Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - lafona

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16
196
General Discussion / Re: publish feed price automatic(From BitSuperLab)
« on: December 10, 2014, 01:50:20 pm »
Quote from: liondani on December 09, 2014, 09:56:50 pm
Quote from: chsln on December 09, 2014, 04:51:52 pm
Works for my delegate even if it's not in the top 101

https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/releases/tag/v0.4.25-RC1

-Inactive delegates can now publish price feeds

Is there are way to check if we are publishing feeds if we are not in 101. The script seems to be working fine, but nothing shows up in bitsharesblocks.

197
General Discussion / Re: Sparkle Alpha Test Network Live: Mining to be Honored in Real Network
« on: December 07, 2014, 02:43:02 pm »
Is this person pulse mining as trogladactyl suggested earlier. Looking at where the system pauses(~3 min) from the difficulty rise, the first block after the pause comes from someone else, then this powerful miner fires back up again. Just a theory.

HEIGHT  TIMESTAMP           SIGNING DELEGATE                # TXS   SIZE    LATENCY PROCESSING TIME
===================================================================================================
18111   2014-12-07T14:39:29 SPKJm8qLn5hfgXxVg6QBx9B1XHmL... 0       129     0       0.001527       
18110   2014-12-07T14:39:28 SPKJm8qLn5hfgXxVg6QBx9B1XHmL... 0       129     0       0.001673       
18109   2014-12-07T14:39:27 SPKJm8qLn5hfgXxVg6QBx9B1XHmL... 0       129     0       0.0024         
18108   2014-12-07T14:39:26 SPKJm8qLn5hfgXxVg6QBx9B1XHmL... 0       129     0       0.001876       
18107   2014-12-07T14:39:25 SPKJm8qLn5hfgXxVg6QBx9B1XHmL... 0       129     0       0.001334       
18106   2014-12-07T14:39:24 SPKJm8qLn5hfgXxVg6QBx9B1XHmL... 0       129     0       0.001924       
18105   2014-12-07T14:39:23 SPKJm8qLn5hfgXxVg6QBx9B1XHmL... 0       129     0       0.003515       
18104   2014-12-07T14:39:22 SPKJm8qLn5hfgXxVg6QBx9B1XHmL... 0       129     0       0.002047       
18103   2014-12-07T14:39:21 SPKJm8qLn5hfgXxVg6QBx9B1XHmL... 0       129     0       0.001336       
18102   2014-12-07T14:39:20 SPKJm8qLn5hfgXxVg6QBx9B1XHmL... 0       129     0       0.001762       
18101   2014-12-07T14:39:19 SPKJm8qLn5hfgXxVg6QBx9B1XHmL... 0       129     0       0.001603       
18100   2014-12-07T14:39:18 SPK6ab1TgR2Tjx2YChhfSVeQTgMW... 0       129     0       0.002193       
18099   2014-12-07T14:36:51 SPKJm8qLn5hfgXxVg6QBx9B1XHmL... 0       129     0       0.001918       
18098   2014-12-07T14:36:50 SPKJm8qLn5hfgXxVg6QBx9B1XHmL... 0       129     0       0.00192       
18097   2014-12-07T14:36:49 SPKJm8qLn5hfgXxVg6QBx9B1XHmL... 0       129     0       0.001337       
18096   2014-12-07T14:36:48 SPKJm8qLn5hfgXxVg6QBx9B1XHmL... 0       129     0       0.001953       
18095   2014-12-07T14:36:47 SPKJm8qLn5hfgXxVg6QBx9B1XHmL... 0       129     0       0.002086       
18094   2014-12-07T14:36:46 SPKJm8qLn5hfgXxVg6QBx9B1XHmL... 0       129     0       0.001381       
18093   2014-12-07T14:36:45 SPKJm8qLn5hfgXxVg6QBx9B1XHmL... 0       129     0       0.001846       
18092   2014-12-07T14:36:44 SPKJm8qLn5hfgXxVg6QBx9B1XHmL... 0       129     0       0.001372 

198
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: How long for voters to figure out that there is an inactive delegate?
« on: December 07, 2014, 02:41:13 am »
Quote from: toast on December 07, 2014, 01:41:36 am
Quote from: ripplexiaoshan on December 07, 2014, 01:38:48 am
delegate.adam was voted on purpose, because someone didn't like the previous 101st delegate bts.coin, so he voted for adam to push bts.coin out of 101.

Now we just need to vote for some other active delegate, for example delo.cass. Then this issue will be resolved.

This is interesting! The solution *should* be for everyone to run multiple delegates by default on each node so that people can vote in "fillers". "Backbone" delegates should look into this.

