Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - MrJeans

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 40
151
Technical Support / Re: [BitShares 2.0 Technologies] User-Issued Assets (Discussion)
« on: July 04, 2015, 11:37:57 am »
Quote from: bytemaster on July 04, 2015, 04:00:43 am
I think our preferred approach is to make the issuer account name prominent in the user interface.
Cant we do both.

I think there is no good reason to allow me to register bitstamp.ZAR and the only reason I would do this is to scam people.
Why not remove that possibility.

I am looking to issue some UIAs and am therefore discovering what I would really like as a user.

Also if UIAs can float to establish any market pair, wouldnt they be distributed within the network making it difficult for users to find and know what are TRUE UIAs.

EDIT: also, each time a new cryptocurrency comes out that Bitstamp may wish to integrate with they would need to rush over to Bitshares and squat bitstamp.new_cryptocurrency before the scammer gets to it.

152
General Discussion / Re: Announcing Brownie Points (BROWNIE.PTS)
« on: July 03, 2015, 06:28:04 pm »

Hopefully I can think of more stuff and post it :)
I do love brownies  :P

BTS account: mrjeans

153
Technical Support / Re: [BitShares 2.0 Technologies] User-Issued Assets (Discussion)
« on: July 03, 2015, 10:29:14 am »
Another question.

Are users allowed to register and reserve a prefix or suffix.
This would be important to allow them to create branding and direct people to their particular array of assets.

E.g DACx has the BDR. prefix. If someone else is allowed to create a scam BDR.something users may think its a DACx product and purchase it where they may be no 'underlying asset'.

If the registering of a prefix is not enabled I think this would be a huge plus for implementation in 2.0.
Users can pay a much higher fee to register a prefix and then a much smaller fee to register new names with that prefix. We dont want someone creating a scan bitstamp.USD and bitstamp.EUR and then running off with the sales.


154
General Discussion / Re: BitShares + Bitcoin
« on: July 03, 2015, 10:22:41 am »
Quote from: Ander on July 03, 2015, 12:57:17 am
Quote from: merivercap on July 03, 2015, 12:14:31 am
Quote from: Stan on July 02, 2015, 02:22:00 pm
This summer will soon find BitShares fighting side by side with Bitcoin in violent agreement about something.

Wait for that if you want controversy to attract eyeballs.

:)

Proof-of-Work?   :P

lol.
Its great how we find this hilarious.

155
General Discussion / Re: BitShares + Bitcoin
« on: July 02, 2015, 07:53:41 pm »
You kiss your mama with that mouth?
Thanks for remembering my posts  :)
Its cool to have a different opinion, even if its negative. But when people start swearing it means they have lost the argument, ran out of bullets and are trying to throw the gun.

156
Technical Support / Re: [BitShares 2.0 Technologies] User-Issued Assets (Discussion)
« on: July 02, 2015, 05:08:03 pm »
Quote from: bytemaster on July 02, 2015, 04:49:08 pm
Quote from: MrJeans on July 02, 2015, 04:30:13 pm
Ive got some easy questions  :)

What is the fee for issuing a UIA?

My understanding is that a UIA can be traded against any other asset on the network. So can trade against bitUSD and does not need to trade against BTS, correct?

Why then is the NOTES market NOTES:BTS when NOTES:bitUSD would make more sense?

Because that is where all the volume went.  BTS is more liquid than USD and NOTEs and BTS are highly corelated and thus have less volatility than USD vs NOTEs.
Makes sense.

What will the fee be on Bitshares 2.0 for issuing a UIA? I assume this may be adjusted by delegates.
If an exact figure cant be given, maybe an estimate of the fee?

157
Technical Support / Re: [BitShares 2.0 Technologies] User-Issued Assets (Discussion)
« on: July 02, 2015, 04:30:13 pm »
Ive got some easy questions  :)

What is the fee for issuing a UIA?

My understanding is that a UIA can be traded against any other asset on the network. So can trade against bitUSD and does not need to trade against BTS, correct?

Why then is the NOTES market NOTES:BTS when NOTES:bitUSD would make more sense?

158
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] Peak Venture Group Adopts the BitShares Exchange Network
« on: July 02, 2015, 03:33:57 pm »
Quote from: Erlich Bachman on July 02, 2015, 02:16:42 pm
Quote from: Rune on July 02, 2015, 01:55:32 pm
This is the most impressive announcement in bitshares history so far... Why is the price falling? It's baffling.

Because the 5 of us who read it are broke!
Hahaha yes this is why I cant buy more!

159
General Discussion / Re: BitShares + Bitcoin
« on: July 02, 2015, 03:15:59 pm »
This is what you are doing to us Stan

160
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] Moonstone.io development and crowdfunder diary
« on: July 01, 2015, 09:32:44 pm »
I remember hearing something about Bitsapphire looking into providing white listing services.
Can anyone point me to information about that.

EDIT: @onceuponatime. Thanks!

161
General Discussion / Re: THIS is why it's so important to accommodate a GLOBAL audience...
« on: July 01, 2015, 04:28:05 pm »
Yes, I dont understand why Ken is still not a delegate.
Perhaps bring this up before a mumble session where the core devs are present.

162
General Discussion / Re: Scheduled and Recurring Payments on #Bitshares - bitshares.tv
« on: July 01, 2015, 04:25:41 pm »
Quote from: Erlich Bachman on July 01, 2015, 04:15:37 pm
Now we can finally rest in peace knowing that our loved ones will faithfully receive our accumulated wealth with atomic regularity, century after century;  our blood legacy cemented immutably by the public blockchain guaranteeing that our last will and testament cannot be altered or redistributed according to anything but our wishes.
Ha! didnt even think of that.

163
General Discussion / Re: Massive Buy Order on the DEX for bitUSD
« on: July 01, 2015, 02:07:16 pm »
Quote from: DataSecurityNode on June 30, 2015, 03:50:56 am
Or maybe someone convinced the car dealer that they were only going to do a deal for their new beamer if they took payment in bitUSD.
Yes, this!  :D

164
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: 58 delegates - New update - INDEXES of Hang Seng, Shenzhen Composite, and Nikke
« on: July 01, 2015, 10:55:34 am »
Maybe a silly question.
But how would we handle a situation where an index is no longer used/discontinued/another group of assets looked at instead etc.

Im more thinking along the lines of having unit-trust market pegged assets.
A unit trust may stick around for say 20 years, we could therefore have an asset that tracks the value of a single unit. But what happens when its shut down.

165
General Discussion / Re: Here's what 500 youtube Subscribers does for BitShares...
« on: June 30, 2015, 10:37:16 pm »
Subscribed.
Its always cool to read up on the initiatives you are undertaking.
The intro to coaching video has some very small text at parts and is difficult to read.

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 40

Page created in 0.2 seconds with 23 queries.