Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - cob

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ... 26
196
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: First PeerTracks gathering
« on: November 24, 2014, 07:07:49 am »
Great!!!  +5% I like the wording "MVP"

So Proto-DAC will be skipped and Music directly goes to MVP?

Not sure yet. I'd love to lie and sound like I have a clue but crypto world moves too fast and I have no idea what can happen until march.

toooooo many moving parts ^^

197
General Discussion / BitShares Music/PeerTracks sprint
« on: November 24, 2014, 05:47:36 am »
Hey everyone for those that are interested in News from the music project, check out this thread:

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=11669.0

Or just check out some of the pics ^^

http://imgur.com/5yKSOnI&vwj4u2W&7qr9gJZ&qJJs2bO&ajydrBL&DzistkC#0

198
Muse/SoundDAC / First PeerTracks gathering
« on: November 24, 2014, 05:41:59 am »
Hello everyone!

As some of you may know PeerTracks just had a week long gathering of the devs in Houston Texas. Since we’ve decided the Minimal Viable Product (MVP) needs to include streaming, we used the opportunity to get the whole team in one location and go over the entire business model from A to Z.

After having met the Kosovo guys (which are AWESOME might I add) in person, we locked ourselves is a house for a week with some whiteboards, post-its, stickers and really got down to business.

To say the week long design sprint was productive would be an understatement! It was extremely valuable. For the first 3-4 days we had epiphany after epiphany. This is going to be bigger than we all thought. And yet the purpose of the sprint was to get all ideas and features and possibilities down to an MVP. So although a ton a value was discovered, the road towards reaching it is now way shorter and simpler.

The goal was to find out what gives us the edge on the competition. What do we have that none of the big players have? What is our unfair advantage?
Well, we found it and are going to capture that market as fast as possible. The rest will be built on top of the MVP and all the extra little features will be added later on once we’ve established a presence in the music market.

Now I wish I could spill the beans and tell you guys everything we figured out and yes it’s very un-crypto of us to keep it secret…
BUT
We simply cannot go into details just yet. We are going up against Google, Apple and a bunch of Sharks in the music industry. They have the funding, they have the coders, they have the time, the lawyers, the contacts.
Yet we found our unfair advantage and are going to RUN with it.

To give you an idea of what I mean, think of google +
Google has the tech, the money, the people, and everything you could possibly imagine to create a great social media platform that could out perform Facebook. And yet, Google + still has not caught on, why? Because the community is what’s valuable. We cannot built a gimmick website that can simply be replicated by the big boys for a million dollars.
We have our unfair advantage and a beach head. We know exactly what we need to do in order to make it big  (:

So just to keep it very general.
-We’ve figured out a way to make our back end cheap, fast and transparent. So much that it could change the crypto and tech worlds in general. BitShares Music might grow up to be much MUCH more.
-We’ve found a way, through the existence of Artistcoins, to benefit to small artist and the already a superstar artist.
-We’ve found a way to fix the Taylor Swift vs Spotify issue. Meaning huge selling point for BIG artists.
-We’ve found a way to make the best playlists out there. (appealing to users/music listeners)
-We’ve found a way to change the entire royalty tracking payment system.

And we’ve actually started testing the user interface with users to see if the non-crypto people get it.

More details will come out as we go of course.

We are planning on a soft launch in March. The goal is to have a working MVP of PeerTracks’ basic features and get a few hundred users testing everything out. Artists will also be able to sign up at launch and see what the blockchain can do for them.
From there, Eddie and I will work on getting additional funding in order to get our MVP all the bells and whistles it needs to be a full blown, scalable beast of a machine!

So thank you everyone for the support thus far. Very appreciated! We are doing our best to deliver a kick ass product ensuring that the network it rests on has a high value. I am no doubt biased on this but I think buying Notes was a good move ^^

Here are a few pictures of our week for those that are interested!

http://imgur.com/5yKSOnI&vwj4u2W&7qr9gJZ&qJJs2bO&ajydrBL&DzistkC#0

199
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Updates. securing funds + march event
« on: November 16, 2014, 07:08:51 pm »
We are right in the middle of an 8 day dev meetup.

This project has been narrowed down and prioritized. All I can say right now in a few sentences before we get back to work is that: THIS WILL BE HUGE.

We have stumbled upon many problems in the music industry that can be solved thru blockchain technology. This means the project could be HUGE. We are coming up with a logical step by step, prioritized MVP.

We still have a couple of days to work everything out.

Expect a massive update near the end of the pre-sale.

This will affect the timing or the DAC vs proto-DAC dates and all.

200
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: T Swift
« on: November 16, 2014, 07:01:58 pm »
Feel free to reach out to her and her fan base guys.

But we will only move forward with the "big boys" once we have something the corporate world can see and get numbers on. They don't want people with ideas, they need actual proposals with simulators, etc.

The streaming model we have come up with this week would GREATLY benefit the big artist. More about this soon.

201
Muse/SoundDAC / Updates. securing funds + march event
« on: November 03, 2014, 06:30:54 pm »
Hello Future NOTE Holders
 
We would like to take this opportunity to thank the crypto community and all others who have participated in the Pre-sale
 
Many of you already know our Note pre-sale address is a multisig address using Copay. We wanted to make sure if one person was compromised in any way that we would not lose all the funds.
 
Today we are moving the funds amassed so far by the pre-sale. We are incurring cost on a daily basis and need these funds to begin to offset those cost. One of those expenses needs to be covered this week – we have six of the brightest minds coming on board this week to see the project through to its first official launch date of March 28 – 29 at the Texas Bitcoin Conference in Austin TX strategically scheduled after SXSW – we plan on being at SXSW the week before as we are a featured platform throughout the conference –
 
The balance of funds and the current funds being received will be held In cold storage for safety -
 
So we are happy to announce that everything is moving forward smoothly and we aim on bringing the music platform of the millennium to the masses – stay tuned!