While I think this would be helpful, I also think we should try to test out more new delegates. This would get us closer to a more robust solution then having multiple delegates on one node.

199
General Discussion / Re: Feeds - why do you vote for delegates without feeds?
« on: December 06, 2014, 11:02:51 pm »
I think on top of voting out non publishing delegates we need to actively vote in delegates who have committed to publishing feeds. Could we maybe vote in one or two new delegates collectively every few days. We could even have a thread for trial delegate of the day or week or something like that. If they don't publish feeds we can vote them out after a few days, and if they do a good job, we keep them. It would allow us to try to address the issue without waiting for the ability of standby delegates to publish.

200
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Delegates without feed - why do you not provide feeds?
« on: December 06, 2014, 07:54:09 pm »
I think that not enough people view publishing feeds as a valuable service, almost like you need to be offering something above and beyond to be worth voting in. IMO a 3% delegate publishing feeds should be better than one that is not and a worthwhile improvement. I think there are a few people with delegates ready wanting to publish feeds if they can get voted in. Also, being able to publish feeds as a standby would be helpful, as a way to show you have the script ready.

201
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: free trial vps or digitalocean discount?
« on: December 05, 2014, 06:11:55 am »
I know it works if you scp the whole directory, but mira is probably right. I just never tried it.

202
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: free trial vps or digitalocean discount?
« on: December 05, 2014, 05:26:47 am »
As far as I know amazon offers one free instance of their lowest tier vps. It is not enough to compile on but you can compile at home(using similar os) and scp it to your vps. You have to send one or two extra files but you will get an error basically pointing to where it is. I'm not sure how it will hold up once the delegate is producing blocks.

203
Technical Support / Re: !!! Stupid Questions Thread !!!
« on: November 27, 2014, 02:31:33 pm »
Thanks for both answers! They were very helpful.

204
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: delegate-1.lafona Simple 1% delegate
« on: November 27, 2014, 02:20:25 am »
bitSILVER should be all set.

205
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: delegate-1.lafona Simple 1% delegate
« on: November 27, 2014, 12:59:14 am »
Quote from: Riverhead on November 19, 2014, 03:45:05 pm
You'll get my vote. You could also do 3% with a 2% proof of burn. That would leave you some margin to increase revenue if needed.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk


That is a good point. Although would it be harder to get an accurate vote on my pay increase if it doesn't involve switching one delegate for another?

On a side note. The feed script is ready to go, should I get voted in. I plan to post feeds for CNY USD BTC EUR and GOLD.

206
Technical Support / Re: !!! Stupid Questions Thread !!!
« on: November 26, 2014, 11:53:00 pm »
Do delegates pay a fee to to publish a price feed? and if so is it on fee per Asset (5 x fee per update for five assets) or can multiple asset feed updates be lumped into one transaction?(one fee per update for five assets) Thanks

207
General Discussion / Re: Encourage transmit node?
« on: November 24, 2014, 03:08:14 pm »
By full node do you mean anyone running the bitshares client or is there some additional that need to be selected, closer to the setup of at delegate?

208
General Discussion / Re: Vote for marketing.methodx
« on: November 24, 2014, 02:48:28 pm »
Quote from: wrzkll on November 24, 2014, 02:37:27 pm
Help! For Step 5, When I hit vote, I get a popup which says "Are you sure? This will send xxxxxxxx BTS to (my name). It will charge a fee of 0.5 BTS.

I've never voted. Why do I have to send all my BTS to my self for a fee?

You can change the transaction fee to 0.1 BTS by clicking on Preferences on the left side of the window and changing the value there.

You have to send the entire account value to yourself because it allows the blockchain to store your voting data with the account balance data and essentially any time this data is changed you need a small fee(to prevent spamming and such).
 
Hope this helps

209
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: delegate-1.lafona Simple 1% delegate
« on: November 19, 2014, 03:23:54 pm »
Exactly, initially the value would come primarily from the reduced price. Once I get the feeds up and running then value would come from additional service as well(as quite a few delegates are still not posting feeds). Additionally one could argue that an increase delegate diversity(if an init is replaced) could be added value, once my reliability has been established.

210
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: delegate-1.lafona Simple 1% delegate
« on: November 19, 2014, 03:01:07 pm »
Quote from: xeroc on November 19, 2014, 02:33:28 pm
as a "backbone" so to speak
http://wiki.bitshares.org/index.php/Delegate/PublicData#delegate.role

Yeah, I think that fits.

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16

Page created in 0.197 seconds with 23 queries.