than BitUSD currently, LOL. Let's see what will happen in future.

We can't say the real truth currently.

Customer will say which one is better, right?

Quote from: Rune on October 19, 2014, 11:07:37 am

It seems to me the Chinese community is panicking right now. It needs to be communicated clearly to them as well.

*agreed* ..  I seems they misinterpret the term "proposal"

BTSX is good and global, why worry about Chinese behavior? The community do not want to see a platform only Chinese support.

Quote from: 520Bit on October 19, 2014, 08:35:55 am

@bytemaster,
To be clear, I want to know that changing BTSX from DPOS to POS is a part of your proposal or not?

No, he didnt say that.  And it would be very dumb, because DPoS is bitshares' innovation over PoS.

If this is true, I have no worry about that. Still need bytemaster's clarification.

But 101 delegates are centralized.

Quote from: 520Bit on October 19, 2014, 08:00:30 am

You should not care about the short term price, long term price is a win.

Sorry, but that is BS.

Also, if we go back down to 1 cent, it greatly hurts our long term, everyone will see BTSX as "that pump and dump that went up when they released bitUSD, and then went back down to where it started because it doesnt work"

I am happy if BTSX go back to 1 cent, everybody can get on the train fairly. Actually, 1 cent should be equal to 500 cent.

At the beginning, the total amount of BTS should be 4 million, right now it is 2 billion. So rules are made by people. Let's talk more here.

I like the change this time.