202
Hi everyone.

Just to clarify. We haven't announced anything because we haven't changed anything :)

Plan A is still. Make our own blockchain using the BitShares toolkit.

If ever the entire DAC would gain by merging with the SuperDAC, then we will consider it. But right now, we are sticking with plan A since I think it's much wiser to take a wait and see approach anyway.

What if the superDAC is the best thing ever coded? Then sure, we will list pros and cons and see what everyone thinks and start that whole debate.
But at least we'll have a precedent and much less moving parts and "what ifs" to consider.


So plan A it is. PeerTracks needs to plug into SOMETHING and there is a lot of work left to be done there.

All this to say, nothing has changed and we will be vocal if we ever start considering it. You will all be in the loop.

Hope this clears things up.

203
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Note pre-sale is live!
« on: October 27, 2014, 08:58:28 pm »
Notes are the collateral required for the BitUSD used on the music blockchain.

So if we manage to displace a billion dollar music industry (meaning tons of BitUSD now trading around on the BitShares Music blockchain) that means a LOT of demand for Notes since they are needed as collateral for each an every BitUSD.

Does that make sense?

204
As of now the Music DAC is taking a wait and see approach. We have to develop the front end as well to bring value and use to the underlying asset. We have plenty of time to make a decision as to what we plug in to. BitShares Music or BitShares mega flagship.

We still have another 40 days of pre-sale at least + bytemaster's announcement to look forward to.
Then we have to consult the forums (:

A month is a long time in the BitShares world!

There are loads of people that are buying in pre-sale because they like very much the Music idea but they don't care about the  Bitshare mega Dac. Say I bought 10 $ worth of Notes  because the idea is so great, and I hope I will make 10x more    If  the acquisition happens and  now you want to give me 10$ worth of BTS( a different  example:  I bought 100000 Notes and now you give me 10000 BTS), this will be a very hard sell. So I suggest to consider very carefully and maybe not to wait until the end of pre-sale  to decide.

Eddie and I's responsibility is to the Music Project and the Note holders.
Whatever we end up doing has to be either neutral or beneficial to whoever spent funds on aquiring Notes.
So we are not changing course.
If anything happens down the line the BTS merger appears super beneficial, then of course we will do what's best for your guys and ourselves.

Point is. Right now, Plan A stays. BitShares Music is it's own DAC.

205
As of now the Music DAC is taking a wait and see approach. We have to develop the front end as well to bring value and use to the underlying asset. We have plenty of time to make a decision as to what we plug in to. BitShares Music or BitShares mega flagship.

We still have another 40 days of pre-sale at least + bytemaster's announcement to look forward to.
Then we have to consult the forums (:

A month is a long time in the BitShares world!

206
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Note pre-sale is live!
« on: October 20, 2014, 10:02:56 pm »
blockchain.info/tx/9159d3ddfefd2e96f0740188714b3f962bd00e9b8466bbe258feeedee0adeaf9

IPO is not done yet, they already spent some coins

We heard of BitCocaine and just couldn't help ourselves  (:

actually some advertising bills came in. Expect a press release soon, and some banners on main sites. More of these bills we will receive in the upcoming weeks.

Past expenses are soon to be reimbursed too. Waiting on some attorneys to send the total bill thus far.

207
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Bitcoins and Gravy with BitShares Music
« on: October 20, 2014, 05:50:13 pm »
tunecore.com is Eddie's baby?

BTW, have you tried to approve Jamendo.com?

No Eddie has no link with Tunecore.

Have not reached out to Jamendo yet. Not just yet (:

209
I'll make this it's own thread once we have a definite mechanism.

But I think everyone will be glad to know that PeerTracks will be incorporating streaming from the get-go.

It will be a subscription model.

We are in R&D mode right now. Looking into Open Transactions, Hyperledger, flattr and reading up on all that fun royalties stuff haha

The easiest model to implement right now would be the subscription model where the user puts say 10$ a month for unlimited streaming.

The ledger keeps track of every song he listens to in his month.
Take the amount of songs he listened to this month. Say 200.
10$/200 plays = 0.05 BitUSD per play.

The ledger is read and PeerTracks sends 0.05 BitUSD to, and only to, the artists that where played by this user that month.

this is the simplified version. Since artists that have artistcoins will have a % going into the coin buy back mechanism.

This is still just in brainstorming mode. We have to see what is scalable and what is even possible in the world of royalty payments.

Just a heads up that we are looking at streaming being incorporated IN the MVP. So far (unless Open Transactions can change the game) the streaming option would be centralized. All the rest still stays on blockchain, no funds held by peertracks. The subscription streaming plan would be something done by PeerTracks though, meaning it would collect funds, and then pay the proper people. Although the ledger is public so we can't screw the artist over like many other services do.

Don't take this post as gospel btw! This is like.. 24 hours after we decided to incorporate streaming into the MVP haha

210
General Discussion / Re: Open Bazaar
« on: October 14, 2014, 05:17:38 am »
Not that we want to be linked with criminals but would a BitShares approach to this allow users to buy anything they want?
I know the idea behind Dark Market/open bazaar was to allow people to purchase what they think they want, not what their nanny state says they can have.

Are we talking about Something that requires TOR? Or a regular BitShares blockchain?

Or maybe a Nice store with an TOR section "You may only browse this section with TOR"

Either way, exciting! This is JUST the type of DAC BitShares needs to jump on. Merchants could even issue out "stock" in their online retail store and use the buy back mechanism BitShares Music plans to use to return value to artistcoin holders/ retail store stockholders.

Merchants that sell a kickass product could do that, and incentivize people to share their link or whatever.

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ... 26